Seth Frantzman Profile picture
Feb 21 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
When Hamas launched the October 7 attack, likely with backing and advise from several countries that host and back Hamas, it knew that there would be an Israeli response. It assumed if it took enough a hostages then it could somehow force talks to go on for years...while it benefited.
It's important to understand that Hamas has been able to carry out massacres and attacks for three decades because each time it does it, it relies on the international community to quickly rush to make sure there is a ceasefire. So the process is:

1. Hamas attacks
2. Israel responds
3. Ceasefire.
4. Hamas attacks again.
Hamas is the "tool" that was found by some in the international community in the late 1980s and early 1990s to prevent peace and it was always on hand to be picked up to attack Israel whenever there was any sign of peace. They reach for the "tool" each time, during the Oslo process, in the Second Intifada...after Disengagement etc.
It's so obvious because Disengagement was an opportunity to help Gaza thrive...but the international community and other backers of Hamas reached for their tool to have Hamas take over Gaza. No one reached for the tool of peace and moderation, which would have been easy to reach for.
October 7 was planned as a major moment for Hamas, it would committ an unprecedented massacre, then hold hostages for years to bring in billions more for its tunnels in Gaza and then use the hostages to gain more influence in the West Bank. When Abbas passes, Hamas would swoop in...it would make itself a "tool" again to be picked up to take over Ramallah for its patrons and benefactors abroad.
It's important to understand also that Hamas believed on October 7 that there was a time limit to Israel's reaction...Israel would be allowed to "run wild" for a few weeks...and then there would be a ceasefire and deal and the war would stop so Hamas can replenish its thousands of rockets and start a new war the next year or two.
This is the model for Hamas. Start a war, bring ruin on part of Gaza...use the rebuilding of Gaza to construct tunnels and arsenals...start a war, bring ruin, reconstruct tunnels...
It's important to understand that Hamas did this because in past wars it didn't lose very many fighters. Usually 100 to 1,000 fighters and then it would replace them. All the destruction caused by Israeli bombs can be rebuilt and Hamas contractors make the money doing reconstruction and for each dollar that comes half of it or something like that goes to Hamas and tunnels.
In fact each war was a "win" for Hamas because for each building hit by an IDF bomb, Hamas can then openly build a tunnel underneath as part of "reconstruction"....it doesn't even had to hide that it replaces whole ruined areas with new terror infrastructure, enhanced and embedded in new civilian homes. Fully integrated. As militaries say "5th gen"...
And Hamas always benefits from war because when there are civilian casualties it can use this to bring the ceasefire faster and bring condemnation of Israel. Hamas has its connections abroad via its allies and partners who mobilize protests and activists. In the May 2021 conflict with Israel there was a dry run to mobilize attacks on Jewish communities abroad, for instance.
So we have to understand how Hamas thought on October 6. It believed it would use the hostages to bring itself power in Ramallah. It believed that after a few weeks the war would end and it would thrive.
Now, four months in, it knows that it has not been able to get Israel to do a ceasefire, but it watches the UN and it knows the votes are getting closer. It is being advised by its host country to hold out a little longer. Hold out in Rafah and then filtrate back to northern Gaza and return to power.
Hamas also knows that quietly, behind the scenes many international organizations prefer its rule in Gaza. For instance they speak about Hamas police as "law and order" and if there aren't Hamas gunmen to guard the humanitarian aid they are displeased...they feel secure when Hamas is there. It's their partner.
The idea that anyone but Hamas could or would control Gaza is worrisome to many international stakeholders there. Hamas has been their loyal partner for decades. Hamas police are the ones they work with. In areas without Hamas they call it "lawless"....in essence Hamas is the preferred authoritarian they want.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Frantzman

Seth Frantzman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfrantzman

May 19
Another example of the Hamas crime against humanity. Hamas, which is backed by Ankara, Doha, Tehran, Moscow, carried out the Oct. 7 massacre knowing it would spark a huge war and Hamas didn’t care about the children of Gaza when it did this. Hamas illegally plunged the kids into a war that they had no say in. Hamas genociders didn’t ask the kids, and their billionaire leadership that relaxes abroad didn’t ask or find educational solutions.
The biggest crime here is that Hamas is backed by two western allies. They host the Hamas leaders and they backed Oct 7. They collaborated to cause this horrid war and deny children in Gaza a right to an education. While Hamas leaders all profit and benefit in Doha…the kids suffer. The chauvinist male leadership of Hamas relaxes and takes away the future of kids
It’s worth noting that Hamas illegally took over Gaza in 2007 and western NGOs partnered with it…instead of opposing it…empowering this crime against humanity and endless war the poor people of Gaza have been stuck with since Hamas took over
Read 5 tweets
May 17
It will be interesting if we ever learn the timing of when the tunnels to Egypt from Rafah, or the smuggling began to increase...

In 2012 Hamas leaders moved to Qatar. That was when Morsi of the MB was running Egypt. At the time it was assumed that the MB and groups like it would sweep the region in the wake of the Arab Spring and extremists exploiting the "spring" with support from Doha and Ankara.
By 2013 Sisi was in charge in Egypt, and one thing that he wanted to stop was the insurgency in Sinai. It took years to do that. Hamas in Gaza had exploited the chaos in Sinai and also chaos in Libya and elsewhere to benefit. There was a conflict in 2012 and 2014.
Israel and Egypt security ties related to the threat of ISIS and other extremists in Sinai were positive ties. We know that Egypt was willing to rethink regional strategy at the time, it was concerned about regional chaos, it even continued low level ties to the Syrian regime
Read 9 tweets
May 17
Israel's IDF said today that "The bodies of the hostages Yitzhak Gelernter, Shani Louk, and Amit Buskila were rescued overnight during a joint IDF and ISA operation. Based on verified intelligence in our possession, Yitzhak Gelernter, Shani Louk, and Amit Buskila were murdered during the October 7th Massacre at the Mefalsim Intersection, and their bodies were abducted to Gaza."
This is a reminder that Hamas has not been charged with crimes against humanity yet and it continued to receive a lot of backing from intl NGOs...and it is ALSO a reminder of how so many voices tried to prevent an IDF operation in Gaza because they wanted to let Hamas keep holding bodies as leverage, just as Hamas did with the bodies of Oron Shaul and Hadar Goldin, which Hamas illegally held for a decade and which Hamas continues to hold.
The criminal organization Hamas holds living and dead hostages in Gaza. In some cases it took them to medical facilities where they were likely seen by all the intl orgs that work there...but those orgs have a kind of omerta with the Hamas cartel...and so they don't speak up about this group.
Read 4 tweets
May 16
I believe the goal of Hamas is to leverage Oct. 7 to come to power in the West Bank. Working with Fatah would be one step on that road. It's important to understand that Hamas has a lot more backing abroad today than the PA. Hamas is backed by Ankara, Doha, Tehran and also by Moscow, and probably also Beijing. The PA is being starved of resources. Hamas is making its moves.
Israel's leadership has opposed the PA running Gaza because of the concerns about Fatah. This has led to arguments that Hamas shouldn't be replaced by Fatah. However...in the end of the day Israel is being handed a fait accompli...that Hamas is already seeking to move closer to the PA's factions
The big concern everyone should have is that Hamas uses the fact that Israel opposes it and the PA to coopt the PA to its cause and that it can then infiltrate the West Bank and the PA institutions under the guise of "technocrats"....and then slowly take over from within.
Read 6 tweets
May 16
I’m on the Gaza border today visiting several sites related to the humanitarian aid crossings and covering several stories. One thing I was struck by was the thought that the current debate in Israel over plans for the “day after” are only a tip of the iceberg of the larger question of reconstruction
If the war ends there is going to be a battle to “win the peace”….which means the countries that back Hamas will want to do the reconstruction and that means rebuilding the tunnels and bringing in more weapons as they did after 2009.
Today in Israel there is a debate about how to find a non-Hamas governing authority and the leadership is saying that they don’t want Hamas or Fatah, they don’t want the PA in Gaza. This inevitably means Hamas returns to power. They say that one can’t plan for after until Hamas is totally defeated, which so far it isn’t.
Read 8 tweets
May 15
The US-built floating pier could be operational in coming days according to a briefing today. The pier will be off the coast of Gaza and will enable a new maritime corridor from Cyprus where cargo ships will arrive at the. pier and offload goods, then the items will be put on trucks to be shuttled to shore on smaller ships that offload them to a pier affixed to the shore; then the goods go inland.

A few takeaways from the briefing.
United States Agency for International Development Response Director Dan Dieckhaus and Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, Deputy Commander, United States Central Command spoke at the briefing. It was insightful into how this important mission is being characterized.
The briefing stressed that this maritime corridor is additive, it augments current aid delivery, it is NOT intended to replace any other crossings. For instance, the closed Rafah crossing with Egypt and Gaza still should be opened.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(