Thread by @SeanParnellUSA

.@PolitiFact & @AmySherman1 tried to fact check me on Instagram.
I knew they would. They walked right into this. Here is the post. Let me show you how this is all propaganda.

Here is her email to me. You can see by her questions that she’s already prejudged the issue.
Loose references to her reading the news & asking the Dem Secretary of State about it, who I guess she took uncritically at his word.

Here is a screenshot of my reply to her, which I sent at 1:57pm. Well before her deadline of 4pm.
Her email to me was sent at 12:40pm. So I didn’t wait that long to reply. And did so in good faith. My full response is in the next post.

Hi Amy,

I really appreciate you reaching out. It sounds like you’re asking me to do an investigation of this specific incident in Nevada but fortunately it’s not necessary because we can look at history as a reference and draw reasonable conclusions from there.
The premise of your question is flawed and ultimately misses the point of my post on Instagram and the core of the issue itself.  That is, mail in voting is not the best way to conduct an election. It is also not the best way to build confidence in the electorate, the latest issue in Nevada is just one recent example.
Serious concerns regarding mail in voting were found in the Commission on Federal Election Reform, which was chaired by former President Jimmy Carter.
It was also the position held by the New York Times in 2012.
You can read that article here:
Headline: Error and Fraud at Issue as Absentee Voting Rises—


It’s also reasonable to assume that these concerns are the basis for why mail in voting is banned in most developed countries

‘Most developed countries ban mail-in ballots unless the citizen is living abroad or require Photo-IDs to obtain those ballots. Even higher percentages of European Union or other European countries ban mail-in ballots for in country voters.’

You can download the full abstract here:

Original Research: Why do most countries ban mail-in ballots?: They have seen massive vote fraud problems



With these concerns in mind it’s fairly easy to conclude that we have issues here in America as well, is it not? Given our government’s long history of misrepresenting the truth, perhaps we should not trust any Secretary of State’s explanation as the final word on the matter since they usually are interested in protecting a narrative and not the truth. Has anyone investigated to see if what the Nevada Secretary of State said about this issue was true?
Have you reached out to Cisco Aguilar? If so, will you please let me know? No one is denying that the voter history information is wrong. If there’s an investigation being done, it would just be getting started. So it’s premature and unreasonable to demand evidence and even more so to request the ‘number of fraudulent ballots cast’. What you’re asking is essentially the same as asking someone the cause of death prior to an autopsy being conducted, is it not? It seems to me that you’ve already prejudged this issue based on your line of questioning.

Perhaps we should allow for an open and honest discourse in the service of reforming institutions paid for by US taxpayers, especially when it’s about an issue as important as election integrity.

Thank you. Have a great day.

Sincerely,

Seannytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/…
crimeresearch.org/2020/08/origin…

Her official ‘fact check’ came today sometime. She attributes a false quote to me. I never said this. But that’s not all.

She said that I did not reply. But as you can see above, I did.
@PolitiFact & @AmySherman1 are nothing more than regime propagandists, & they are harming the country with these lies.
When you see a ‘fact check’ realize it’s about defending the narrative not the truth.