Ukraine and Russia trade massive missile attacks. This might appear related to Moscow attack, but it is not.
I am in Kyiv and have just woken up (5am) by two loud explosions
Earlier tonight Ukraine successfully hit Sevastopol with multiple missiles 1/
The Ukrainian attack on Sevastopol that hosts the Russian Black Sea fleet has been confirmed by Russian state media. There are dead and injured.
Ukrainian media report that UK made storm shadows hit a communication center of the Russia fleet 2/
This night Russia launched multiple missiles across the entire Ukraine. It is too early for videos of the damage, but explosions and interceptions are reported across the country. The attack continues
Russia used 14 strategic bombers at once, 2 warships, and drones 3/
At the moment, Russian missiles are in the air in these regions: Lviv, Chernihiv, Cheraksy, Kyiv, Khmelnytsky, Vinnytsya, Volyn,Ternopil, Rivne 4/
A moment ago, Ukrainian media reported another successful attack on Crimea. This time not in Sevastopol, but Hvardiyske 5/
This is why these exchanges are unlikely to be related to the Moscow terror attack
1. It takes considerable time to prepare attacks at this scale.
For example, Russian missiles are code to maneuver through areas without Ukrainian air defense or evade it when impossible 6/
They are also coordinated to hit cities at once. The missiles change directions multiple times, travel in very convoluted patterns, and stay in the air for a long time - sometimes over an hour.
Designing, coordinating, and coding these missions is hard and takes time 7/
The same is true for Ukrainian attacks on Crimea. Ukrainian attacks are much more focused and much smaller in scale and numbers of missiles.
To be successful Ukraine compensates by better preparation, intelligence, mission design and execution 8/
2. These exchanges have been ongoing and had escalated before the terror attack in Moscow
Ukraine and Kyiv in particular have been bombed intensively for the last several days, starting two days before the attack in Moscow 9/
Russian attacks before the Moscow terror have been massive and plunged Ukraine, especially the East into a blackout. They also hit the largest (remaining) hydro dam in Ukraine. The blackout is ongoing 10/
In turn, Ukraine has been busy taking apart Russian oil refineries.
These attacks have been successful to the extent that there are reports the U.S. had asked Ukraine to stop these attacks afraid of escalation by Russia. 11/ politico.eu/article/report…
Ukraine denies there had been a request. But even if it were, Ukraine has defied it and continued to target Russian oil infrastructure. The latest attack was yesterday 12/ independent.co.uk/news/world/eur…
Indirectly, this is evidence that Ukraine is not behind the terror attack in Moscow.
Ukraine carries out operations in Russia, including Moscow.
13/
Media report two types of operations:
1. Targeted assassinations of military, defectors, Russian installed politicians in occupation
2. Targeted attacks on military and defense production infrastructure
Ukraine does not and have never carried out terrorist attacks 14/
But as I wrote yesterday, Putin might not have a choice but to blame Ukraine for the terrorist attack in Moscow 15/
So, the Russian info operations have been busy arguing Ukraine connection
One argument is that the terrorist were traveling to Ukraine. Why on earth would you do that? If anything, you are guaranteed to be captured or killed by Russian troops before you get to the contact line/
Also, the city in which the suspects were arrested is closer (and faster) to Belarus than Ukraine. Plus the border control is a bit easier (sarcasm) in Belarus than at the front line between Russia and Ukraine 18/
But as I wrote yesterday, it might be difficult to ignore the evidence. For example, the fact that ISIS has access to video from the terrorist cameras, while Russian security doesn’t (yet) 20/
However, many people, even in the West, don’t need evidence. They are certain that it looks “increasingly likely” Ukraine is behind the attack on Moscow. 21/
There is also disinformation and amplification of disinformation.
An account post “evidence” that one of the suspects had served in Ukrainian military and is a Ukrainian citizen
No matter that all other suspects are Russian citizens and Tajiks - that doesn’t matter 22/
The report gets amplified only to be refuted later. The name of the suspect may be different, he isn’t Ukrainian, and hasn’t served in Ukraine armed forces.
But the original post pushing this disinformation gets 10s of m views, while it’s refutation - 2.7 m views
Multiple explosions in Kyiv. No air warning before explosions. Traces of air defense missiles in the sky. Telegram channels say Russia launched ballistic missiles.
This is unusual as ballistic missile attacks happen at night or early morning.
Ukrainian media say these were supersonic ballistic missiles launched in Crimea
Here is how things are at our university during the attack 3/
Four suspects in Moscow terror attack are all citizens of Tajikistan: Mirzoyev, 32, Rachabalizoda, 30, Faizov, 19, and Fariduni, 25. There is no evidence connecting them to Ukraine.
They appeared in court visibly tortured. 1/
Faizov was non-responsive in a wheelchair
Mirzoyev had a plastic bag over his neck
Rachabalizoda was without ear; there were videos of Russian Secuirty forces cutting off his ear and forcing him to eat it to him during the arrest 2/
Russian authorities leak multiple photos and videos of torture and barbaric treatment of suspects.
The top Russian propagandist Margarita Simonyan: I when I see them walked bent over to court, and even this [cut off] ear this, I feel exceptionally satisfied. 3/
Many argue that Russian FSB organized the terror attack in Moscow
I think they are wrong and this is why: the U.S. “duty to warn” policy
The U.S. indeed warned Russia about the attack. It can embarrass Russia by releasing the details of its warning. 1/
This threat serves as a constraint on how much Russia can spin the situation.
If Russia pushes Ukraine story too far, the U.S. can release specific facts it gave to Russia. If these facts could have helped avoid the massacre, Russian people can turn against Putin and FSB 2/
Furthermore, Russia might not know everything the U.S. knows. That might be an additional force that limits Russia desire to abuse the horrible attack for its political interest. 3/
Margarita Simonyan: “it is no ISIS, they are all Ukrainians”.
What doesn’t it mean for Russia, Ukraine and the region? 1/
As I said earlier, Putin has no choice but to blame Ukraine. Otherwise he admits his incompetence to prevent the attack, weakness to be unable to respond, and a strategic failure of invading Ukraine instead of focusing on other, real issues for Russia. He will loose power. 2/
Putin might not have a choice but to blame Ukraine for the terrorist attack in Moscow. He might not be successful, though, because the facts point to Islamic radicals.
This is why:
1. The Russian law enforcement’ve shown suspects 1/
They claim one of them is from Tajikistan. None of them are Ukrainians or have lived in Ukraine
Ukraine has explicitly denied involvement in the attack and ISIS has claimed responsibility. 2/
US officials have told media that the claim of responsibility by the Islamic State appears to be credible.
Three days before the attack the U.S. warned Russia about a possibility. Putin dismissed the warning as “blackmail” 3/