views
🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Mar 15 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Truly outrageous.

Peter Navarro was the White House trade director to the President of the United States.

We’ve had constitutional executive privilege for 250 years, going back to George Washington.

So Presidents can get candid advice from their aides without fear they will get hauled before Congress—and especially not get thrown in prison.

The destruction of constitutional executive privilege—by Biden, his Justice Department, House Democrats, and these hyper-partisan 4 DC Democrat judges—to get Trump is short-sighted and highly destructive to the presidency.

Especially as they ignore Biden’s blatant foreign corruption and Hunter’s own blatant contempt of Congress.

Truly shameful.

Hope Biden (and Obama) White House officials understand they are now fair targets under a Trump 47 Justice Department.

Below are pictures of the 4 hyper-partisan DC Obama judges who are destroying the presidency--and the legitimacy of the federal judiciary.

Left to Right:
1. Amit Priyavadan Mehta, DC District Judge
2. Robert Leon Wilkins, DC Circuit Judge
3. Cornelia (Nina) Pillard, DC Circuit Judge
4. Patricia Ann Millett, DC Circuit JudgeImage
Image
Here is my prior 🧵 on my outrage at the DC federal courts:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mrddmia

Feb 28
Federal judges must release January 6th protesters wrongfully convicted under the Biden DOJ’s politicized, bogus use of a federal criminal statute never intended to get weaponized against political opponents.

Trump 47 DOJ must hold accountable responsible Biden DOJ officials.
And every federal judge—partisan Democrat and cowardly Republican—who went along this:

You are a disgrace.

To the Constitution.

You ruined the lives of so many families.

You do not have the judgment to serve.

You should resign.

But you will not.

Because you are a disgrace.
We must make major reforms to the federal courts in DC.

The DC federal judges are largely political operatives in robes.

From both parties.

The uniparty.

Their response to January 6th proved this.

DC federal judges have too much power.

Yet they lack sound judgment.

Awful.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 6
Today's decision by the Democrat-controlled DC Circuit Court of Appeals is as predictable as it is wrong.

Members of Congress are immune, both civilly and criminally, for their officials acts.

So are federal judges.

Why wouldn't the President of the United States--any President?

Four DC federal judges did not even establish at a baseline level that the President of the United States cannot be thrown in prison by his successor based upon his official acts.

They ignored the Constitution's separation of powers.

Thus, the Supreme Court must take and decide this case.

This case is much bigger than Trump.

This precedent is very dangerous and highly destructive to the presidency--thus, our Constitution and country.

This means the Trump 47 Justice Department can prosecute Obama--along with his aides like U.S. Circuit Judge David Barron, Obama's legal advisor at the time--for capital murder for their extrajudicial drone-striking of American citizens (including a minor).

This also means the Trump 47 Justice Department can prosecute Biden for his illegal release of dangerous migrants into the United States and the natural and probable crimes they commit.

Will the Supreme Court do its job?

Or allow these Republic-ending tactics?

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
The DC Circuit creates a special rule for Trump.

(So they can ignore their ruling to protect Obama and Biden.)

If the Supreme Court wants the federal judiciary to keep any legitimacy with half of the American people, it must do its job and fix this dangerously wrong ruling. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 16
Dear @JoyAnnReid:

Iowa has always been a leader on civil rights.

We’ve always been a free state.

The Iowa Supreme Court protected out-of-state slaves in 1839.

We desegregated our schools in 1868.

And allowed Black men to vote that same year.

We allowed women to vote in 1920.

And we’ve been a refugee resettlement state for 50 years.

Iowa is a very welcoming place.

For you to pretend Iowa is a racist state proves you’re shamefully and disgustingly dishonest with your viewers.

But your anti-white, anti-Christian bigotry makes your deranged leftwing @MSNBC viewers very happy.
Let me be more blunt:

@JoyAnnReid doesn’t care if poor Black kids are trapped in failed government schools.

She doesn’t care about rampant Black-on-Black murders and other violent crime.

She just wants to make a bunch of money off of deranged white liberals who watch @MSNBC.
Her father came from the Congo.

Her mother came from Guyana.

Guess where they met?

The University of Iowa.

In the “racist” state that provided two African immigrants with their graduate degrees.

So @JoyAnnReid is an elite Black woman, born into privilege provided by Iowans.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 6, 2023
ICYMI from @joshgerstein in @Politico on November 13, 2021:

FBI raid on Project Veritas founder’s home sparks questions about press freedom

politi.co/3FesP3G
"The Biden administration’s effort to establish itself as a committed champion of press freedom is facing new doubts because of the Justice Department’s aggressive legal tactics against a conservative provocateur known for his hidden-camera video stings."

politico.com/news/2021/11/1…
"A predawn FBI raid last weekend against Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe and similar raids on some of his associates are prompting alarm from some First Amendment advocates, who contend that prosecutors appear to have run roughshod over Justice Department media policies and a federal law protecting journalists."

Read 7 tweets
Dec 6, 2023
ICYMI from @JamesRosenTV in @NYTimes on December 30, 2016:

"Over the past eight years, the [Obama] administration has prosecuted nine cases involving whistle-blowers and leakers, compared with only three by all previous administrations combined."

nytimes.com/2016/12/30/opi…
The Obama Administration "has repeatedly used the Espionage Act, a relic of World War I-era red-baiting, not to prosecute spies but to go after government officials who talked to journalists."

nytimes.com/2016/12/30/opi…
"Under Mr. Obama, the Justice Department and the F.B.I. have spied on reporters by monitoring their phone records, labeled one journalist an unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal case for simply doing reporting and issued subpoenas to other reporters to try to force them to reveal their sources and testify in criminal cases."

Read 9 tweets
Nov 29, 2023
Amen.

Advertiser boycotts are highly effective tactics leftists use to cow media executives to destroy free speech--and control the political narrative.

@MMFA is the driving force behind conservative media getting crushed--and conservative voices silenced.

Cheers to @ElonMusk.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(