Kari Lake‘s case against machines in 2024 was dismissed by a federal court in Arizona on the grounds that it was “too speculative“. Ninth circuit upheld that absurd decision on appeal.
Last week Kari Lake/Kurt Olsen filed at SCOTUS an appeal.
Last NIGHT they filed the appendix with stunning new evidence. (found in the links below).
Here are some key points:
1. Maricopa County’s election software used in the 2020 and 2022 elections has been altered with respect to the machine behavior settings that govern how ballots are read and tabulated.
2. The EAC never approved this altered software, and Maricopa’s many previous representations that this election software is EAC certified, including to the AZ Senate, are false.
3. Knowingly modifying election software without approval or certification pursuant to 16-442 is a felony under AZ law. See 16–1004(B).
4. Dominion’s operative contract with Maricopa states “Data generated by the Democracy Suite Platform, including results reporting, is protected by the deployment of FIPS approved symmetric AES encryption.”
5. But, Dominion placed the master cryptographic keys in plain text and unprotected on the election database except for Windows-login, which are easily bypassed. Leaving these highly sensitive cryptographic keys in this state violates all cyber security protocols and allows a malicious actor to take control of the machine and change results without detection.
6. As Mr. Cotton stated in his declaration “It is like a bank having the most secure vault in the world, touting how secure it is to the public and then taping the combination in large font type on the wall next to the vault door.”
7. Given all of these findings, none of these machines can be trusted to give reliable results in 2024.
This motion for expedited hearing at SCOTUS was filed last night.
Revisionists now say, “Nobody was ‘forced’ to take a jab!”
Nuremberg Code, Baby:
1) The… consent of the… subject is … essential… the person… should …exercise… choice, without … force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion;
1) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent;
should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion;
ISRAEL WAS HACKED!
(Explanation from a close hacker friend of mine: as yet unreported, please distribute widely.)
I should have known something big was about to go down. I wasn’t paying close enough attention but the dates matter. Most of these groups are pro Palestime.
3/26/23 - AnonGhost compromised the Israeli Gov and established the backdoor for remote access.
8/21/23 - Iron Dome was compromised by AnonGhost
8/28/23 - The announcement for the creation of the Five Families
The Group is lead by 5 people who are the leaders of:
…that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion;
…. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.”