I've been building a Baby SkyNet. This will be the thread where I'll show its progress:
Here's the theory behind the work: there may be some correlation between how someone looks and their political opinions. This should be self evident since most people make these inferences all the time. The question is whether a machine can learn to do this.
Methodology: train a machine on group photos and events where the political ideology of the people presented is pretty evident so it isn't my opinions of how someone looks impacting the machine. Here are some examples:
Since this is a baby SkyNet meant to detect libs/leftists, the libs/leftists are labeled "Sus" and the Republicans/conservatives/RWers are labeled "Normal"
In theory, the more data the machine is given the better it will be able to make inferences. So for instance, Milo Yiannopoulos wearing pearls being labeled a conservative would be an outlier that would throw the machine off, but such outliers become less important with more data
I hope this makes sense, but the more data the machine is fed the better it will be at noticing patterns and situating outliers. Right now it is just a cute baby trying to understand the world. Here are some examples that I've already performed:
Test: Obama being spotted in New York being greeted by his fans
Test: a tea party event from like a decade ago
Test: a country music fest:
Test: an anti-gun event
Day 4 testing: Trump supporters on the side of the road waving flags
Day 4 testing: sad Hillary voters
Day 5 testing: Trump x YMCA
Day 5 Baby Skynet testing: BLM blocks a highway
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 6
Source: The Official Donald Trump Jam
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 6
Source: A day with Clinton fans
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 7
Source: Trump supporters gather for first night of 'Stop the Steal' demonstrations
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 7 #2
Source: See scenes from Sacramento's Black Lives Matter protest over George Floyd police death
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 7 #3
Source: Seth Meyers not happy about the "alt-right"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 8 #1
Source: Redneck Vocabulary With Alabama Boss
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 8 #2
Source: Rachel Maddow breaks down during report on 'tender age' shelters
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 9 #1
Source: College Democrats make voices heard with UCF campus march
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 9 #2
Source: Climate protesters throw soup on Van Gogh painting
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 10 #1
Source: "North Dakota State Rep Brandon Prichard Spreads Falsehoods in Defense of Christian Nationalism"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 10 #2
Source: "Rick Joyner Says Ancient Israel Was 'The First Republic In History.' It Was Literally A Theocracy"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 10 #3
Source: "RWW News: Donald Trump Promises Christian Nationalists Unprecedented Political Power"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 10 #4
Source: "I Pledge Allegiance To Trump"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 10 #5
Source: "Andrew Torba: Christian Nationalists ARE The Republican Party"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 10 #6
Source: "RWW News: 'Christian Nationalist State Sen. Dusty Deevers Wants To Go Back To The 1600s" with @BonifaceOption @contramordor
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 10 #7
Source: "RWW News: @William_E_Wolfe Says Politicians Must 'Exercise Authority' In Accordance With the Bible"
@William_E_Wolfe Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 11 #1
Source: "RWW News: Far-Right Thrilled With Trump's Increasingly Overt Authoritarianism"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 11 #2
Source: Jason Rapert: "The Antichrist Cult"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 11 #3
Source: "MTG Says Nick Fuentes Is Racist and Very Immature"
Baby SkyNet Testing: Day 11 #4
Source: "Tucker Carlson confirms he is in Russia to interview Vladimir Putin"
𝐀𝐧𝐭𝐢-𝐂𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐬𝐦 is the idea that Cretes are uniquely predisposed to being liars. As defined elsewhere, ethnic sin is either malicious, vainglorious, or separatist, but the anti-Cretism forms of it usually tend toward the malicious.
Streamline productivity by saying NO to anti-Cretism
After being on the losing side of a revolution, the conservative ceases to be a conservative in the proper sense of the word. Instead, he either becomes a counter revolutionary or a collaborator.
The Collaborator does not need to buy entirely into the Revolution. In fact, he rarely does. What the Collaborator does, however, is internalize his defeat and begins accepting the frame of the Revolution while questioning specific aspects of its excesses for a time.
While they are quick to point to their record of asking the Revolutionaries to drive the speed limit, the Conservative who becomes a Collaborator's main function after the Revolution is to police the Conservatives who become Counter Revolutionaries.
The Reformers did not take a "just preach the gospel" approach. They went straight to their national elite and tried to win them over to the Reformation, and what they offered the national elite was something the elite found beneficial vis-à-vis Rome.
Today's church leaders are not in the same position. They have nothing to offer the current crop of national and international elite other than offering to smoothly manage Christianity's decline and ensuring that their people don't resist.
This is where we are.
Now an elite theory approach to this would be to pick out rogue elite and try to win them to our side. We can see some aspects of this in the Christian support of Trump and Musk.
The following thread was taken from The Southern Magazine, 1871. If you feel inclined to read along, check it out here for free: static1.squarespace.com/static/590be12…
For perspective, the LCMS is like 5x larger than the PCA. It is very difficult to have so many people in a body in the negative world, especially for cradle Lutherans, who struggle with being labeled haters. Also, your soft antinomian podcasters didn't prep you for this hour.
To make a more general remark, because the soft antinomian podcaster phenomenon wasn't confined to Lutherans: it sucks that at the very hour that real leaders with foresight should have been preparing people for what's upon us now, we were plagued with a swarm of antinomians
Instead of preparing people for being potentially drummed out of polite society or having to be more cautious about casually mentioning your faith, we had dudes and chicks yelling at everyone for not talking about justification by faith alone 24/7