The university is reiterating its commitment to free expression but indicting that the protestors are violating time, manner, place restrictions and risking campus safety:
A reporter was arrested yesterday but later released. It sounds like charges will not be pursued.
Later in the evening, the students said the administration brought Panera Bread for security but was denying food and bathroom access to students.
They were peeing in bottles.
Some students started to realize they might get arrested while trying to report that one young woman was in danger of toxic shock:
In the end, four students were arrested (three inside and one outside), and all the students inside were given interim suspensions, which means they can’t be on campus and had to leave by 5pm local yesterday.
BREAKING: Harvard has reversed course and will require applicants to submit standardized tests scores in the next application cycle.
“For the Class of 2029 admissions cycle, Harvard will require submission of scores for the SAT or ACT. In exceptional cases in which applicants are unable to access SAT or ACT testing, other eligible tests will be accepted.”
Harvard had previously announced it would remain test optional through the next two admissions cycles:
The reasons given for the change are similar to those offered by other colleges, i.e., withholding tests scores hurts some students during the admissions process:
“In essence, they tried to break us. They tried to break our bodies, they tried to break our spirits.”
One of the Vanderbilt protestors speaks after their 21-hour sit-in:
h/t @lawyergonerogue
"We were deprived of medical attention, we were deprived of sleep, we were deprived of food, water, resources."
"In jail I experienced better conditions than at Vanderbilt University."
A Vanderbilt protestor who was arrested talks about his experiences:
H/t @lawyergonerogue
"We hear a lot about cruelty in this world. From Palestine to Nashville, our oppressors are the same. They use the same tactics, they consult with each other."
"We were dealing with some pretty evil people yesterday."
When Dartmouth, Yale, and Brown reinstituted standardized testing in admissions, they said it would help them to admit more diverse classes.
The NYT explores a few basic models to illustrate how they can use class as a proxy for race to do so.
🧵
The basic idea is to correct for the facts that lower income students tend to do worse on the SAT and that black and Hispanic applicants tend to be poorer.
The first option is to just give low-income students a bump on their SAT scores.
However, “income is a…weak proxy for race in admissions” because while “Black families are over-represented among poorer households in America,” “there are still many more poorer white households.”