GA Prosecutor's Proposed Testimony Offered to Reopen #FaniWillis Disqualification hearing
From in or around August of 2023 through January of 2024, Ms. Yeager had numerous, in-person and other conversations with attorney Terence Bradley in which information relating to District Attorney Willis and Mr. Wade was discussed""
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
"Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020"
"Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney #FaniWillis tell Mr. Bradley:
“They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
"Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person"
I cannot emphasize enough how significant this is.
The judge will be hard pressed to ignore the proposed testimony of another Georgia prosecutor who is coming forward to correct what she perceives as a fraud perpetrated on the court by Fulton DA #FaniWillis
"District Attorney Willis was calling Mr. Bradley in response to an article that was published about how
much money Mr. Wade and his law partners had been paid in this case. Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney Willis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
This appears to be a reference to this piece from @dcexaminer
Judge in the #YoungThug #YSLTrial orders a "show cause" contempt hearing for everyone who was present for his allegedly illegal secret "ex parte" meeting with #FaniWillis' top prosecutor
He is obsessed with finding the "leak" - which was perfectly legal
And in his order, he confesses to the ex parte
"Judges shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications...made to them outside the presence of the parties, or their lawyers, concerning a pending proceeding"
In my opinion, Glanville should immediately step aside from this case and retire.
I doubt he will like the blowback from all this that will eventually land on him.
He seems to be emotionally invested in everything about this case.
Jocelyn Wade files a new response to Nathan Wade's effort to get out of his support order after he left the #FaniWillis team
Wade alleges that since he was booted from the Trump RICO case by #FaniWillis that he's has a "change in circumstances"
Meaning: "I'm making less money"
Jocelyn says Nathan is lying because she says he got two checks totalling $53,000 only 3 days prior to filing his "emergency" motion to modify his support obligation
Former #FaniWillis “special prosecutor” Nathan Wade facing contempt of court allegations in his pending divorce
“Defendant urgently requires medical procedures, namely an endoscopy, colonoscopy, and ultrasound, due to severe physical symptoms she has been enduring. These symptoms have significantly impacted her ability to consume
most foods, leading to a substantial weight loss”
Despite a direct request from Defendant to Plaintiff for prepayment and an
additional demand from Defendant’s counsel to Plaintiff’s counsel, Plaintiff has
failed and neglected to fulfill his obligation under the Temporary Order to cover
these necessary healthcare costs. Instead, Plaintiff has instructed Defendant to
make payment to the provider herself, with an assurance of reimbursement.
[Exhibit C attached hereto comprises copies of emails exchanged between the
parties and a subsequent email to Plaintiff’s counsel, further elucidating the
aforementioned interactions.]
This is the application filed with the Georgia Court of Appeals asking them to hear the #FaniWillis disqualification appeal.
It will be assigned to a three judge panel. It requires only one judge to agree to allow the appeal to proceed.
While the trial court factually found DA Willis’s out-of-court statements were improper and Defendants proved an apparent conflict of interest, the trial court erred as a matter of law by not requiring dismissal and DA Willis’ disqualification. This legal error requires the Court’s immediate review.
The erroneous failure to disqualify a prosecutor is a structural error that would not just cause substantial error at trial – it would render each and every trial in this case a nullity.
Given the complexity of this case, the fact that it likely will be conducted through multiple different trials given the number of Defendants, and the projected length of each of these trials (estimated by the State to be at least four months each, but likely much longer), the time and resources that the courts, the parties, and the taxpayers of Fulton County are going to be forced to expend to go through this process even once is massive.
It is neither prudent nor efficient to require the courts, the parties, or taxpayers to run the significant and avoidable risk of having to go through this painful, divisive, and expensive process more than once when an existing structural error can be remedied by this Court now.