Summary: Willis may have had a net financial benefit from hiring Wade, but it was small. Her repeated efforts to bring the case to trial quickly suggest no improper motive to delay. Thus, despite a "tremendous lapse in judgment" and "unprofessional" demeanor, no actual conflict.
But, there is an appearance of impropriety, because there is evidence of financial benefit and romantic relationship with a subordinate.
Judge strongly suggests that the Fulton County District Attorney's Office was dishonest about when the relationship began. "Odor of mendacity"
The standard on Willis' comments is very vague in Georgia, but the judge clearly does not approve of Willis' "unorthodox decision" to talk to the authors of a book about her case as it was proceeding, nor her speech claiming that criticism was racist.
I like this concluding paragraph a lot. The trial should appear fair to someone without partisan blinders on.
That's a reasonable ask!
Fani Willis get either DQ her whole office and let someone with better judgment take over or her Wade can withdraw.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you chase someone with your car, that is aggravated assault. And you cannot be justified doing something once you commit a felony. You can't shoot an armed homeowner, for instance, if he tries to stop you from burglarizing his house.
Now let's say it turns out that the armed homeowner is a murderer.
That shit isn't relevant, because no set of facts about his past make it ok to break into his house and shoot him.
The first thing to note about Trump's WSJ lawsuit is that he filed it federally in Florida.
In almost every jurisdiction, filing a lawsuit federally helps you avoid the anti-SLAPP statute.
But not in Florida.
So, for instance, when Dan Bongino filed a lawsuit against the Daily Beast for saying he was fired, the Daily Beast filed an anti-SLAPP motion, even though it was in federal court.
And prevailed, because the suit was without merit.