Defense Minister Gallant’s announcement this evening he will only agree to pass a law on IDF draft with agreement of all the parties of the emergency coalition is the biggest political threat to Netanyahu since he returned to office. It creates an impossible situation for the PM>
The government has only weeks to pass a law regulating the exemption of yeshiva students from the draft. If they don’t table a law, the Supreme Court will force the Defense Ministry to start drafting them. But there’s no way Benny Gantz can agree the blanket exemptions remain >
Gallant’s announcement was coordinated with Gantz. If they oppose the law, and there’s no law they and the Haredi parties can agree on, it’s hard to see how the coalition musters the votes. It still has 63 votes without Gallant and Gantz’s party, but other Likudniks will rebel >
If a law isn’t tabled and the IDF has to start press-ganging yeshiva students (it doesn’t want to, but it won’t have a choice), the Haredi parties will have to leave the government. There isn’t a compromise to be found here. Without the Haredim, Netanyahu loses his majority >
The brilliance of the Gallant-Gantz move is that while a large majority of Israelis want Netanyahu to leave, they’re not so eager for a wartime election. But an early election being held because the Haredim refuse to serve in the war will likely be popular with most Israelis >
Holding an early election because Netanyahu’s allies refuse to serve is a dream scenario for anyone who wants to replace him. There is no issue in Israel right now with a broader consensus upon which to bring down the government. Even during a war.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What’s happening in the last two days is Netanyahu consciously squandering what little international support Israel has (mainly from the US) to continue the war against Hamas in a vain attempt to save his own political career by picking a fight with Biden> haaretz.com/israel-news/20…
This is the 3rd time Netanyahu has tried to leverage a dispute with a US president for domestic political gain. He tried it with both Clinton and Obama. (He didn’t dare do it with Trump). It worked with Obama and failed with Clinton > haaretz.com/israel-news/20…
Netanyahu failed to leverage his dispute with Clinton because Clinton both stood up to Netanyahu and convinced Israelis he was pro-Israel at the same time. Clinton forced Netanyahu to accept the Wye Agreement and Netanyahu then lost the election in 1999 > haaretz.com/israel-news/20…
I find it hard to get excited over the hypocrisy of the university presidents. Maybe because I’m not American, never spent a day in university and don’t have higher expectations from educated people. But above all, I don’t think this has anything to do with the Israel-Hamas war >
There’s a crisis in western intelligentsia where ideas have become fashionable instead of profound, morals have become relative and too much value has been ascribed to words and it manifests itself in 1000s of issues in hypocrisy and a weakness in the face of right-wing populism>
It’s not a total coincidence that the moral vacuity at the heart of western progressive ideology has been exposed by the reaction to the Israel-Hamas war since there are so many grey-areas and blind-spots in the way the west sees it. But it could have happened over other issues >
A senior Israeli doctor, not military, just someone dedicated to healing people, called me and asked “why isn’t anyone reporting that a group of Israeli hospital directors offered to send in their own doctors to take all the premature babies from Shifa for treatment in Israel?” >
There are 3 reasons why. First, whoever is calling the shots in Shifa, I’ve no idea who that is, turned them down. I’ll leave you to speculate why they prefer to keep the babies in Shifa and are now planning to send them to much more distant and badly equipped hospitals in Egypt>
Second. Because, while the IDF passed on the proposal, were prepared to facilitate it and sort of acknowledged it when I asked, the Israeli government is far from eager to establish a precedent right now for treating Palestinians during war. So they’re not about to publicize it >
I wrote this 6 weeks ago, 24 hours since the war started and I’ve been thinking about it since. What were Hamas thinking and will there be a point that whoever is left of its leadership admits it made a massive strategic mistake? Or will they forever see October 7 as a victory? >
Put aside a moment your personal opinion of Israel’s response, whether you think its fully justified, flawed or downright evil. The result is now that Gaza City is in ruins and 1.5m Gazans have been displaced. And it was entirely predictable. Was Hamas predicting this? >
We can’t ask any Hamas leader now. Hamas-watchers I have been asking may not be the best people to ask since they all failed to see October 7 coming. But that’s what we have for now. The majority view is this was a massive strategic miscalculation by Hamas chief Yihya Sinwar >
I don’t think I’ve ever signed an open letter or petition before. I don’t see it as my role as a journalist. When I was initially asked to sign a week ago my automatic response was “I agree with every word but I don’t sign open letters.” And to be honest > chronicle.com/blogs/letters/…
A week ago, I was too busy reporting and writing. I didn’t fully realize or feel what those who originally drafted and signed the letter were feeling. It took another week for it to catch up with me. That there were people out there who we had regarded as friends and colleagues >
People who were denying our basic humanity by justifying, ignoring or relativizing the massacre of Israeli civilians. I started to realize only belatedly when I began asking myself, why hasn’t this or that person who were always quick to ask for my opinion or advice got in touch?
Netanyahu and sources within the defense establishment are briefing against each other. Netanyahu has been doing it for 2 weeks already, trying to place the sole blame on the IDF and Shin Bet for Hamas’ surprise attac. In the last 2 days he’s sending, through proxies, a new line>
Netanyahu’s new line attack on the generals (thru proxies) is that they don’t care enough for the lives of their soldiers and they’re prepared to send them into Gaza before the air-force has used bunker-busting bombs to destroy Hamas tunnels there. Now there’s counter-briefing >
In the briefing from the defense establishment they’re not attacking Netanyahu directly but they’re saying they did as ordered, called up reserves, secured Israel’s borders and prepared a force for the ground operation which has been waiting at peak-readiness for over a week now>