Hi @BBCCasualty, your recent episode will contribute to the discrimination faced by people who are Clinically Vulnerable to Covid.
It concerns a character called Aishling, a lady wearing an FFP2 mask, who had isolated herself for four years.
1/🧵
Episode 4 - 'Trauma'
Aishling's "Covid anxiety" had resulted in her overdosing on anxiety medication and being unable to drive.
To assist this narrative, she was completely healthy and, therefore, clearly portrayed as a bit mad.
2/
By the end of the episode, Aishling is seen pulling off her mask to speak (as if people in masks can't talk) and seemingly finding perspective as she realises the doctor suffered her own, far worse, Covid trauma.
More on this later...
3/
This episode is littered with misconceptions, which will no doubt permeate the thinking of the casual viewing public:
This scene perpetuates the myth that masks significantly limit breathing.
The episode misrepresents and undermines mask wearing generally, which is especially problematic for those at higher risk.
The public already don't support them!
#MaskAbuse is a growing problem.
5/
Vaccines *don't* prevent Covid infections.
The patient is repeatedly reassured by staff that they are "𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥".
This is misleading to viewers. Vaccines reduce the severity of the disease, they do NOT result in sterlising immunity.
6/
The episode minimises legitimate anxieties and health concerns of people at higher risk from Covid by contrasting them unfavorably with other forms of trauma (as experienced by her doctor throughout the episode).
7/
We believe this will contribute to the public's lack of empathy and understanding towards those who have health conditions, or other risk factors, which mean they remain at higher risk from Covid.
8/
Aishling's story ended with her taking a deep breath as she pulled off her mask, and will undoubtably contribute to gaslighting faced by Clinically Vulnerable people trying to access essential care safely. It may also influence medical staff.
#MasksInHealthcare #CleanAir 9/
Casualty has failed to acknowledge any risks posed by Covid, especially from nosocomial infections in healthcare.
Many more people continue to die from Covid than 'flu. (HT @jneill)
~20 million people are Clinically Vulnerable to Covid. We remain at higher risk.
10/
We accept that masking may make others feel uncomfortable (due to their own hang-ups).
As in sexual harrassment, what someone else chooses to wear is nobody else's business.
Personal protective equipment enables people to manage risks - particularly in unsafe environments.
11/
The BBCs minimising of Covid, mask wearing, and general misinformation only serves to increase the stigmatisation of this already marginalised group - who don't share the health privilege of the general population.
Would you target other minorities in this way?
12/
We support everyone's right to wear a mask , if they choose to, and #MasksInHealthcare😷.
🔊 Calling all UK CO₂ monitor owners
AND any helpful UK voters
PLEASE REPOST ♻️ ❤️ and tag others!
🙏 Can you *please* help us at the local elections next Thursday?
- Even if you don't own one, we still need your help!
1/🧵
<Read our new article - next post>
Last year, your evidence helped us change the Electoral Commission guidance for assisting Clinically Vulnerable voters - which has improved safety for everyone.
This year, we NEED YOUR HELP - to audit whether the guidance has worked. 🙏
The UK has not shared data from 2025. But for CV people it is much worse:
2024 JCVI data showed that vaccines reduced hospitalisations for Clinically Vulnerable people by 45%.
They published it!
...then removed millions with health conditions from eligibility!
2/
45% may sound lower.
But if your baseline is 2-12x more likely to be hospitalised from Covid, a 45% reduction in risk prevents 2-12x more hospitalisations per dose.
The JCVI removed high-risk groups on cost-effectiveness grounds.
But the cost-effectiveness case is stronger!
3/
The government just published its Pandemic Preparedness Strategy.
TLDR: Some welcome commitments inc. on ventilation. But Clinically Vulnerable people are still not clearly defined or automatically protected, and the prioritisation framework won't arrive until 2027.
1/🧵
What's new?
Published 25 March 2026, this is the UK's first major pandemic strategy since Covid.
It covers all 4 nations, sets out 12 principles and detailed action plans to 2030, backed by around £1 billion of investment.
But what about the detail...?
2/
They know another pandemic is coming... and epidemics are also a risk.
The question is:
Will Clinically Vulnerable families be protected when it does?
- This document raises the question more than it answers it.
⚠️East Kent Trust failed to report their first case for 2 days⚠️
Here's what you need to know.
TLDR: Peaked 13th March. No new cases since - with reporting delays, but that's even better news than it sounds.
1/🧵 👇 @laurabundock @SkyNews
THE OUTBREAK IS DECLINING but understates how well that's going. 📉
The earliest case became unwell on 9th March, with the latest on 16th March, and the peak was 13th March.
2/
Cases take time to be confirmed and reported.
The fact that nothing new has surfaced in the data as of 23rd March - despite the reporting lag - means the real-world situation is almost certainly better than the numbers show.
Meningitis
* Important thread for those who prefer balanced and factual information *
In order to understand risk we need to break down a few things....
🦠Risk from the bacteria
💙💜💗 Individual risk
🎓 Environmental risks 1/
The Kent outbreak is predominantly MenB (Group B). This is a serious infection - and potentially an adapted strain - investigations are ongoing...
Bacterial meningitis is rare but more severe than viral, and up to 1 in 10 cases of bacterial meningitis in the UK is fatal.
2/
MenB isn't new. There are around 300 cases of MenB per year in the UK, even with vaccination programmes.
What's unusual is the cluster - multiple cases linked to a single location in a short window. It has now spread to a student at a second university in Canterbury, Kent. 3/
UK COVID INQUIRY - CVF💙💜💗
@AdamWagner1 Closing Submissions
The Covid Inquiry has good ventilation protocols (as advised by CVF at the start of the Inquiry) including HEPA filters.
Under 1000ppm is therefore the safe threshold ( but without it would be under 800ppm).
1/
We need to understand airborne transmission in order to make all indoor environments safer for everyone, and especially for Clinically Vulnerable people.
2/
The need for Clinically Vulnerable people to have: