Metatron Profile picture
Feb 28, 2024 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Gnosticism and the Moustache 👨

Mandaeans, Yezidis, Yarsanis, Druze. The donning of a prominent Moustache among Religious Men, and not ordinary men in tribal fashion, is a part of esoteric symbolism and isn't coincidental. The Moustache is a religious statement in of itself.


Image
Image
Image
Image
The practice trails back to Manicheanism, Mani's Religion, hereticated by Zorastrians and Muslims as Zanadika. They were the Esoteric Gnostics of Persia, writing in Babylonian Aramaic. In Abbasid times, Zanadika practiced outward Islam, but kept their Esoteric beliefs. Image
The Zanadika were known to don prominent Moustaches in semblance to their Prophet Mani often depicted with one. Islamic Sharia had commanded احفو شواركم, Trim your Moustache, to separate Muslim Clerics from others(Persians/Syriacs). Salafis extreme Exoterics shaving it entirely.
Image
Image
Thus the antagonistic statement of proclaiming you did not Submit to Sharia and kept your old beliefs was the opposite, growing the Moustache out. The lips and esoteric truth concealed. Where in the Exoteric the Foundation(Chin) is concealed, but Lips/Sharia revealed.
Image
Image
As all gnostic religions listed have inspired from Manichaeism and ancient Persian Yazdanism. One can also find in the Moustache the symbolism of the Faravahar. Which is Ahura Mazda, the Mind/Light, Guardian Angel. The Mind for the Druze is also the Phoenix the Prime Masculine. Image
Genetically Kurdish and Levantine phenotypes promote thick moustaches naturally. And the Stache usually protrudes by its own merit. Without intentional beard-scaping. The Stache has also developed tribal affiliations with Honor and Masculinity. Donned by Chieftains as well.

Image
Image
Image
Thus any Eastern Gnostic must wear his Moustache with pride, knowing what it symbolizes.
A symbol of defiance and resistance and stubbornness in the face of tyranny or forced conversion.
Also the guardian angel wings of the Mind, and faith to the original light, Gnosis. Image
@UnrollHelper

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Metatron

Metatron Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Narreddine

Oct 20
🔴 Of the greatest libraries to have existed, the first University in history in the secular sense:
The Fatimid House of Knowledge, completed by Imam Al Hakim 11th Century AD.

Often described but never visualized, take a silent stroll in 11th Century Cairo with a student finding his class in the Dar Al Ilm Library.

My rendering and animation. Free to use.
Druze Heritage Series.
More on the Library Below. 👇
🔴 A young Imam Al Hakim had ordered the building of the greatest library of that time circa 1005 AD. Reaching according to sources 120000-200000 manuscripts, procured from all libraries of the world.

It was also designated to be place of teaching. Imam Al Hakim patroned the greatest scholars of the time, Al Hasan Ibn Al Haitham (the founder of optics), and Ibn Yunus a pioneering Astronomer. Lectures would be held on all subjects not only religious ones. As opposed to religious Universities like the Al Azhar University, also completed by the Imam. It was thus the closest in concept to a University in the modern secular sense of the word.

Furthermore, Al Hakim decreed that all castes of society could simply enter and seek learning, providing all ink and paper and fund. An early example of free education.

In a section of the University called Dar-et-Teb, House of Medicine, the first eye surgeries would be attempted. By surgeon Ammar Ibn Ali Al Mausili.

In a section called Dar-e-Nissa, House of Women, women would be allowed all learning.

The Druze faith elevates Ma'rifa, knowledge, as the main ladder of ascendance.
🔴 Ibn Al Haitham (Al Hazen) would there invent the first camera, the camera obscura.
He would also the first diagrams of the eye. Inventing there also the first lenses and reading glasses.

A pioneering astronomical chart, Al-Zij-Al-Hakimi would also be drawn there by Ibn Yunus.
The Sundial would be reinvented, as well as the advanced Pendulum.Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Oct 13
🔴 Lebanese Christian visionary Dr. Hisham Bou Nassif @Hbounassif writes an article titled: "Waiting for a Maronite Hikmat Hijri".

It is interesting how our Sheikh, despite the smearing campaigns, has become an icon of self-determination, courage against all odds, and decolonization.

I have translated Dr. Hisham's article to English below with the original Arabic linked.
tinyurl.com/3pj6bmrmImage
"The attempt by Syria’s Druze to detach themselves from Damascus carries great risks for them. The regional lines, Turkish and Arab, are against them. U.S. policy is not on their side. And within Syria, the Sunni majority is mobilized against “partition and federalism.” Therefore, Hikmat al-Hijri’s project carries within it a major gamble.

Nevertheless, it is enough to read the text of the Syrian constitutional declaration signed by Ahmad al-Sharaa in Damascus last March to realize that al-Hijri has no choice but to do what he is doing. The constitutional declaration made Islam the religion of the head of state, and Islamic jurisprudence the main source of legislation. Now, since traditional Islam (let alone Islamism) does not consider the Druze to be Muslims, the constitution guarantees that the Druze of Syria will remain marginalized in both state and society if their fate continues to be tied to that of the country.

Consequently, if al-Hijri’s attempt to break away from the Sunni-majority consciousness is a risky endeavor, surrendering to those who condemn an entire group of people to live in humiliation as a lower-class community simply because of their religious affiliation would be suicide.

Therefore, there is no serious alternative for the Druze of Syria other than what Hikmat al-Hijri is trying to do. I have been following what he says for some time, and I find him clear and courageous. In 1982, the Israeli army rid Lebanon of the tumor that was the Palestine Liberation Organization, but none of us thanked it, even though Yasser Arafat’s black record against our country was rivaled only by that of Hafez al-Assad. By contrast, Hikmat al-Hijri openly thanked Israel for protecting his community.

In contrast to a century of wooden Christian rhetoric in Lebanon, Hikmat al-Hijri declares that he does not trust the intentions of the Islamic regime in Damascus toward his sect, and that the guarantee of its future is the establishment of a separate region. In doing so, al-Hijri is right twice over: first, because he refuses to place his trust in those who do not deserve it; and second, because he understands that the politics of dissimulation and compromise cannot last forever. A day must come when living peoples must confront their fate if they wish to survive — and for Syria’s Druze, that day has arrived.

...Image
The same applies to Lebanon’s Christians. Not necessarily in the form of a war, they are weary of that, but in the form of the honesty required first with themselves, and then with others. Honesty demands that Christians express publicly what they often say in private: that handing over the neck of their community to the darlings of the regional axes in Lebanon is effectively handing it over to those same axes, something they reject.

True, not all of these axes are equally bad, and none are as malign, past or present, as Iran’s mullahs. But all of these axes are, ultimately, alien to their society. Therefore, they do not recognize the legitimacy of their brazen and continuous interference in Lebanon’s affairs. And if there are those in Lebanon who are comfortable with these axes, there are also those who are not. The solution, therefore, is for Christians to govern themselves, within a clearly defined geographical area of their own, controlling their own foreign policy based on total neutrality toward a surrounding environment whose intentions, values, and deep identity they distrust, and with which they wish to have only mercantile relations.

They are ready to abandon even those if the price is political submission. This is the solution that most Christians want for themselves, and for the other peoples of Lebanon, each within their own territory.

It is well known that the original pact between Lebanon’s peoples was supposed to be founded on the principle of “Neither East nor West.” Yet this pact has been violated a thousand times over, always by the “friends of the East.” The Shiite expansion, backed by Iran in recent decades, is only one link in a long chain of dependence on foreign powers that others began long before them, and the Christian people have grown tired of it.

If they are unwilling to try again with their neighbors, it is not because they are extremist or “isolationist,” but because they have lost thousands of their best young men in wars they feel they did nothing to justify, and hundreds of thousands of emigrants swallowed by exile during and after the war, whose mere right to vote is now begrudged them by Shiite resentment, embodied by Nabih Berri.

Therefore, the peoples of Lebanon must be honest with one another. Indeed, they would have been, had there been among the Christians their own version of Hikmat al-Hijri, someone who would decisively break with the stale “Lebanonist” rhetoric that most Christians can no longer stand. But such a Christian Hikmat al-Hijri does not exist. And because he does not, the discourse of Lebanon’s ruling Christian elites. both ecclesiastical and political, remains a broken record, repeating itself endlessly. The future, therefore, remains uncertain and unsettling, even if the dull present is occasionally interrupted by fleeting and illusory moments of relief."Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 20
🟥 The Fall of Nadine Barakat🧵
خريف نادين بركات (و توضيح الخلاف)

🟥 Who funds Nadine
🟥 Hostage of the Sunni Extremist Right
🟥 Light Nadine and Shadow Nadine
🟥 The Recruitment of the Julia Complex
🟥 How to Fight Back

It pains me to write this thread, given I care about Nadine, but I care more about what is right.
What she has been doing in the dark must be brought to the light. And she must be held accountable so she could at least stop.
So here are some necessary disclosures about Nadine.
After which I will probably abandon the subject.Image
🟥 Who Funds Nadine

Nadine is being funded directly by elements in the US Administration. However we have learned that these particular elements are not the official Trump team as she shares, but Wahhabi Pro-Jihadi elements. The Saudi Lobby in the US Administration. Bought souls.
This group is also the main insider for Samir Geagea in the US Admin, hence the shared narrative and harmony.
🟥 Hostage of the Sunni Extremist Right

Given Nadine went headfirst in opposing Hezbollah and the deep state of the left(which we credit and appreciate), she was rained with malevolent lawsuits in the US, with egregious numbers and penalties. Nadine could not financially or legally handle all these lawsuits, and risked jailtime.
The only party offering her legal protection was the Saudi Lobby in US Admin and consequently the Sunni Extremist Right. So she became a slave to their narrative out of necessity. I.e. a legally kept hostage.
This became vastly more problematic when they asked her to deny the Druze narrative and genocide. A major conflict of interest, in which she took the worst choice.Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 24
🟥 تفكيك سردية "اليمين السني": ركائزه الأساسية، وكيف يتم خداعنا 🧵

🟥 ما يحدث في المشرق لم يعد صراعًا بين اليمين واليسار، أو بين محور ومحور، حيث إن اليسار وحليفه إيران/حزب الله قد هُزِموا إلى حد كبير على يد إسرائيل، حتى أصبحوا في حالة خضوع وتهميش.

قراءة أفضل لهذا المشهد هي أنه في الحقيقة "صراع الأيمنة".

وأحد هذه الأجنحة اليمينية، وهو اليمين السني، يتبنى أيديولوجيا إسلاموفاشية اختارت طريق الإبادة الجماعية للوصول إلى السلطة. 1/Image
Image
Image
🟥 يجب أولاً دحض الوهم القائل بوجود يمين عالمي موحّد. في الواقع، هناك عدة أجنحة لليمين تختلف اختلافًا طبيعيًا بسبب اختلاف أسسها الفكرية والجذرية، فاليَمين بطبيعته يرتكز على الأصول والمبادئ المؤسسة.

ولا يوجد من بين نماذج الحكم سوى الفيدرالية ما يمكنه أن يحل توترات اليمين دون قسر أو حرب، ويضمن إلى حد ما السلم. أما اليمين السني، الذي يتمحور حول التطرف الديني، فيتخذ النهج الفاشي المتطرف في الحكم.

وأي تصور لمركزية السلطة تحت هيمنة اليمين السني يعني بالضرورة الاضطهاد، والإكراه، وكما هو واضح في سوريا: الإبادة الجماعية.Image
🟥 فيما يتعلق بركائز سردية "اليمين السني" والرد عليها:

الركيزة الأولى:
🟥 المبالغة في دور إيران وحزب الله إلى ما يتجاوز الواقع والمنطق. ويتم ذلك غالبًا من خلال نظريات المؤامرة، مثل السردية الخيالية القائلة إن "داعش هي إيران".
في حين أنه من الممكن أن تكون إيران والنظام السوري قد استثمرا في تنظيم داعش لقتل وتشتيت فصائل المعارضة السورية أثناء الحرب الأهلية، فإن أحمد الشرع (الجولاني) ومجموعته هم بالضبط الأشخاص الذين تم الاستثمار فيهم.

وقد ورد أن القافلة الأولى للجولاني التي سُمح لها من قبل النظام السوري بالذهاب إلى إدلب، رفعت أعلام حزب الله والنظام في ذلك الوقت.
إن الغرض من هذه المبالغة هو إخفاء الحقيقة الأوضح: داعش هي داعش، هذه هي الحقيقة المباشرة والبسيطة. آلاف من عناصر قوات النظام السوري الجديد يضعون شارات داعش، ويتصرفون ويرتكبون الجرائم ويهتفون تمامًا مثل داعش.
أما الجولاني، فما هو إلا نسخة مُعاد تسويقها من داعش.

اليمين السني يستخدم سردية "داعش هي إيران" كخداع وتمويه. يفضلون المؤامرة على الحقيقة.

في الواقع، إيران تشبه الضبع المترنّح في المنطقة أكثر من كونها دولة عقل مدبّر تدير الأحداث.
إيران غير قادرة حتى على حماية مصافيها النفطية داخل أراضيها.
وحزب الله عاجز عن إعادة بناء منزل مدمر، فكيف بإطلاق صاروخ!
وحدها إسرائيل قادرة على إذلالهم عسكريًا بالكامل.
الأعداء الزائفون وغير الأكفّاء يتم تضخيمهم لإخفاء الأعداء الحقيقيين والخطرين.
والحقيقة أن إيران متحالفة فعليًا مع الجولاني من خلال حليفهما المشترك: تركيا (وقد زار الرئيس الإيراني تركيا مؤخرًا).
كما أن إيران أدانت الغارات الجوية الإسرائيلية على دمشق في محاولة منها لبناء جسور التقارب مع الجولاني.

داعش هي داعش. الحقيقة البسيطة تنتصر على المؤامرة.Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Jul 24
🟥 Deconstructing the Narrative of the "Sunni Right". Its main staples, and how we are being deceived.🧵

🟥What is happening in the Levant is no longer a battle between Right and Left, or Axis and Axis, as the Left and its ally Iran/Hezbollah have mostly been defeated by Israel to acquiescence and irrelevance.
A better reading of the scenario is that it is in fact a Battle of Right Wings.

With one of the Right Wings, the Sunni Right, being an Islamo-fascist ideology choosing the genocidal path to power. 1/Image
Image
Image
🟥 One must first refute the illusion that there is one Universal Right Wing. There are many Right Wings that are in natural opposition due to having different foundational bases. Given the Right is naturally fundamental; refers to origin.

Only Federalism among the paradigms of power can solve Right Wing tensions without coercion or warfare, and ensure Right Wing pacifism to an extent. The Sunni Right hinging on religious extremism at its core takes the extreme fascist approach to rule.

Any notion of centralism with the Sunni Right automatically means persecution, coercion, and evidently in Syria: Genocide.Image
🟥 As for the Staples of the Narrative of the Sunni Right and their refutation:
Staple 1:

🟥 The Exaggeration of the Role of Iran and Hezbollah beyond any reality or common sense. This is usually through conspiracies such as the "ISIS is Iran" fictional narrative. While Iran and Assad might have invested in ISIS to kill and scramble Syrian Opposition forces in the Syrian Civil War, Ahmad Al Shareh (Al Julani) and his entourage are the exact people they had invested into. His Assad-allowed first convoy to Idlib was reported to have raised Hezbollah and Assadist flags then.

The exaggeration of this narrative is to hide the truer notion that ISIS is ISIS. The direct unadulterated truism. As thousands of Syrian Government Forces wear ISIS patches, behave and commit crimes and chant exactly like ISIS. That Al Julani is only a rebranded ISIS figure. The Sunni RIght uses the ISIS is Iran narrative for subterfuge. Conspiracy over truism.

Iran is more the dying Hyena of the region, rather than a plotting mastermind state orchestrating events. Iran can't even protect its domestic refineries. Hezbollah can't build back a destroyed house let alone fire a rocket. Israel alone can fully shame their forces.

Fake incompetent enemies are exaggerated to hide real menacing enemies. Iran is in fact allied with Al Julani through their common ally Turkey(Iran's President was there recently). Iran even condemned the Israeli airstrikes on Damascus to build the bridge with him.

ISIS is ISIS. Truism trumps over conspiracy.Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
May 16
🟥من هو ابو ابراهيم (ص) عند الدروز؟ 🧵
و لماذا ننادي عليه في الحروب؟

مولانا ابو ابراهيم اسماعيل بن محمد التميمي هو ثاني الحدود القدسية اي مولاي النفس في زمن المولى الحاكم في القرن ال 11 ميلادي. و النفس يُرمز لها بالأحمر الأرجواني في التقليد الدرزي.
الإمام حمزة (ص) يكنّي أبو ابراهيم ب أخنوح الأوان و ادريس الزمان و هرمس الهرامسة في رسالة تقليده, لافتا الى أدواره السابقة.
بعض الدروز ينادون عليه دون التعرّف على ما كان عليه. هنا لمحة موجزة عن مولانا ابو ابراهيم من خلال ما عُرف عنه و ما كَتب لنا.Image
🟥 عُرف عن مولانا أبو ابراهيم باجتماع الصفات فيه. فكان روحانياً, فيلسوفاً, عالماً, شاعراً و محارباً.

🔥 في الروحانية كتب مولانا أبو ابراهيم الرسائل 36 الى 40 في الحكمة الشريفة. و فيهم لخّص العقيدة الدرزية بإستعمال الفلسفة و العلم و الرموز. غير انه شرح اصعب المفاهيم في خصوص التجلّي و الصورة الوهمية. و ربط تاريخ تطوّر الأديان بتطوّر الجنين في الرحم. فتعتبر رسائله نموذجا للشرح.
🔥 في رسالة الشمعة رمز مولانا لمكانة كل الحدود القدسية من خلال تفاصيل الشمعة و موادها. و ترقّي الكثيف الى اللطيف.
🔥 في رسالة الزناد شرح مولانا العلاقة بين العقل الكلّي و النفس و تكوين الصور الروحانية (Spiritual Archetypes) من خلال قادح النار و الحجر.
🔥 في رسالة تقسيم العلوم قسّم مولانا العلوم الدنيوية و الروحانية. و شرح العلم الخامس و هو في باطن الباطن.
🔥 ختم رسائله في "شعر النفس" الذي يتلونه المشايخ في الخلوات كل خميس او ليلة الجمعة.Image
🟥 يوم القيامة يُعتبر ان أبو ابراهيم سيكون "خيّال الحرب" او صاحب الفرس الأحمر في سفر الرؤيا.
و هو الذي يأخذ بثأر الموحدين و يحشر ظالميهم الى النيران. و حينها تجري الدماء كالبحور و الأنهار.
لذا المناداة على أبو ابراهيم في الحروب هي كأنه الغائب الحاضر لنصرة الموحدين و تكون في الشدة حيث يأتي الخلاص في أوج صعوبة المحن و تنقلب الدفّة و يُردُّ السيف.Image
Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(