on February 21, the New York Times allowed Adam Sella, a recently graduated comp lit food blogger with zero reporting experience, to write a solo piece where he cites a "report" sayin there were "many cases of gang rape". But the report only mentions 3 which were already debunked
I have a question for @AdamSella1 and the New York Times. In what world are 3 instances of claimed gang rape, all three of which have been debunked and which reference Adam Sella himself, evidence of "many instances of gang rape"? What the fuck are you doing here, exactly?
another question for @AdamSella1 and the NYT: What happened to Yoni Saadon and his "girl with the face of an angel" from the Sunday Times and J Chronicle published weeks before your regurgitation of the "mass rape" hoax? You realized he was a bullshit artist, so you left him out
@AdamSella1 so Yoni Saadon, a deranged fantasist who claimed he saw "a girl with the face of an angel" being gang raped and then beheaded, destroying his testimony because no such case exists, was left out of the NYT by Adam Sella, but then he re-includes it months later via this "report"
Yoni Saadon was such a deranged fantasist that Adam Sella and his avowed genocidal uncle's wife Anat Schwartz didn't include him in their hoax, which they admitted they intentionally set out to fabricate because "it's important for Israeli propaganda"
but then months later, the New York Times lets Adam Sella write up his own solo piece where suddenly Yoni Saadon comes back to life, except now he launders it via this "Israeli Crisis-Rape Center" report. And he hoped no one would notice.
I noticed, Adam. You fucked up. Again.
as for the other two "testimonies" Adam Sella absurdly turned into "many cases of gang rape", the first is from known proven liar grifter Raz Cohen, who refused to speak to Gettleman, Sella and Schwartz in their pathetic "follow-up" damage control piece:
the second is from "Sapir", also a proven liar as detailed here: . Now there is an interesting scoop Sella, Schwartz and Gettleman had in their follow-up. They said "Israeli officials" told them they found 3 severed women's heads. Any updates on that?
now, no media elsewhere has reported on any women's severed heads being found. This follow-up piece to their hoax where Sella, Schwartz and Gettleman desperately tried to do some damage-control, is the only place where it is published. In the New York Times. Any updates at all?
there aren't any updates, because it's fucking bullshit. They made it up. "Israeli officials" is Anat Schwartz and Adam Sella's handlers telling them "yeah just write up bullshit about 3 heads being found to keep the Sapir bullshit up, who cares, no one will check."
I checked
so the NYT let Adam Sella fabricate its biggest hoax since Judith Miller with his genocidal uncle's wife Anat Schwartz and Jeffrey "I don't do evidence, I do stories" Gettleman, then allowed him to launder it via a "report" citing his own hoax. Insane
in their hoax, Sella, Schwartz and Gettleman used as their primary sources known, proven frauds like Cohen, Sapir, Mendes and Zaka, but Yoni Saadon and his "girl with the face of an angel" snuff fantasy went too far for even them. Then Sella cites him months later. Holy shit
they think no one will do basic checking of what they're doing. This is the so-called "paper of record", the highest journalistic standards, peak of Western Investigative Reporting. And this is what they do, let a food blogger try to the most pathetic scumfuckery imaginable
again I repeat: Minimal journalistic integrity and ethics demands of the NYT that it immediately fires Adam Sella, Anat Schwartz and Jeffrey Gettleman for fabricating its biggest hoax since Judith Miller, they retract the hoax, and they profusely apologize for what they did.
and again, the NYT's hoax was already debunked months ago. The Sella/Schwartz revelation merely focused attention on it. See:
this is amazing. The first story on the BBC's front page right now is the UN report which they lie about by omitting its mandate and conclusion, and beneath it they link back to their own piece on the "mass rape" hoax from December which the report debunks
this is among the most deranged things I've seen. They're lying so brazenly and shamelessly, expecting that no one will notice because they won't bother actually reading the report itself. They'll just read the BBC using it to launder their own hoax it conclusively disproves
I said this would happen, that the media class who collectively fabricated the "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax months ago, BBC, AP, Reuters, Guardian, and of course NYT, would now use it to launder their own hoax. But it's even worse than I thought, because it debunks it
BREAKING: The Intercept went back to check one of the main sources used by the New York Times' Anat Schwartz, Adam Sella and Jeffrey Gettleman in their "mass rape" hoax, and have shown it to have been a fraud. Again, the biggest hoax in NYT history since Judith Miller
in the full report, it becomes clear yet again that Anat Schwartz, Adam Sella and Jeffrey Gettleman deliberately set out to fabricate this atrocity propaganda hoax, with no regard at all to basic journalistic integrity and ethics. And the NYT stands by it
earlier today the UN report the entire media class and the New York Times itself is deceptively touting as vindication of their mass rape claims, in fact did the opposite, and further exposed the hoax fabricated in the NYT by Getleman, Sella and Schwartz:
the UN report by Pramila Padden has definitely exposed the New York Times' atrocity propaganda hoax. It states that core "witnesses" they used, Yossi Landau and Shari Mendes, who spread the fetus ripped out of a pregnant woman and stabbed claim, are liars. It's over now
the NYT fabricated a hoax which it just recently said it fully stands by, which the UN's Pramila Padden has said is patently false and has contradicted, both in its particulars and its central claim about "systematic mass rape".
it is now an established fact, not just from Mondoweiss, Electronic Intifada, Grayzone, myself, The Intercept more recently, but also the UN's Pramila Padden, that the NYT allowed Jeffrey Gettleman, Adam Sella and Anat Schwartz to fabricate a hoax built on an empire of lies
buried on page 15 in its 23 page "report", the UN's Pramila Patten admits that all her information comes directly from the Israeli regime, and that it blocks UN agencies with an actual investigative mandate from doing independent investigations into their propaganda claims
after claiming in the beginning she will "verify information", even though she has admitted before and it's in her official mandate that she has no investigative powers or abilities, she finally admits on page 20, near the very end, "yeah, we don't have an investigative mandate"
after admitting there's no evidence of rape in the videos and photos handed to them by the Israeli regime, she admits she has to rely solely on "positions of bodies and clothing", which she admits earlier Zaka hoaxers constantly moved around, and "testimonies" by the same hoaxers
and so it begins: Israeli media makes the first shot, before Pramila Patten has even held her press conference, claiming she will present "circumstantial evidence" proving their atrocity propaganda hoax. Now wait for the entire Western media to follow later today
Reuters, following Jerusalem Post, is now doing the first Western media hit, demanding everyone in the media class better pay attention and repeat Pramila Patten's "vindication" of the hoax, and of course just shamelessly doing it via the Israeli regime's demands of it to be done
ahead of today's major Israeli propaganda laundering of the "mass rape" hoax via the UN's Pramila Patten, here's Gettleman, Sella and Schwartz admitting the regime is using her as a proxy, while blocking an actually independent UN agency with investigative authority and powers:
that piece is the follow-up Gettleman, Sella and Schwartz did to "respond to critiques", which they intentionally framed entirely around this UN team headed by Pramila Patten. Why? Because they know she would regurgitate their own hoax back to them:
now here's a huge problem for Gettleman, Sella, Schwartz and the rest of the media class. They falsely claim that Pramila Patten actually will verify information. But that's a lie. They're yet again intentionally lying. As she herself has said: "It's not my role to investigate."