Parker Merritt (tx/acc) Profile picture
Mar 5 β€’ 21 tweets β€’ 8 min read β€’ Read on X
π—™π—’π—Ÿπ—Ÿπ—’π—ͺπ—œπ—‘π—š π—™π—Ÿπ—’π—ͺ𝗦 𝗩: π—£π—’π—’π—Ÿ 𝗖π—₯𝗒𝗦𝗦-π—£π—’π—Ÿπ—Ÿπ—œπ—‘π—”π—§π—œπ—’π—‘
In today's @coinmetrics State of the Network, we examine on-chain flows b/t mining pools and their counterparties, uncovering hidden links to help assess the true degree of mining decentralization πŸ”


Image
Image
Image
Image
Any proper mining pool analysis starts with the "0-hop" and "1-hop" heuristic.

0-hop addresses (typically pools) are the direct recipients of new BTC issuance, while 1-hop addresses (typically miners) are any address linked to pools by at least 1 outflow. Image
To link 0-hops to pools, we make use of the "coinbase signature." When pools mine blocks, they insert arbitrary data into the $BTC issuance tx. By standard, most include a claim of ownership.

@coinmetrics exposes this via ATLAS's extra_data field, easily mapping blocks to pools. Image
Looking at the flow of issuance & transaction fees to mining pools, there's already troubling signs of centralization.

In 2023, the top 2 pools (Foundry & AntPool) earned the majority of mining rewardsβ€” around 53% between the two. Image
Generally, links b/t 0-hop addresses & pools are mutually exclusive, each controlling an isolated set.

However, some pools exhibit overlap. Examining the 7 0-hops associated w/ Binance Pool & BTC​.com, 2 addresses received payouts from both pools. Image
The overlap is brief, with 22 BTC​.com blocks paying out to Binance Pool addresses in 2023.

Still, any shared flows lend credence to the theory that Binance Pool is white-label BTC​.com, complicating efforts to directly measure pool centralization.
After taking custody in a 0-hop address, pools distribute rewards to their constituent miners.

Still, we can't assume all 1-hop addresses = miners.

Some miners withdraw earnings directly to an exchange, providing optionality to liquidate BTC & cover operating costs.
Binance, Coinbase, & Kraken are top benefactors, receiving 21k BTC. U.S. pools & exchanges have clear alignmentβ€” Foundry made up 89% of pool flows to Coinbase, Kraken, & Gemini.

However, Seychelles-based MEXC initially appears to be shockingly dominant in pool-to-exchange flows. Image
Other sources tie the MEXC addresses to Cobo​.com, a custodian led by F2Pool founder Discus Fish. We’ll call this group the β€œMEXC/Cobo cluster.”

Since Jan. 2023, this cluster received 63.6k BTC via pool payouts. AntPool contributed 45.7k BTCβ€”nearly 47% of their total inflow.
Many pool-to-exchange flows contain inputs from multiple pools.

Based on the β€œcommon input heuristic," this tx structure typically hints a set of addresses shares a common owner.

At the very least, it suggests a high degree of coordination b/t pools moving funds to exchanges.
Since 2023, there were 1,200+ pool-to-exchange flows w/ shared inputs. Contributors include AntPool, Binance Pool, F2Pool, Luxor, BTC​.com, Braiins, & Poolin.

Most also include inputs from MEXC/Cobo, indicating the entities play a hands-on role in consolidating outflows. Image
Looking at the remaining 1-hop addresses, there’s a puzzling amount of transfers from multiple pools to a singular address, 3BH…WGb.

Last year, analysts at @TheMinerMag_ spotted this suspicious consolidation of funds, pinning the blame on AntPool.
theminermag.com/news/2023-12-2…
@TheMinerMag_ On top of +36.3k BTC from AntPool, 3BH…WGb received contributions from 7 of the other top mining pools.

In aggregate, 57.4k BTC flowed from pools to this address, making up around 18% of the 1-hop flow total (excluding exchanges) since Jan. 2023. Image
3BH…WGb doesn’t appear to share inputs with other pools/exchanges, making its ownership difficult to pinpoint via heuristical clustering.

Nonetheless, the consolidation of funds into this address implies the existence of an entity backstopping multiple pool operations.
atlas.coinmetrics.io/address-detail…
@TheMinerMag_ Many pools offer Full Pay Per Share (FPPS), sending miners consistent compensation regardless of whether the pool mines blocks.

While convenient for miners, FPPS introduces liquidity risk, as short-term variance in β€œpool luck” can throw flows off balance.
minebest.com/blog/pps-vs-fp…
Poolin's collapse in 2022 was largely attributed to a FPPS imbalance, with the illiquid pool ultimately suspending withdrawals and triggering an 80% exodus in pool hashrate.
coinmetrics.substack.com/p/state-of-the…
Image
Still, pools have had little choice but to embrace FPPS. In 2022, $RIOT broke off from Braiins, a pool offering Pay Per Last N Shares (PPLNS). After a period of bad luck, on-chain flows show Riot switched to Foundry, the top FPPS pool. A year later, Braiins switched to FPPS.
coinmetrics.substack.com/p/state-of-the…Image
For small pools, absorbing long bouts of bad luck requires a larger, liquid partner. 3BH…WGb appears to be this partner.

3BH…WGb also receives many flows from the MEXC/Cobo cluster. The common thread b/t these entities is Loop, an asset transfer network created by Cobo. Image
Given FPPS challenges, pools likely leverage Loop for payout mgmt. This reduces liquidity risk, but adds counterparty risk, inserting another middleman into mining.

Miners can switch pools, but contributors oversee ~50% of hashrate, leaving few choices for fully opting out.
Pool centralization is a big concern in the Bitcoin community, with Foundry/AntPool dominance elevating censorship & network disruption risk.

Though the remaining hashrate is well-distributed, links b/t pools are a concern, signaling a hidden consolidation of power in mining.
I hope you found this thread insightful, but check out the full @coinmetrics report for a more detailed breakdown of our latest mining flows analysis!

And be sure to subscribeβ€” lots of great mining pieces in the pipeline heading into the halving ⛏️
coinmetrics.substack.com/p/state-of-the…

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Parker Merritt (tx/acc)

Parker Merritt (tx/acc) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ParkerMerritt

Dec 13, 2022
1/ With a turbulent 2022 in the rear view, #Bitcoin miners are on the retreat. After tipping ~265 EH/s last month, hashrate has tumbled -6% πŸ“‰

In response, we saw a massive -7.3% network difficulty adjustment, the largest downtick since the Chinese miner exodus of summer '21. Image
2/ Still, miner margins have been compressed all year, so the burst of hashrate in late Q3 is a bit mysterious.

One theory offered by @Data_Always is that miner rackspace was rapidly reallocated from GPUs to ASICs in the wake of the Ethereum Merge. Image
3/ As explored in the Q3 @coinmetrics mining special, only 25% of Ethereum's hashrate found a home in its estranged sister chain #ETC, giving even more credence to the rackspace reallocation rumors.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(