Art Deco is the incarnation of civilizational energy—the spirit of Achilles and Tesla in architectural form.
The ultimate style for high civilization...
Kenneth Clarke said:
“Vigour, energy, vitality: all the civilizations—or civilizing epochs—have had a weight of energy behind them.”
Art Deco embodies this vitality.
He claimed civilization had 3 enemies:
"First of all fear — fear of war, fear of invasion, fear of plague and famine, that make it simply not worthwhile constructing things, or planting trees or even planning next year’s crops."
Does this look fearful to you?
Art Deco often features exotic materials, such as ebony and ivory, and exquisite craftsmanship.
The fruits of a culture unafraid to try new things.
The next enemy is a lack of self-confidence. A culture regrets its past, stifling its ability to progress.
Art Deco's blocky, muscular designs show a civilization secure yet determined. Its aura is simultaneously ancient and futuristic.
A timeless spirit of crushing grandeur.
So many Art Deco designs look like they could be 5,000 years old. It's an artistic style that appreciates a civilization's past.
Finally Clarke warns against exhaustion:
"the feeling of hopelessness which can overtake people even with a high degree of material prosperity."
Art Deco's imagery is all about vitalism. God-like men, exalted maidens, mythical beasts—dreams of a civilization with a vision.
Art Deco embodies faith in social and technological progress.
It fosters a belief that the best is yet to come.
We need to be Art-Deco-maxing as a civilization.
It's the architectural style of a people who've triumphed—and aren't done yet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alexander the Great’s tomb has been missing for centuries. Over 140 official attempts have been made to locate it. All have failed.
But one rogue historian thinks he’s finally found it.
He claims everyone's been looking in the wrong place…🧵
Alexander’s body wasn’t always missing. We know that figures like Julius Caesar, Cleopatra, and Augustus visited his tomb in Alexandria during the 1st century BC.
But somewhere along the way it disappears from the record…
By the time St. John Chrysostom visited Alexandria in 400 AD, he was unable to locate the tomb and said of Alexander "his tomb even his own people know not.”
There are a few mentions of the tomb afterward, but nothing reliable, and as of today no one knows where it is.
Early Christians had a complete Bible by the 4th century—but that’s not the only thing they were reading to deepen their faith.
Here’s what books the early Church read besides the Bible🧵
1. The Didache, Anonymous, 1st cent.
The Didache is a brief discourse that contains moral and ritualistic teachings—a handbook for a Christian life.
It’s speculated the apostles wrote it, and contains the formulas for baptism and eucharist that are still used today.
2. The Shepherd of Hermas, Hermas, 2nd cent.
St. Iranaeus considered it to be canonical scripture. Though it missed the cut, it’s a fascinating work that centers around the life of a former slave who's given mystical visions and parables informing him how to live a faithful life
At least, that's what the “divine right of kings” doctrine claims.
To modern ears it might seem absurd, but it actually has Biblical roots…🧵 (thread)
Simply put, the divine right of kings is a political/religious doctrine that asserts kings are granted authority by God.
In its strongest form, monarchs are not subject to the will of the people, parliament, or any other human institution.
The doctrine was formalized with 16th and 17th century thinkers like Bishop Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet, who claimed “the royal throne is not the throne of a man, but the throne of God himself.”
But kings had been claiming divine authority since Biblical times…
Many people blame the so-called “dark ages” on Christianity — they claim the Church was an overbearing force that stifled innovation.
But in the chaos after the fall of Rome, the Church was actually a *civilizing* force that reintroduced order...🧵
The idea of the “Dark Ages” first emerged with the 14th c. scholar Petrarch. He contrasted the “darkness” of the years after the Roman Empire’s collapse with the “light” of the Classical age, led by Greece and early Rome.
Cardinal Baronius further popularized the idea in the 1600's when looking back to the turn of the millennium. However, he used the Latin “saeculum obscurum” in a limited sense for the scarcity of writings between the Carolingian Empire (888 AD) and the Gregorian Reform (1046 AD).
You’re at the bottom rung of society—bound to the land with limited social mobility…
But life isn’t all bad. Here’s what it looks like🧵
Even compared to the glorified Roman Empire, the average “Dark Age” peasant likely saw lower taxes, more freedom, and a weaker ruling class under the Manorial system—a type of Feudalism where peasants worked the land under a lord.
In this system, the manor was the epicenter of rural life, often surrounded by several hundred acres, hovels, a church, and community grain mill.
The lord of the manor was usually a bishop or abbot of the local church, or a wealthy noble.