JWeiland Profile picture
Feb 21 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The divergence between Biobot and NWSS continues. NWSS at this point commands a far larger sampling pool than Biobot. Therefore, if we weight toward NWSS data:

🔸780,000 new infections/day
🔸1 in every 430 became infected today
🔸1 in every 43 people currently infected Image
% of ED visits and # hospitalized track NWSS well, but new admissions was flat last week (still much closer to NWSS). Normally all of these data sets have good agreement, but not today! Makes my job more difficult, for sure.

Image
Image
Image
Biobot is the most anomalous in the Northeast. I absolutely don't believe that levels are highest there. Also I think they undersample the South.

NWSS and hosp metrics still show very high levels in the deep south. I'm starting to trust NWSS data more.
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JWeiland

JWeiland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JPWeiland

Feb 1
A set of 8 highly mutated variant designated BA.2.87.1 were released from South Africa today from Sept-Nov 2023.

While this deserves close watch, at this point, I don't think it's as concerning as the arrival of Pirola. I'll explain my reasoning:

1/
Image
It's apparently been 4 months since the first sample collection date, and it still hasnt been detected in any other country that does sequencing.

When Pirola first appeared, there were sequences spotted all over the world within a week or two of first detection.

2/
BA.2.86 already was as fast as the fastest variants out there, and the L455S mutation supercharged it to JN.1. This JN.1 background is going to be a very big hill to climb for a variant that hasn't managed a foothold outside of SA yet in a number of months. Pirola in SA:

3/ Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 24
Biobot update 1/23/2024:

Wastewater receding quickly off of the peak, though still near 1 million new infections a day in America. Decline will continue.

🔸990,000 new infections/day
🔸1 in every 330 became infected today
🔸1 in every 33 people currently infected Image
My latest model run forecasts a steady decline of infections, with no variants competing for dominance against JN.1.

The forecast and result of my previous model (Nov 30) can be found here:

Peak numbers were missed by 0.5%.
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 16
Wastewater update:

Biobot had adjusted their last two weekly estimates down a bit. My Nov. 30th model missed the peak number by 0.6% 😅. Numbers still very high but dropping.

🔸1,270,000 new infections/day
🔸1 in every 26 Americans currently infected
Image
This model was made on Nov 30, when our last biobot data point was from 11/22, 5 full weeks out from the peak readings.
Calibration on the full 4 year scale: Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 17, 2023
In my opinion, 68% XBB is misleading. TODAY it's already less than 50% and dropping like a rock. People probably don't care what the situation was 3 weeks ago.

They want to know what's happening *now* and what is going to happen.

No mention of the fast growth from JN.1.
This is very simple to explain. The BA.2.86 descendent JN.1 is quickly outcompeting and displacing the XBB sublineages, and is pushing metrics upwards in many countries.

Why are we dancing around the facts?
Meant to include this chart in the first tweet Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 17, 2023
This is why we haven't changed Pirola's name for JN.1. This quick evolution was actually predicted by our team as part of Pirola. Even the exact site it needed (S:455) was predicted by members of this team (see @SolidEvidence quote in next tweet from September)
BA.2.86 was able to compete equally with any of the fastest lineages out there, even though it was still very weak against class 1 antibodies. Marc Johnson noted the 455 mutation would give Pirola its full potential, before it even evolved.

JN.1 will be the world's first experience with the Pirola tree.

It optimized quickly, just as we were concerned about. At the very start, we weren't certain exactly which piece it was missing, but by September it became clear it was Class 1 evasion.

Read 5 tweets
Dec 15, 2023
I can help explain with models why trajectory changes "around 50% prevalence" from a growing escape variant/group and why it's a useful *rule of thumb*.

Plot it on a log chart. 40-60% is where the elbow is. Doesn't guarentee a wave, but a change in trajectory, absolutely.

Image
Image
Image
The faster the growth, the *sharper* the elbow. Slower growth? Weak elbow. Multiple variants growing at different speeds? Multiple smaller elbows. JN.1 has enough growth to push numbers up in most countries.
Image
Image
If you say things like "See, JN.1 was already at 20% and no wave yet!", it shows a lack of understanding of the dynamics. There will be *some* effect by 20%, but the real impact will come later towards dominance.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(