South Korea has the lowest fertility rate in the world at a mere 0.7 births per woman. But ๐ฐ๐ท is not alone. Several regions have fertility well below 1.
A look at places with ultra-low birthrates, how they got there, and some lessons for all of us.
Important ๐งต, please share!
To begin with, let's dispense with a misconception. Although all of Europe struggles with low birth rates and aging populations, Europe is not facing 'lowest-of-low' fertility rates that are now seen in parts of Asia. (Map by @landgeist, table by @BirthGauge.) 2/14
The places with the lowest fertility rates in the world? South Korea of course, as this map by @nonebusinesshey shows. But also a bunch of regions in China. And Taiwan, Singapore and Bangkok, Thailand, all well below 1 birth per woman.
What do they all have in common? 3/14
First, all have adopted ultra-dense housing configurations. Here is Macao, with a fertility rate that was just 0.58 births per woman in 2023. Seoul, with a TFR of just 0.54, is just as dense.
Such extreme density is not necessary. Most of Korea is sparsely populated! 4/14
From the American Community Survey, we know that housing type dramatically impacts fertility rates, with tall towers having the lowest fertility of all. (HT @Indian_Bronson). 5/14
Second, all of the ultra-low fertility places once had strong population control propaganda and programs, which have not been matched in enthusiasm by pro-family messages since.
Here are old propaganda posters from China and Korea urging small families. The messages stuck! 6/14
Third is a culture of "workism", placing work above all else.
Korea and China wowed the world with their rapid growth, but family life has been crushed. In Korea, the govt. tried to raise the work week to 69 hours! In China, migrant workers are far from family supports. 7/14
We want to think of capitalism as always good, but there is a big risk. As @philippilk writes in American Affairs, the pull of work itself can cause fertility collapse. That happened when formerly Communist countries embraced free markets, and it's happening in Asia today. 8/14
Fourth, all the ultra-low birthrate countries once relied on arranged marriage, and haven't adjusted well to its disappearance. This chart for Japan would be similar in ๐จ๐ณ and ๐ฐ๐ท. Meanwhile marriage rates have plunged. 9/14
(Charts by and The Economist). web-japan.org
How much of a difference does this make?
Likely a lot. In North Korea where arranged marriage is still the norm, 96% of adults age 30+ are married and the fertility rate in the North is more than twice as high as in the South. 10/14
Turning the question around, what are some ways to boost fertility, for the ultra-low-fertility countries and for everyone else?
First is lower density housing that is still linked to economic hubs. ๐บ๐ธ and ๐ฆ๐บ show the way, as this thread explains. 11/14
Second is explicit pro-natal messaging. Countries including Israel, France, Hungary, Mongolia and Japan all suggest this makes a difference. But the coolest example is Georgia. As @lymanstoneky showed, Patriarch Ilia II urged couples in ๐ฌ๐ช to have more kids, and they did! 12/14
Third is work-life balance. Europe has for decades strived to achieve this, and its fertility rates haven't fallen to the ultra-low levels of East Asia. Work from home helps. This chart by Lyman Stone reveals that those w/remote work will have more kids than those without. 13/14
Last is bringing back arranged marriage, at least as one option. Countries that retain a culture of arranged marriage, like Israel and India, are doing much better demographically than those that lost that tradition. 14/14
(Follow @MoreBirths for more solutions to this crisis!)
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A wonderful paper by Spears et al. showed that population reduction would have almost no impact on climate change.
Why? The main reason is that a baby born today will emit much less carbon than someone born a generation ago, and their children will emit even less carbon. ๐งต
Most previous forecasts of how population would impact climate assumed that carbon emissions would continue at the same rate indefinitely.
But per-capita carbon consumption has been falling sharply and will fall even faster in the future as renewable energy takes over. 2/4
Meanwhile, because of population momentum, total population takes decades to change meaningfully.
By the time depopulation kicks in, per capita carbon emissions will be much lower than they are today, and so the climate impacts of population by then will be much lower. 3/4
Knowing birthrates are driven by a stack of factors lets us figure out what is happening in each country and what its ๐ถ bottlenecks are.
Things like beliefs about children, marriage, housing conditions, religiosity, work culture and more all have a big impact.
๐งต, please share!
In Spain (TFR 1.12), big hurdles include a huge fraction of young people living with their parents (driven by relatively poor employment for young people), the high share of housing that is small apartments, and declining faith among the young. 2/13
Poland (TFR 1.11) has a culture that is obsessive about work, with the longest work hours in Europe. After the fall of Communism, almost 70% of young Poles regularly practiced religion; today, less than 25% do. Housing is small and crowded. 3/13
Fertile No More!
For more than a hundred years, Ireland was both the most religious and the most fertile country in Europe.
But in recent years, Ireland experienced rapid secularization, and its fertility fell to just 1.47 in 2024.
What happened to ๐ฎ๐ช, and what comes next?
๐งต!
First, a bit of history.
By the 1800s, Ireland had become almost entirely reliant on just one crop. Potato blight struck in 1845, and soon famine and mass migration cut the Irish population from 8 million down to 4. Ireland's population is still well below its 1845 peak. 2/7
Ireland gained independence in 1921, and Catholicism was central to Irish identity, partly in defiance of protestant England.
For most of the 20th century, ๐ฎ๐ช was deeply religious, with church attendance above 90%.
The Irish idealized large families, and fertility was high! 3/7
Getting old without ever getting rich
Thailand, with a TFR of just 0.95 in 2024, never even had a chance to get rich before its birthrate collapsed.
A look at how over-zealous family planning combined with cultural factors to put ๐น๐ญ on a demographic downward spiral.
New ๐งต!
Unlike its neighbors Korea and Taiwan, Thailand with a per-capita GDP of just $7000 never got to get rich before facing ultra-low birthrates.
For Thailand, the biggest cause was family planning run amok.
(Below, a wedding dress in Thailand made of entirely of condoms!) 2/9
The father of Thai birth control is Mechai Viravaidya, an enthusiastic family planner who led round after round of family planning efforts. As its birthrates plunged, Thailand was lauded as a huge success.
But then these efforts blew far past the mark. When Thailand hosted the International Conference on Family Planning in 2022, its fertility was already down to 1.01 and still dropping fast. With January 2025 data already reported, Thai births were down another 8.4% from January 2024.
Here is Viravaidya posing proudly with a tree made out of... Guess what? 3/9
The fastest fertility collapse in the world
In 2024 Chile recorded a fertility rate of just 0.88 births per woman, a drop of 23% in a year and 51% since 2015. No country has seen fertility fall as fast.
A look at how social changes have overwhelmed ๐จ๐ฑ and threaten its future.
๐งต!
In recent years, Chile has been wracked with protest. In 2018, there were some 151 feminist protests across the country.
Then from 2019 to 2021, these mixed with large youth-led anti-establishment protests, which turned violent and often resulted in brutal police responses. 2/7
In the aftermath of the protests and the subsequent crackdown, many women have sworn off of childbearing, and anti-natal beliefs have taken hold.
This has analogues to South Korea's gender tension and its notorious 4B movement (women rejecting dating, sex, marriage & kids). 3/7
South Dakota has the highest fertility of any US state and is the only state near replacement fertility.
Why is the birthrate so high in South Dakota and what lessons are there for the rest of America and the world?
๐งต, please share!
First is religiosity. Some 50% of South Dakotans rate religion as very important in their lives, well above the US average of around 37%.
Higher religiosity is associated with higher fertility both in the US and worldwide. 2/10
Second is social values. South Dakota is one of the most conservative states in America, and conservatism is strongly associated with higher fertility in the US, both for states and at the county level. 3/10