I’ve seen a lot of surprise on here regarding Judge Cannon ruling against Trump’s motion to dismiss. For those saying that she did the “right thing,” I have some bad news for you. (Thread)
#ResistanceUnited
#DemVoice1
First, this was a simple legal issue with an easy answer—one that did not require hearings. The Espionage Act is neither new nor unconstitutionally vague. The motions were frivolous, and the legal answer didn’t require anything more than briefs. This was an unnecessary delay.
Second, as @AWeissmann_ and @neal_katyal noted with @Lawrence tonight, she denied the motion “without prejudice”—meaning Trump’s lawyers can raise the argument later. And the order doesn’t even cover the Presidential Records Act, so that is still out there.
Now, if Cannon has ruled in Trump’s favor and dismissed the case, it would have gone right to the 11th Circuit. Based on what we’ve seen when she’s been overruled before, they would have been quick and decisive—much more so than this denial for now.
So rather than give a firm ruling on a clear issue, Cannon’s quasi-denial amounts to a delay that opens the door to more delay later. Every bit of it inures to Trump’s benefit by keeping decisions out of the hands of more serious judges.
Judge Cannon is not stupid. I don’t believe her rulings and delays are the results of incompetence. I can’t know whether this is the result of a carrot (a SCOTUS seat) or a stick (blackmail), but I’m certain it is intentional. And it’s nefarious.
I’m just as certain that (1) this is legally the easiest case against Trump, and (2) there is no way it will be resolved before the election. Jack Smith and his team are talented and tenacious, but they will not save us from ourselves in 2024. It’s on us.
All the facts are out there. Trump took documents to which he wasn’t entitled, lied about them, and intentionally prevented their return. He very likely has traded or sold national military plans and secrets. And his primary defense is that he is allowed to do so.
As citizens and voters, our job is to decide whether we are okay with a president who acts so cavalierly to endanger our national security and the safety of our military members. It should not require a timely guilty verdict to say we are not.
Trump and virtually every Republican in Congress want him not only to get away with this, but to be in position to do more damage. Until the GOP is something other than cravenly loyal to Trump, we must keep them out of power. This election is crucial. #VoteBlue
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When you look at today’s GOP orthodoxy, “the cruelty is the point” seems to fit—but there is a larger scope than that. Much of what they try to do is about controlling most American citizens for the economic use of the powerful few. (Thread)
#ResistanceUnited
#DemVoice1
And while we fret (rightfully) about this on the Project 2025 national scale, right-wing actors in state governments have already implemented significant steps here. And they are continuing to roll in. It’s a cradle-to-grave approach for using the working American.
The attacks on reproductive rights start the process. The notion of abortion costing the economy “able-bodied workers” is part of the justification for strict anti-abortion laws. The individual rights and needs of women? Not their concern.
I actually agree with the result in the Colorado Trump ballot listing case. But rather than just deciding the clear case before it, the majority took this into territory that still managed to get it wrong. (Thread)
#ResistanceUnited
#DemVoice1
Initially: yes, the decision was 9-0 (a per curiam opinion) for the result. If you read all the opinions, though, the fault lines in the Court remain sobering. And as tends to be the case these days, I align with the minority.
The reason I agree: individual state findings for a national election can cross the line and affect other states. Why is this a problem? For starters, part of recent MAGA strategy has been to push Secretary of State candidates willing to overturn voting results.
Read a response here that I feel is worth exploring—not because I particularly care what this stranger to my family thinks of my parenting style, but rather because the idea isn’t one limited to trolls and cultists. (Thread)
#ResistancePride
#DemVoice1
First, let’s dispense with the idea that parents of trans kids are trying to make the kid something we want them to be. Parents want all kinds of things for our kids: for them to grow up healthy and strong, for them to know themselves, for them to find their way into the world.
Some parents undoubtedly push their kids in particular directions, whether into sports, religion, particular career paths, etc. I have never known the parent of a trans kid to have pushed their kid toward a gender identity. It’s simply not a thing.
Our allies understand what is at stake here: a despot seeking more power and more control. The last time the U.S. decided to stay out of things in Europe, the cost was enormous. (Thread)
#ResistanceRoots
#DemVoice1
The interest in isolationism isn’t new at all. In WWII, the U.S. sat out for a long time, remaining officially neutral as Germany and Japan moved toward domination in Europe and Asia. Ultimately, this created chaos, bloodshed, and more to overcome.
More recent history also suggests this isn’t an isolated problem. Russia has in recent years moved to annex Belarus and, initially incrementally but now fully, Ukraine. The notion that he may move to more of Europe isn’t hypothetical.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, was formed in 1949. The purpose was to protect the U.S. and several Western European allies against aggression from the Soviet Union. (Thread)
#ResistanceRoots
#DemVoice1
The negotiations for NATO came on the heels of World War II, with the need for military alliances fresh on the minds of leaders throughout the world. Soviet aggression in 1947-48 was particularly concerning since the USSR had veto power in the UN Security Council.
In this time, while nations were of course concerned with their individual domestic concerns, they recognized the danger of isolationism and the value of working together to defend against international threats.
Much work lies ahead. But when people look back ten years from now on why the Republican Party ultimately imploded, today will be a significant part of the story. (Thread)
#ResistanceUnited
#DemVoice1
The headliner today is the DC Court of Appeals. In that Court’s opinion, the absurd, meritless presidential total immunity argument died. Its corpse will keep twitching until the Supreme Court gets the appeal, but it’s dead.
The Mayorkas impeachment vote failed, as it should have done. Even if you accept that Mayorkas has done a poor job, that should never be the basis for an impeachment. That so many republicans pushed it shows it is a broken party—and the cracks are becoming more visible.