Hi @BBCCasualty, your recent episode will contribute to the discrimination faced by people who are Clinically Vulnerable to Covid.
It concerns a character called Aishling, a lady wearing an FFP2 mask, who had isolated herself for four years.
1/🧵
Episode 4 - 'Trauma'
Aishling's "Covid anxiety" had resulted in her overdosing on anxiety medication and being unable to drive.
To assist this narrative, she was completely healthy and, therefore, clearly portrayed as a bit mad.
2/
By the end of the episode, Aishling is seen pulling off her mask to speak (as if people in masks can't talk) and seemingly finding perspective as she realises the doctor suffered her own, far worse, Covid trauma.
More on this later...
3/
This episode is littered with misconceptions, which will no doubt permeate the thinking of the casual viewing public:
This scene perpetuates the myth that masks significantly limit breathing.
The episode misrepresents and undermines mask wearing generally, which is especially problematic for those at higher risk.
The public already don't support them!
#MaskAbuse is a growing problem.
5/
Vaccines *don't* prevent Covid infections.
The patient is repeatedly reassured by staff that they are "𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥".
This is misleading to viewers. Vaccines reduce the severity of the disease, they do NOT result in sterlising immunity.
6/
The episode minimises legitimate anxieties and health concerns of people at higher risk from Covid by contrasting them unfavorably with other forms of trauma (as experienced by her doctor throughout the episode).
7/
We believe this will contribute to the public's lack of empathy and understanding towards those who have health conditions, or other risk factors, which mean they remain at higher risk from Covid.
8/
Aishling's story ended with her taking a deep breath as she pulled off her mask, and will undoubtably contribute to gaslighting faced by Clinically Vulnerable people trying to access essential care safely. It may also influence medical staff.
#MasksInHealthcare #CleanAir 9/
Casualty has failed to acknowledge any risks posed by Covid, especially from nosocomial infections in healthcare.
Many more people continue to die from Covid than 'flu. (HT @jneill)
~20 million people are Clinically Vulnerable to Covid. We remain at higher risk.
10/
We accept that masking may make others feel uncomfortable (due to their own hang-ups).
As in sexual harrassment, what someone else chooses to wear is nobody else's business.
Personal protective equipment enables people to manage risks - particularly in unsafe environments.
11/
The BBCs minimising of Covid, mask wearing, and general misinformation only serves to increase the stigmatisation of this already marginalised group - who don't share the health privilege of the general population.
Would you target other minorities in this way?
12/
We support everyone's right to wear a mask , if they choose to, and #MasksInHealthcare😷.
Lee-Anne, who has a Clinically Vulnerable family, has just spoken to @carolvorders about her experience - as her child was off-rolled (which is an illegal practice) rather than offering him a safe learning environment.
This is discrimination - education is a human right.
1/
She, and others like her, have saved the government money. She has to take the financial burden of educating her child.
@carolvorders noted parents and medics are asking for #CleanAir💨.
We are!!!
When we upgrade buildings for RAAC we MUST be improving ventilation. 2/
Most people don't know @carolvorders that the British Council of Offices (in line with new European and US standards since the emergence of Covid) has issued higher standards for ventilation since the pandemic.
⚠️ Covid vaccine access likely to reduce from Autumn 2024 ⚠️
𝗧𝗟𝗗𝗥 : Potentially bad news for "such groups as 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗿𝘀 and 𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗱𝘂𝗮𝗹𝘀.
Today's statement from the JCVI is jaw dropping.
What starts off as a seemingly innocuous announcement of the usual spring vaccine groups who are eligible for spring boosters veers off at the end with some bombshells.
Vaccines will, unsurprisingly, include the stocks of XBB: Pfizer & Moderna
1. Social Responsibility (1.3)
The adverts are socially irresponsible, suggesting children with symptoms of illness, such as a runny nose or stomach ache (which may be symptoms of Covid or other serious conditions), should still attend school.
This could potentially encourage behaviour that increases the risk of spreading infections - which poses a public health risk to other families and the wider community.
As we head into 2024, we all need to step up to actively challenge this more. Whether that is a news report, government advertising, or social media.
This year, we had "Summer flu".
Now we have "Festive flu" (only some of which is actually 'flu)
1/
We wouldn't recommend dipping into these posts unprepared. It is often hard enough often to manage your own family and friends...
But you will see everything from the conspiracy theorists:
2/
People who aren't testing with symptoms. Then, after one test, they are reassured (as we know the free ones are out of date and inaccurate) that it is conclusive proof.
🚨WARNING :
Old bivalent vaccines were given to the MOST vulnerable population when a summer surge triggered an early start to the autumn vaccine campaign, before the newer XBB vaccines were available.
However, a new study has found that these older bivalent vaccines are ineffective against the JN.1 variant, currently circulating at a high rate globally. This is now resulting in the preventable hospitalisation of thousands of vulnerable people.
We also know there is a huge surplus of newer XBB vaccines, which are earmarked disposal. Partly due to the substitution for the older ineffective vaccines earlier in the season.