The third year of the Russian full-scale invasion begins, and Ukraine is facing multiple difficulties. There's no room for optimism, as many problems can’t be solved in the coming months.
In this thread: Issues, threats and the future. 1/
While Ukraine was on the offensive in 2023, Russia silently amassed significant forces. Since mid-October, Russians have been attacking on multiple fronts. At the same time, Ukraine faces both external and internal challenges. Let’s start with the Ukrainian problems. 2/
Ukraine experienced unfortunate losses in 2023. The summer offensive was costly, but it didn’t reach any strategic goals. After the summer, the losses were increasingly difficult to fully replace. The military leadership likely saw the incoming problems. 3/
Towards the end of 2023, public disputes regarding new mobilization laws surfaced. The military leadership and President Zelenskyi disagreed on how many men should be mobilized. There was a lack of urgency in decision-making, even though the manpower issue had to be solved. 4/
Ukraine is currently preparing new mobilization laws, but their enactment will take until late spring. Recruits will likely have a month or two to settle their affairs before their military service, and the training of the new soldiers will take at least two months. 5/
However, two months of military training is not much. Minimal training will result in inadequately prepared troops and unnecessary losses. Fresh troops will likely start arriving at the front around late summer, which means Russia has a window of opportunity in the spring. 6/
Ukraine's ability to influence external aid is limited, and many variables impact the long-term support, especially the upcoming US elections. The EU is boosting its production capacity and utilizing available stocks, but it's yet insufficient to meet all of Ukraine's needs. 7/
The manpower issues in Ukraine are self-inflicted. While the need for reinforcements has been apparent, political and military priorities haven't aligned. Concerns over the massive costs of the mobilization are valid, but answering core problem is unavoidable. 8/
Russia understands the challenges Ukraine faces and is already actively exploiting them. While initial results of the ongoing winter offensive were modest, an increasing number of villages and towns fell to the aggressor from late January onwards, most notably Avdiivka. 9/
Russia is attacking on multiple fronts simultaneously, searching for weaknesses. This approach comes at a cost, but Russia is prepared to tolerate significant losses. There may not be as favorable conditions for success again after the Ukrainian mobilization. 10/
Russians also know that even if a certain sector of their front is weakened because of high losses, Ukraine can’t exploit the situation with an unexpected, larger counterattack, as they lack the resources to do that in the coming months. 11/
Despite ongoing attacks since October, Russia hasn't achieved deep breakthroughs. While some local defences have bent or fallen, there's been no widescale Ukrainian collapse. Russians likely presume that the attrition warfare will eventually bring more results. 12/
It should also be noted that there are large forces that Russia has not committed to the fight yet. It has likely calculated that the offensives can continue for many weeks or months, and if more significant progress is achieved somewhere, they’re prepared to support it. 13/
I’m not predicting a major collapse, but there are some echoes from the 2022 Kharkiv counteroffensive - in reverse. Slow response to critical issues, increased enemy capabilities and challenges with external actors create a risky situation with possible negative outcomes. 14/
This spring is about survival. Ukraine still faces existential threats, and various scenarios remain possible. Pessimism should guide policymakers, and especially all aid plans should align with worst-case scenarios. Crisis awareness should match that of early 2022. 15/
In short: For months, Ukrainian brigades will have to fight undermanned, and they can also accomplish less because of limited resources. Russia knows that it has superiority in men, equipment and firepower, and they're not afraid of losses if there's ground to be gained. 16/
Our team at @Black_BirdGroup will continue to map and analyze the war in Ukraine, both in traditional and social media. @J_JHelin and @Inkvisiit have great threads in preparation, follow them.
I watched Tucker Carlson’s interview with Putin. It exemplifies how a person who thinks too much of himself is put into the position of a useful idiot.
Dictators aren't interested in truth or journalism; those who think otherwise are only deceiving themselves. 1/ 🧵
Carlson's bias is well-known. He has repeatedly criticized Western media and leaned towards the Russian narrative.
Even though there was no critical element involved in the interview, he may have genuinely thought he still could get something valuable out of it. 2/
For me, the expectations were low. Everything Putin said was predictable, as is often the case with dictators. All the talking points have been heard before. The end result was a boring lecture, where Carlson was unable and likely also unwilling to challenge Putin. 3/
Russian operations in the Kupiansk direction have continued with varying intensity for months.
Russian gains have been very limited, but this evening the Russians announced that they have taken the village of Krokhmalne. 1/6
Ukrainians have also reported continuous Russian attacks in the Synkivka area. Despite Russian efforts, they haven't been able to punch through Synkivka, which would be the shortest route to Kupiansk.
There's also no indication of Russians continuing far beyond Krokhmalne. 2/
Krokhmalne, a small village with only a handful of houses, is the first Ukrainian village the Russians have been able to capture anywhere in months.
It's worth noting that they actually re-captured it, as Ukraine liberated the village in autumn 2022 (and took some POWs too). 3/
Ukrainian operations on the eastern bank of the Dnipro river, in the village of Krynky, have been ongoing since October 2023.
In this thread, I'll analyze the current situation and the future of the bridgehead in Krynky.
The thread includes high-resolution satellite images. 1/
A brief timeline of the events in the Dnipro River Delta since the liberation of Kherson. The “river war” has been a long process, often conducted in challenging conditions.
However, it has not generally been discussed as much in the media as some other sectors. 2/
In the village of Krynky, Ukrainian forces have been fighting a difficult battle for a prolonged time. The area controlled by Ukraine is small and natural cover is very limited. There is a forest next to the village, but it seems the Ukrainians have not advanced far into it. 3/
This very interesting video has been circulating in the social media for a couple of days. A few observations:
1. Russians have tried to attack in the same area before, and have lost about half a company of tanks. For some reason, they believe this time will be different. 🧵
2. When zooming in the first tank, I'm not quite sure if the mine clearing equipment on the right side of the tank is 100% in order.
3. It also seems that the tank drives into a line of mines, which have not been hidden in any way - just quickly laid on the ground.
4. From a wider perspective, an additional destroyed vehicle can be seen in the middle of another uncovered row of suspected anti-tank mines.
There's no need to hide everything if the Russians still drive straight into them. It’s also not the first time we see such actions.
As 2024 begins, the war in Ukraine continues. A thread about how some last year's key developments will shape this year.
First, the numbers: According to our estimate, Russia occupied roughly 18.26 % of Ukraine on 1.1.2023. A year later, Russia occupies a bit over 18.27 %. 1/
In the context of gaining ground, capturing Bakhmut and its surrounding towns was the most central accomplishment of the year for the Russians.
However, the strategic meaning of this event was rather limited, and Russia has not been able to significantly continue from there. 2/
Other Russian advances during the year were mostly limited to a handful of towns or villages. Russians managed to create an encirclement threat in Avdiivka during the year, but after massive losses, they still have not succeeded to break Ukraine's defences around the city. 3/
As usual, a vatnik spreads lies about how most Finns perceive their history.
Especially the outcome of the Winter War should be weighed against the Soviet goals. Independence remained, Soviet losses were high and they had to change their objectives for the whole operation. 1/
Finland fought hard and managed to stop the Soviet offensives in multiple directions both in 1939-40 and in 1944. Sometimes this is referred as a "defensive victory". We remember that with pride and make memes of it now, but it came with a heavy price for a small nation. 2/
Finland lost some important ares, but it survived WW2 without the typical signs of a Soviet victory in eastern Europe - such as mass deportations, executions, rape, looting and decades of poverty without independence, democracy or civil rights. 3/