Thread by @vedicpath1

🧵
Let's start

Allegation on Mantra 1:- {Rig-Veda 8/19/36}

Here is the word to translation in English and Hindi.
As you can see this mantra has nothing to do with the allegation.

https://x.com/vedicpath1/status/1764676632596607238?s=20

Allegation on Mantra 2:- {Rig-Veda 8/56/3}

Here is the word to translation in English and Hindi.
As you can see this mantra has nothing to do with the allegation.

https://x.com/vedicpath1/status/1751282349265084694?s=20

Allegation on Mantra 3:- {Rig-Veda 6/27/8}

Here is the word to translation in English and Hindi.
As you can see this mantra has nothing to do with the allegation.

https://x.com/vedicpath1/status/1768629652732702721?s=20

Allegation on Mantra 3:- {Rig-Veda 1/126/3}

This mantra of Rig-Veda do says to give women to the commander (Senapati).
But not for inhuman activity. It is for making Army of females. As this mantra of Yajur-Veda says says the commander to make female Army

https://x.com/vedicpath1/status/1768594634098536497?s=20

Hence this mantra also has nothing to do with the allegation.

Here is the word to translation in English and Hindi of Rig-Veda 1/126/3

https://x.com/vedicpath1/status/1768594640272523344?s=20

Enjoying any living being as possession is against Veda


Hence other interpretation which shows S*x Sl/\very in Veda are wrong because contradictory interpretations of Veda is against Vedic principles.
Also one of the famous Pauranik Acharya agrees with it archive.ph/MsNhM

@threadreaderapp unroll