So excited to announce that my chapter examining the politics of "letting COVID rip" in Australia has been published in the Research Handbook on Public Management and COVID-19!
If you liked my #COVIDHegemony pieces in the Canberra Times/Croakey, then you'll love this! 👇
First of all, hats off to editors @drhdickinson, @DrSophieYates, @JanineOFlynn and @educ84equity 🥳
It's a truly fantastic and important handbook!
While my COVID Hegemony op-eds were based on the second half of this chapter (and examined COVID under the Albo govt in 2022), the first half actually explores the Morrison govt's handling of the pandemic.
Specifically his "let it rip" approach.
In the first half of the chapter, I argue that "the decision to “let it rip” is ideological, informed by three key pillars of thought: neoliberalism, prosperity gospel and social Darwinism."
Let's look at these three categories in more depth.
Neoliberalism:
Neoliberalism is an economic, political, and moral approach prioritising free market capitalism, rugged individualism, and profit over people's well-being and public services.
Under neoliberalism, "inequality is rationalised as a natural reflection of the rich being rewarded for their “merit” while the poor are to blame for their own failures. In times of crisis, profits must be saved over lives."
As I argued, "the 'can-do-capitalist' rhetoric adopted by Morrison in response to the Omicron variant aligns with this neoliberal ethos." He prioritised the economy over health, a market-led approach, and "personal responsibility" over collective systemic response.
Prosperity Gospel:
I argue that "Morrison is also heavily influenced by his Pentecostal faith" and his "'if you have a go, you get a go' mentality sits firmly within a core Pentecostal doctrine – 'prosperity gospel'."
What is prosperity gospel? "Prosperity gospel holds that believers can ensure material fortune, good health, and success through their faith alone."
It "creates a binary of the “worthy” and “unworthy” and alleges "that fortune is contingent on personal actions, emphasising individual agency, self-reliance, and determination."
Basically, it's your own fault that you're sick and poor (while the rich and healthy deserve it).
So "the mantra of “personal responsibility” that Morrison adopted during the Omicron wave is a clear demonstration of prosperity gospel ... Only those who “had a go” would “get a go” while the rest were entirely to blame for their own misfortune."
And lastly, Social Darwinism:
Social Darwinism "not only provides a natural justification for social hierarchies but holds that 'tampering with them weakens humankind'".
Social Darwinism creates a binary "between the “fit” and “unfit” deriving from pre-existing biases" and has often been used to "justify systemic social inequalities and reject attempts to even the playing field".
So "Morrison’s commitment to 'staring down' the virus while acknowledging that many will die, and many more will be infected, repackaged this ideology."
Calling for a "return to normal" during the height of the Omicron wave "insinuates a hierarchy of worth".
I write that, "for Morrison, the future is 'living with COVID' despite the risks that this poses to the most vulnerable Australians, implying that some groups – older, disabled, immunocompromised – must be sacrificed for the 'good of the herd'."
I also theorise that neoliberalism, prosperity gospel and social Darwinism can be regarded as 3 aspects of the same ideology.
They "share a belief in hierarchies of worth, that competition is at the heart of society, and success or failure rests with individual responsibility."
That is, "social Darwinism is the overarching ideology from which neoliberalism and prosperity theology draw inspiration; neoliberalism is the economic manifestation of this theory; and prosperity gospel is the theological paradigm."
The second half of my chapter, as mentioned above, explores me COVID Hegemony theory in explaining the apparent acceptance of “living with COVID” by the Australian people.
But I've covered that extensively here before, e.g.:
I'm so happy to see this piece finally published though! I spent all of 2022 thinking about these ideas and theorising why Australians were suddenly so ok with going from zero-COVID to COVID being everywhere all the time.
But I didn't think about writing or publishing anything because I felt a tad bit of imposter syndrome ("I do genderpol, what would I know?").
Thankfully @drhdickinson asked me to contribute a chapter to this handbook and I was able to put pen to paper!
My piece covering the Clean Air Forum is finally out in The Saturday Paper!
I explore how clean indoor air has been an issue long before the pandemic, which "cost Australia more than $12 billion a year due to ill health and lost productivity."
CMO Paul Kelly set the forum a challenge, and it was taken up by "experts in fields ranging from medicine to architecture, engineering and occupational health and safety [who] gathered with politicians at Parliament House."
The media, policymakers and experts - what Gramsci referred to as the "organs of public opinion" - will "help" us get to this wonderful (eugenicist) reality by creating a "frame shift" and "behaviour changes" 🙃🙃🙃🙃
My latest in The Canberra Times, in which I theorise "COVID Hegemony" to explain the transformation of our pandemic outlook:
"Living with COVID has now become hegemonic, in Gramsci's terms, not just in Australia but in many countries around the world." canberratimes.com.au/story/8039208/…
What is "hegemony"? I draw from Gramsci, who "proposed that those who hold power could ensure that their preferred worldview would be seen as natural, inevitable and beneficial to all by creating and maintaining what he termed cultural hegemony."
#CovidIsNotOver
Those with power achieve hegemony "not by force, but by coercive persuasion. That is, by gaining popular acceptance, even approval of their moral and political values."
A quick 🧵about Morrison's callous and ableist "blessed" comment.
First of all, I'm not shocked at all by his comment, mostly because of his actions in recent years. But also because of his beliefs, clearly demonstrated during the pandemic.
At the start of the year, I wrote about how Morrison's pentecostal faith and neoliberal ideology was disastrous for Australia's COVID-19 response. I concluded that it "caused further harm while deflecting responsibility away from government." canberratimes.com.au/story/7600746/…
Neoliberal ideology argues for the deterioration of public services, such as healthcare, and a devotion to the private market, especially to deal with issues (if you can personally pay for it). Unsurprisingly, neoliberalism devalues and disadvantages disabled people.
There has been a lot of talk that what's happening in Parliament wouldn't be accepted at any other workplace - yet sexual harassment and assault is sadly relatively common in workplaces around Australia.
A recent survey found that 2 in 5 women have reported experiencing workplace sexual harassment in the last 5 years. abc.net.au/news/2021-03-0…
And the responses to those who've reported their experiences have been woeful. 19% were labelled as a troublemaker, 18% were ostracised, victimised or ignored by colleagues and 17% resigned.