views
Andrew A. Michta Profile picture
Mar 13 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🧵After several days in #Warsaw, and having just arrived in #Helsinki, one thing is clear: @NATO allies on the Eastern frontier get it when it comes to the nature of Russian threat. They're ready to do what is necessary to return NATO to its collective deterrence/defense role.1/9
The Poles and Finns understand the existential nature of the threat #Russia poses. If anyone should doubt that, ask yourself why #Poland joined @NATO in 1999, and why #Finland abandoned its neutrality to join the alliance after the Russian invasion of #Ukraine. They get it. 2/9
When it comes to understanding the nature of Russian predatory imperialism, #Poland & #Finland get it. Several years ago in Helsinki, a man driving me to the airport told me that there is an old saying: "A Russian is a Russian, even if you fry him in butter-tastes the same." 3/9
Over the past 2 yrs, as I've watched the devastation and murder that #Russia has visited on #Ukraine, I've lost all patience with the sophisticated meanderings of our national security intelligentsia about "end-states," "calibration" etc. when it comes to the war in Ukraine. 4/9
The war in #Ukraine has shown the Ukrainian nation's determination to fight for its sovereignty its very existence, but also has laid bare what the West has become. We live in a world where #Europe with its over half-a-billion people can't face up to #Russia of 140 million. 5/9
We live in a world where #EU's $20 trillion (nominal) GDP can't balance #Russia's 2 trillion. As I said recently to a European colleague (impolitely, I admit): "Europe's dilemma is that being fat is not the same as being strong." It's not about the numbers, GDP or population. 6/9
It's about political will. The Roman empire didn't implode because it had a higher standard of living than the barbarians; it imploded because it had no more willpower to fight, its borders were open, and the barbarians roamed free across the realm ready to attack and pillage.7/9
The democratic West will lose unless it wakes up to the enduring realities of hard power. We don't live in a "rules-based international order." The international system remains anarchic and is based on self-help. There is no substitute for an economy based on manufacturing.8/9
Unless we have an industrial economy that can produce weapons/munitions at speed and scale, and a military with adequate reserves, we will lose. I recall a line from the Cold War: "If you don't feed your army, you will feed somebody else's." It's time for a reality check. 9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew A. Michta

Andrew A. Michta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andrewmichta

Mar 8
🧵As I head to Europe for a series of workshops, first a huge shout out to #Sweden on becoming a member of @NATO. Welcome to the family-your entry is important to rebuilding @NATO's capabilities. But, regrettably, outside the flank, I still don't see the requisite urgency. 1/5
I don't want to revisit the % of GDP on defense argument-yes, meeting or failing to meet 2% is an indicator of political will, or the lack thereof. But what matters is whether @NATO allies actually field real exercised military capabilities to resource the new regional plans. 2/5
The reality is that unless the US doubles its defense budget (no chance of that happening at present), Europe has to provide the bulk of conventional deterrence and defense in @NATO. I emphasize: In NATO, for I consider various ideas to create a "European army" to be fantasy. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Feb 23
🧵We seem to be running out of time when it comes to our intestinal fortitude in the West (if there ever truly was one) to support #Ukraine. Our commentariat is oozing pessimism and pundits seem to try to outdo each other debating end-game scenarios, negotiated deals, etc. 1/7
Let me simply say this: Please stop all the speculation about a "Ukraine settlement" and focus on the only thing that matters today, i.e., helping #Ukraine win on the battlefield. This is war, not some conference where we muse about outcomes. This is about Ukraine's survival.2/7
Bottom line: If the Russian military is not defeated on the battlefield in #Ukraine, there is no "political settlement." Does anyone believe that a victorious and newly self-confident Russia will become (as someone opined to me) a "future interlocutor for Europe and the US"? 3/7
Read 7 tweets
Jan 29
🧵I have noticed that of late the same pundits who used to talk about "American hegemony" seem intent to declare the imminent decline of the United States. At times I sense a sort of Schadenfreude in those pronouncements, enumerating gleefully America's recent missteps. 1/10
To those who seem intent to declare that the United States is going the way of the Habsburg empire of yore, I only say this: Breathe. This is not to say the US doesn't have its problems-I would be the last person to argue that the post-Cold War decades were America's finest. 2/10
But the US is a young republic, barely into its 248th year, and while it is currently deeply polarized when it comes to our politics and culture, it remains a nation-state with unique advantages of geography, natural resources and great entrepreneurial dynamism of its people.3/10
Read 10 tweets
Jan 19
🧵It's reasonable to expect that after Putin’s March reelection, Moscow will prioritize another round of mobilization. I would also expect a Russian summer 2024 offensive to coincide with @NATO's Washington summit. At that point I wouldn't rule out Russia widening the front.1/6
As part of those preparations, Russia continues to attack Ukrainian logistics and #Ukraine's critical infrastructure. In what has become a war of attrition, #Ukraine faces two key vulnerabilities: shortage of weapons and munitions and the constantly growing stress on manpower.2/6
Russia now has roughly four-to-one population advantage. It is critical that the West shifts away from the "as long as it takes" approach to aid, to one that gives Ukraine whatever it needs in terms of weapons/munitions to deal Russia a strategic defeat on the battlefield. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jan 8
🧵About a year ago while attending the @MunSecConf I wrote a comment on twitter that Europe increasingly felt to me like something straight from history books. The comment was picked up by @MKarnitschnig and included here in his @POLITICOEurope piece.1/7 politico.eu/article/munich…
At a risk of over-rationalizing history, I feel we are at a point akin to 1938. Back then, Germany and Japan were aggressive and rapidly arming, while the US was stubbornly isolationist and while leaders in Europe believed that diplomacy would avert war and preserve peace. 2/7
Today, Russia and China are arming at speed and scale, assisted by Iran and N. Korea in their bid to relitigate the post-Cold War settlement. And leaders across the West seem unwilling to accept that the prospect of a general war is real. As in 1938, we are simply unready. 3/7
Read 7 tweets
Dec 31, 2023
🧵To all who follow me here: I wish you a Happy New Year. May 2024 be better than 2023. Most of all, I hope that in 2024 we finally recognize that it's not enough to respond to crises, but that we must shape the world in a way that favors freedom and prosperity. My wishes: 1/7
There are just months before we elect our new President. In this critical election year in the US, we need to stop using the current normative language about "defending the rules-based international order" and shift to a straightforward conversation about national interest. 2/7
in 2024 we need to speak plainly about which theaters remain critical to American security and prosperity, what our alliances should look like, the force posture we need and the resources we must generate to ensure our military can deter and, if need defeat, our adversaries. 3/7
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(