🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Feb 22 2 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Powerful Supreme Court amicus brief by legal heavyweights.

Including vocal Never Trumper Steven Calabresi.

They make a persuasive argument Garland’s appointment of Jack Smith is unconstitutional.

Thus, Jack Smith’s prosecutions of Trump are illegal.


Fact (and Legal) Check: True. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mrddmia

Mar 29
Let's get this straight.

Senate Democrat leader Chuck Schumer went to the steps of the Supreme Court and physically threatened the justices, if they didn't rule his way on a pending case.

For months, Biden Democrats threatened and intimidated Supreme Court justices and their families in their homes.

With that same pending case.

The Biden White House and Justice Department encouraged these illegal obstruction-of-justice campaigns, falsely stating they were protected by the First Amendment. (They are absolutely not. They are a federal crime.)

Even after justices and their families went to safe houses.

Even after the 1 am assassination attempt against Justice Kavanaugh, his wife Ashley, and their two teenage daughters.

Biden Democrats constantly attack Ginni Thomas for her lifelong political advocacy--in which she has engaged long before her husband became a judge or justice.

But Trump is somehow "threatening" by pointing out the clear political biases of Democrat judges, prosecutors, attorneys, their staffs, their adult family members, and witnesses?

If anyone on the planet has the absolute constitutional right to do this, it is a criminal defendant.

Especially one going through a criminal process that is so obviously politicized and weaponized against him.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 23
Absent a compelling reason, it is shameful for Members of Congress to resign.

Their constituents lose their representative--for months.

These Members violate their promises and oaths:

"I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter."
And Mike Gallagher (@RepGallagher/@MikeforWI) timed his resignation so his Wisconsin constituents will not have a House representative for nearly 10 months.

Truly a disgrace.

"Gallagher’s decision to leave April 19 also means that there will not be a special election to fill his seat. Under Wisconsin state law, vacancies after the second Tuesday in April are filled in the general election, so Gallagher’s replacement will be decided in November and his seat will remain empty until January."

Read 6 tweets
Feb 28
Federal judges must release January 6th protesters wrongfully convicted under the Biden DOJ’s politicized, bogus use of a federal criminal statute never intended to get weaponized against political opponents.

Trump 47 DOJ must hold accountable responsible Biden DOJ officials.
And every federal judge—partisan Democrat and cowardly Republican—who went along this:

You are a disgrace.

To the Constitution.

You ruined the lives of so many families.

You do not have the judgment to serve.

You should resign.

But you will not.

Because you are a disgrace.
We must make major reforms to the federal courts in DC.

The DC federal judges are largely political operatives in robes.

From both parties.

The uniparty.

Their response to January 6th proved this.

DC federal judges have too much power.

Yet they lack sound judgment.

Read 6 tweets
Feb 6
Today's decision by the Democrat-controlled DC Circuit Court of Appeals is as predictable as it is wrong.

Members of Congress are immune, both civilly and criminally, for their officials acts.

So are federal judges.

Why wouldn't the President of the United States--any President?

Four DC federal judges did not even establish at a baseline level that the President of the United States cannot be thrown in prison by his successor based upon his official acts.

They ignored the Constitution's separation of powers.

Thus, the Supreme Court must take and decide this case.

This case is much bigger than Trump.

This precedent is very dangerous and highly destructive to the presidency--thus, our Constitution and country.

This means the Trump 47 Justice Department can prosecute Obama--along with his aides like U.S. Circuit Judge David Barron, Obama's legal advisor at the time--for capital murder for their extrajudicial drone-striking of American citizens (including a minor).

This also means the Trump 47 Justice Department can prosecute Biden for his illegal release of dangerous migrants into the United States and the natural and probable crimes they commit.

Will the Supreme Court do its job?

Or allow these Republic-ending tactics?

The DC Circuit creates a special rule for Trump.

(So they can ignore their ruling to protect Obama and Biden.)

If the Supreme Court wants the federal judiciary to keep any legitimacy with half of the American people, it must do its job and fix this dangerously wrong ruling. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 16
Dear @JoyAnnReid:

Iowa has always been a leader on civil rights.

We’ve always been a free state.

The Iowa Supreme Court protected out-of-state slaves in 1839.

We desegregated our schools in 1868.

And allowed Black men to vote that same year.

We allowed women to vote in 1920.

And we’ve been a refugee resettlement state for 50 years.

Iowa is a very welcoming place.

For you to pretend Iowa is a racist state proves you’re shamefully and disgustingly dishonest with your viewers.

But your anti-white, anti-Christian bigotry makes your deranged leftwing @MSNBC viewers very happy.
Let me be more blunt:

@JoyAnnReid doesn’t care if poor Black kids are trapped in failed government schools.

She doesn’t care about rampant Black-on-Black murders and other violent crime.

She just wants to make a bunch of money off of deranged white liberals who watch @MSNBC.
Her father came from the Congo.

Her mother came from Guyana.

Guess where they met?

The University of Iowa.

In the “racist” state that provided two African immigrants with their graduate degrees.

So @JoyAnnReid is an elite Black woman, born into privilege provided by Iowans.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 6, 2023
ICYMI from @joshgerstein in @Politico on November 13, 2021:

FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

"The Biden administration’s effort to establish itself as a committed champion of press freedom is facing new doubts because of the Justice Department’s aggressive legal tactics against a conservative provocateur known for his hidden-camera video stings."

"A predawn FBI raid last weekend against Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe and similar raids on some of his associates are prompting alarm from some First Amendment advocates, who contend that prosecutors appear to have run roughshod over Justice Department media policies and a federal law protecting journalists."

Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!