oh my god. One of the three authors of the New York Times' "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax is Anat Schwartz. She liked posts calling for Gaza to be turned into a "slaughterhouse". This the person the NYT hired to write about Palestinians and frame them as sub-human monsters
she also liked posts repeating the 40 beheaded babies hoax. This is unbelievable. The New York Times got Anat Schwartz along with Adam Sella and Jeffrey Gettleman, both of whom are also rabid Zionist maniacs, to freely express their deep racist contempt of Palestinians. Holy shit
if you look at the NYT output on the "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax, Anat Schwartz was pushing it since November. Then they got Gettleman and Adam Sella to do their main push of the hoax along with her in December. These are people who believe the 40 beheaded babies lie
btw Anat Schwartz never wrote a single word for the NYT before November. That's her first piece for them, and they chose a person who believes that Gaza "must the turned into a slaughterhouse", and that Palestinians are "animals" who deserve a "Holocaust". That is fucking insane
can you imagine this in any other context. Imagine a Russian liked and shared posts saying Ukrainians must be mass killed in a Holocaust because they're sub-human animals, then the NYT hires them to write about Ukrainians being evil rapist terrorists. It's impossible to imagine
holy shit, the posts she liked also says Israel should execute Palestinians which includes many children "if a hair is harmed on the heads" of the Israeli prisoners in Gaza. That's fucking insane. This woman is deranged. The NYT hired a Nazi to paint Palestinians as evil animals
I know there are people at the New York Times who have some basic humanity and integrity left, some minimal honesty. They voiced their criticisms, it has been reported. Do you think this is normal and acceptable? What will you do about this?
it is clear now the only thing you can do that is the minimally moral, ethical thing not just as a journalist but as a human being: Demand the NYT retract this disgusting, vile, depraved hoax that is still being disseminated to this very day by every Western media outlet
every day that you allow this disgusting vile hoax to stand with the symbolic weight of the New York Times behind it, that you allow open explicit Nazis, because that is what Anat Schwartz is, to dehumanize Palestinians, you are contributing to the ongoing Gaza "slaughterhouse"
I and others have exposed in detail what you know as well, that this is a depraved genocidal hoax perpetrated by the NYT's Jeffrey Gettleman, Adam Sella and Anat Schwartz. It is your responsibility to demand accountability for it
the post liked by one of the principal NYT authors of the "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax, Anat Schwartz, was literally cited by South Africa as evidence of genocidal intent. They got this person to write about Palestinians. I almost can't believe it
there is also a huge conflict of interest with two of the principal authors of the NYT "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax, Anat Schwartz and Adam Sella. Just WTF is the NYT doing. Did they actually think they could get away with this? Just zero shame
that post reveals even worse things than just the glaring conflict of interest: Anat Schwartz has zero experience being a reporter in general, let alone on this subject. They just hired a random Zionist racist maniac who believes Gaza must be turned into a "slaughterhouse"
the only reason they hired her is because another deranged and depraved Zionist maniac, Adam Sella, is related to her, and knows her, and knows she shares his own racist beliefs. And Jeffrey Gettleman has the exact same views, and also joined in on it. Zero journalistic integrity
what the New York Times did here, which again is being spread to this very day, just yesterday the Israeli regime submitted a report to the UN based on the NYT hoax concocted by these depraved racist genocidal maniacs, is the worst journalistic malpractice in recent history
this is astonishing, it only gets worse. Anat Schwartz also liked posts where it explicitly calls on Israeli propagandists to fabricate the narrative that "Hamas is ISIS" for Western audiences, which is exactly what she then went on to do with the NYT hoax
see also the thread below destroying the pathetic desperate attempt by the NYT to scapegoat Anat Schwartz and pretend it's just a matter of social media etiquette. Btw, as the NYT hired her she kept working for Israeli state media. A literal propagandist
if you thought all this was bad, it gets much worse. Meet Adam Sella, the other main "on the ground reporter" of the New York Times' "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax, a recent college grad food writer (yes, really) and nephew of Anat's husband:
UPDATE: The NYT now has a major internal crisis. Reporters who still have some basic journalistic integrity and ethics are horrified by leadership allowing Adam Sella, his uncle's wife Anat Schwartz and Jeffrey Gettleman to fabricate this genocidal hoax
meanwhile Schwartz finally responds to her being exposed as a genocidal racist maniac with zero journalistic experience who together with Adam Sella and Jeffrey Gettleman set out to fabricate the NYT's biggest hoax since Judith Miller, and it's deranged:
important recent update: Adam Sella, his uncle's partner Anat Schwartz and Jeffrey Gettleman framed the follow-up to their original "mass rape" hoax as the UN going to vindicate them (see ), but instead it definitively debunked it:
update: The Intercept confirmed another hoax claim fabricated in the NYT by Anat Schwartz, her husband's nephew food blogger Adam Sella who continues to write regularly for them as one of their main "reporters" on the Gaza genocide, and Jeffrey Gettleman:
Bernie Sanders and his wife went to Ireland recently and threw out anti-genocide protesters from their event because they asked him to accept what Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, the UN and every major human rights org have said: That it's an Israeli genocide, not "Netanyahu's war"
Bernie Sanders continues to angrily mock and smear those who recognize the genocide. In interviews he says "what, so now 8 people get killed and that's a genocide?!?" But he immediately accepted that Russia and China are doing genocide. He's a Zionist liar and genocide denier
to be absolutely clear: It is inconceivable that Bernie Sanders and his wife would dare deny a genocide recognized by Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and the UN in any other context. They would not dare. They only do it for their precious Israel.
Ihab Hassan just deleted his original post saying UNRWA warehouses are Hamas and reposted it keeping the genocidal Zionist propaganda that Hamas shot and killed people even though it was Israeli-armed death-squads. Even Grok fact-checked his lies. This is Owen Jones' fav account
Ihab Hassan knows that all those in his replies and all those promoting his genocidal Zionist propaganda are Israeli regime assets and propagandists. He's just doing his job. Owen Jones knows it too, and he has made at least a million pounds off of his "anti-genocide activism"
that post Ihab Hassan made with the genocidal Zionist hoax lie fabricated to launder the ongoing starvation and mass murder of Palestinian babies, children, girls, boys, women and men was immediately swarmed by all the big Zionist accounts. It will get over a million views by the end of the day.
Again, ask yourself this very simple question: Why did Owen Jones singlehandedly create Ihab Hassan's social media account into what it is today by constantly promoting him since October 7 and up to this very day even though he knows all this about that account and the role it plays in the Zionist propaganda ecosystem?
Why did a person who turned his entire persona about being anti-genocide and how you need to hold every person in media accountable and you must name and shame, NAME AND SHAME!!!, why did he create and keeps promoting and building one of the largest Zionist media propaganda genocide-laundering machines online?
If you ask that question, you will know who and what Owen Jones really is.
how is Zionist propaganda laundering the ongoing genocide fabricated, disseminated and laundered, and how does Owen Jones play a key role in that process? Here is case study from just the past hour.
Ihab Hassan is now one of the most prominent Israeli regime Zionist genocide-launderers, and he does it by hiding it behind Palestinian-face. Here he is spreading the Zionist propaganda line that UNRWA warehouses are actually Hamas and Israeli armed and backed criminal gangs are also Hamas, thereby justifying the starvation and attacks on them and ensuring that the genocidal starvation policy will continue.
Owen Jones has been promoting Ihab Hassan since the genocide began, as he sees him as the "good Palestinian", the good gusano slave boy who "condemns Hamas" and supports a two-state solution and loves the UAE and Saudi Arabia and is paid by them. He's a good little boy, well-behaved, the kind of "Palestinian" Owen Jones doesn't block like he has done with countless, but the one he constantly promotes, to this very day, even though he knows that Israeli regime officials use him as one of their main propaganda assets to launder their genocidal lies.
Why? Why would Owen Jones, who has made it his public persona over the past year or so that he's this epic based radical anti-genocide activist, singlehandedly create a Zionist propaganda asset that is daily laundering the genocide?
I'll leave it up to you to decide why someone can be such an odious depraved scumbag.
If you ask me, it's pretty simple. Owen Jones knew full well that anti-genocide sentiments were not only the standard position on the left, but among the broad public, and if he went against that it would be the end of the his career, based as it was on a pseudo-radical persona who launders the Guardian's genocidal propaganda by giving it a radical sheen and allowing them to get away with it, as David Graeber pointed out: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…
Owen Jones has never said a single word about the genocidal propaganda fabricated and spread by his Guardian colleagues like Bethan McKernan, who produced the most deranged version of the genocidal atrocity propaganda rape hoax.
He did not defend his Guardian colleague Steve Bell when he was fired for a cartoon of Netanyahu. He did not defend another one of his Guardian colleagues who had his article deleted because it humanized Palestinians too much.
Why? Because if Owen Jones does that, his lucrative Guardian sinecure is ended, and he can't have that.
No, he wants to keep his Guardian money, and he wants to continue to play the role of the genocide-launderer in chief for them.
That's his sole purpose in life, it's his entire social being's function: I play the radical on TV and on social media, then I write columns for the Guardian and I launder your genocidal Zionist propaganda as actually being legitimate and important "Serious Journalism", because hey, they have Owen Jones writing for them, and he's a real radical!
Owen Jones has always been one of the most odious cunt scumbags alive, and I will never stop pointing this out as he thinks he's hiding in plain sight promoting odious genocidal Zionist propaganda assets like Ihab Hassan to this very day.
Owen Jones blocked me when I exposed him for being a huckster liar spreading genocidal Zionist propaganda and it is instructive to read the entire thread to see the depravities he's desperate to hide so he can keep creating Zionist assets like Ihab Hassan:
Piers Morgan is one of the most depraved genocidal Zionist propagandists, and in that he is the perfect reflection of the entire Western media and political class, from the NYT to the BBC, AP and Guardian. Here he is being exposed for spreading the 40 beheaded babies hoax:
Piers Morgan is also a gleeful genocidal Zionist rape hoaxer, and he is so shameless that he spreads the hoax while defending actual Zionist pedophile rapist Alan Dershowitz as he calls him his very good friend. Morgan himself was associated with Epstein's pedo ring:
everything being done by the Trump admin now to push the "turn on Israel/Netanyahu" line is pure misdirection aimed at re-establishing the element of surprise ahead of the imminent attack on Iran, which requires both a sustained air bombardment and a ground operation at the nuclear sites.
For the attack to have at least some chance of success, it is essential for the element of surprise to be re-established. The fake "negotiations" in Oman with the Iranians, the demotion of Watlz, the whining about "neo-cons" like in the Saudi Arabia speech, the fake "defeat" against the Houthis and all the fake "leaks" about how Trump is really very angry and feels betrayed by Netanyahu, are all intentionally designed to create a feeling of passivity among the Iranians and the belief that the attack may not actually happen.
Netanyahu's trips to DC was where they decided to adopt this strategy, and then immediately thereafter it was launched and the "Trump turn on Israel" propaganda began in full swing. The entire media class is of course playing along with it, with their "anonymous sources" giving them "leaks" that establish and launder the narrative.
Trump's trip to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf puppet regime is aimed at shoring up support among the US-NATO-Israeli empire's "Arab shield", and consolidate the inclusion of Syria's Erdogan-Jolani fascist puppets into it ahead of the attack.
As they have been desperately trying to re-establish the element of surprise with bullshit meaningless rhetoric, these are the actual material things that are being done to set up the preparations for the attack.
Trump's Zionist enforces have been heavily involved in Lebanon, demanding they do more and more to destroy Hezbollah and prevent its ability from being a deterrent against an attack. Again, Syria plays a crucial role in this, which is why they have now formally integrated it into the US-NATO-Israeli empire. This is not only to eliminate the land corridor between Iran and Hezbollah, but also to have the ISIS-fascist proxies serve as an attack force against them in the case they get involved, with an invasion of Lebanon from the East being threatened.
Similar moves are being made in Iraq, with Trump's Zionist enforcers demanding the state crack down on paramilitary forces that are not beholden to the US-NATO-Israeli empire but instead aligned with the Axis of Resistance.
What about the Houthis? The Trump Zionist regime realized that the bombing campaign by itself would not be sufficient to destroy them, and they needed to make preparations for a ground invasion with the aid of its Gulf proxies, the UAE and Saudis chief among them. To help establish the misdirection narrative of the "Trump turn on Netanyahu", they decided to come out with the fake leaks about how what was always intended to be a temporary withdrawal was actually part of the "distancing" between the US and Israel.
They will re-launch that campaign with the ground invasion in concert with the attack on Iran, or perhaps even earlier.
The Trump regime already made the decision before it came into office that the "Axis of Resistance", meaning the only material force in the region that withstands genocidal Zionist Israeli and broader US-NATO imperial hegemony, has to be destroyed by military means and that now is the perfect time to do it because, so the propaganda line goes, Hezbollah and Hamas have both been defeated and so are no longer deterrents, and Iran has shown itself to be a paper tiger that talks a tough game with red lines and operation true promises, but then never follows through so is fundamentally risk-avert and unwilling to retaliate with the required force which it certainly possesses.
This btw is another propaganda line they keep repeating, which is totally deranged and pure Mossad-CIA propaganda: The claim that Israel actually managed to destroy most if not all of Iran's air defenses and rocket building capacities in its pathetic irrelevant attack that in reality had zero effect on anything.
Yet if you read the NYT (Ronen Bergman the Mossad asset), BBC, Washington Post, CNN, AP, Reuters, Guardian, it is now accepted truth that Israel has already destroyed Israel's defenses, and so any attack on Iran will be easy, involves very little risk, and they'll be too weak to respond.
This btw is how the CIA-Mossad approached Trump with their war plan and got him to accept it.
This is of course the irony: To successfully establish deterrence, you have to show that you are willing to go to war. If you instead impose red lines and they keep being broken and you don't even follow through with what you said were the appropriate responses even below the level of an all-out war, like the bombing of Tel Aviv in exchange for the bombing of Beirut, then you have lost all deterrent value. You have convinced the other side that you are weak.
Iran's fundamental mistake was that they kept seeing their red lines being violated, and then they didn't follow through on what they themselves had said would be the response. The same with Hezbollah.
This is why Israel was emboldened enough to assassinate Nasrallah. They have admitted that they delayed it for a very long time because they were afraid of Hezbollah and Iran's response. Then they did the assassinations of Haniyeh, Fuad Shukr, and there was nothing. They did nothing. They just whined. They just posted videos of drone footage over Israeli military bases. And now Nasrallah is gone and they are tightening the noose around Lebanon and proceeding with its full integration into the US-NATO-Israeli empire.
take note that the entire Western media and political class, including all the pseudo-radicals, the "experts", the epic based "Israel critics", the Intercept and Drop Site writers, the Murtazas who btw is sincerely the dumbest motherfucker alive, are all going along with the "Trump turn on Israel" propaganda. They're either doing it because they're just as in the aforementioned case plainly stupid and always follow the herd (more on that here: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…), they believe whatever is published in the NYT and Washington Post and Guardian and always follow the State Department line as filtered through the liberal media class, or because they're intentionally part of the misdirection propaganda campaign, as is the case with Mossad asset Ronen Bergman at the New York Times (more on him here: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…).
These are the same people who went along with the "Trump turned on Netanyahu and got a real ceasefire!" bullshit in January. And of course when it predictably turned out to have been a misdirection ploy to get the "civilian" prisoners out and also try to identify the locations of the resistance through that process (both from debriefing the prisoners and the drones constantly hovering above), and they immediately went back to the genocide exactly as I said they would all along: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…
Now of course there are zero consequence for media class hacks when they go along with propaganda like this and they are all proven wrong because that's their function. They don't even admit they were wrong, they just pretend like their current participation in manufacturing consent is actually based on real deep insights and expertise and knowledge.
It's based on nothing other than being fucking hacks.
You'll see when the US launches its war all these people will again face zero consequences for having participated in the misdirection campaign, and start pontificating about the real meaning and significance of it as if they had known it would happen all along.
see also this recent thread where I made the same point: x.com/zei_squirrel/s…. Now what if my seeing through this blatantly obvious, just hilariously transparant bullshit fake "leaked" stories of "OMG LOOK AT US, WE ARE SO ANGRY AT NETANYAHU, OMG LOOK AT THIS EPIC LEAKED STORY IN WAPO AND WSJ AND NYT ABOUT HOW ANGRY WE REALLY ARE!" was actually incorrect and there is a real "Trump turn on Israel/Netanyahu"?
Well first of all, the standard for determining that is not the countless bullshit fake "leaks" you will see coming out in the next period that are nothing but empty words, rhetoric, meaningless whining, the purpose of which I have already explained.
The standard in actually determining that has happened is material action. Real, material action. And in this case, that means that there is an actual Iran deal that prevents a war, which will by necessity include a cessation of what is a war going on now by the US-NATO-Israeli Lebanese proxy "state" against Hezbollah and also the same in Iraq and Yemen, and also in Gaza with Hamas.
That will mean that an actual "permanent ceasefire" has been established between the US-NATO-Israeli empire and the Axis of Resistance, and there will be no war, at least not in the short-term, by which I mean by the end of this year.
Now if that happens, it means that the Zionist US-NATO-Israeli empire is actually much weaker than I had assumed it to be, as it had determined that it is incapable of fighting a war with Iran, and it was convinced that an attack on its nuclear sites would lead to a war given Iran's retaliation to it.
But so far I have only been wrong in the other direction, in overestimating the deterrent capacities of Iran and the Axis of Resistance, which has turned out to be much weaker than I had thought it to be, and that was based solely on the unwillingness of Iran to actually follow through on its own stated claims, not due to any lack in material capacities. Btw, the Mossad was definitely behind the killing of Iran's president too, and that entire list of deranged Israeli actions just went completely unanswered. They even participated in covering up the killing of their own president because they didn't want to have to be forced into actual retaliation by admitting it was Mossad.
Yeah, that's actually pretty shocking. I was wrong there, and I admitted I was wrong in the wake of Nasrallah's assassination which was the direct result of this.
And this only strengthens my view that the US-NATO-Israeli empire will definitely imminently attack Iran, and actually, I'm not even sure that Iran would follow through on its red line and do a real retaliation to it.
It's very possible they will just do another bullshit symbolic "True Promise" strike and leave it at that, in which case it's just over. To be fair, it was pretty much already over with the assassination of Nasrallah and the lack of any real response to that, but by that point you can just accept that there is no such thing as an "Axis of Resistance" and that Iran has been decisively defeated as a counter-force to US-NATO-Israeli Zionist hegemony in the region of any significance.
to be clear Hamas was entirely justified in eliminating the Zionist Israeli rape-soldier concentration camp guard Eden Alexander on October 7. The fact they didn't but instead sustained him as their own people are genocided, starved and raped shows how humane and moral they are
it's amazing how the entire Western media and political class transforms genocidal Zionist rape-soldiers who are enforcing an illegal occupation into Holy Saints, and if you dare touch a hair on their head it's the worst crime in history. Bernie Sanders:
one of the tactics they use to launder these genocidal Zionist rape-soldiers is to only show them in civilian clothing. So rape-soldiers are Holy Saint Innocents, but everyone in the Palestinian resistance is a Pure Evil Monster who must be mass murdered