Why don’t more professors object to race-based discrimination in faculty hiring?

Consider the story of 79-year-old UC Riverside Professor Emeritus Perry Link.

He objected to “boosting” a candidate based on race and was subjected to a nearly two-year inquisition.

🧵 In response to the attempt to boost the candidate, he wrote,

“[Candidate X] is lively and charming—and yes, Black, which is great—but I can’t say that I found his sophistication and experience up to the level of our top candidates.”

He also expressed concern that his “colleagues would…make the applicant’s race their ‘overriding criterion.’”

NEW: Students at Sarah Lawrence College have published a strategy guide in which they say they were ANSWERING THE CALL OF HAMAS when they recently occupied a building and set up an encampment on campus.

🧵
They call themselves “fighters in the Student Intifada” and declare that “the third stage of the Student Intifada at SLC has just begun.”

BREAKING: The University of Michigan will stop using DEI statements in faculty hiring and promotion.

The decision was made by Provost Laurie McCauley and announced this morning.

This is a great day for @UMich and American higher education!

🧵 A faculty committee recommended that the university “Discourage Solicitation of Standalone Diversity Statements” but didn’t want to give up screening faculty for their DEI commitments…

🧵 Colleges have committed themselves to partisan political values, and now they “have no compelling justification for their existence to give when the opposing political party comes into power. We have nothing to say to the half of America who doesn’t share our politics.” Colleges expected to be able to advance their political agendas without external opposition, but that is changing:

NEW: The University System of Georgia has:

-Banned DEI statements in hiring and admissions.

-Added free expression training to student orientation.

-Declared political neutrality.

-Required the teaching of the Declaration, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and more.

🧵 These policies were passed by the System’s Board of Regents last week.

Here are the new policies against DEI statements in admissions and hiring (changes highlighted):

BREAKING: The University of Michigan student government has impeached its anti-Israel president and vice-president for:

-incitement to violence;

-cyber theft; and,

-dereliction of duty.

The students are taking their government back.

🧵 The impeachment comes after students outmaneuvered the activists running their government and restored funding for student activities:

https://twitter.com/sfmcguire79/status/1844355246686077188

NEW: What could the new Trump administration mean for Columbia University?

A nonpartisan concerned group, @StandColumbia, has calculated that it could cost the university a catastrophic $3.5 billion per year — over half its annual budget.

How?

🧵 First, the government could stop awarding grants to Columbia.

The group calculates this could cost the university $50-200 million per year in the short-term and add up to 1.329 billion per year in the long-term.

“Writing ‘f*ck you Boeing’ is free speech and fully protected; preventing Boeing from discussing jobs with students is not. Calling someone a ‘kapo’ is offensive, but protected speech; breaking through a police line is not.”

Cornell President Kotlikoff explains free speech:

🧵 Referring to the disciplinary measures taken against students who disrupted a career fair, a
student asked him:

“Why are you punishing students for free speech?”

He explained the difference protected speech and illegitimate violations of the rights of others.

“At first I was stunned. I found it hard to believe that a book…could be blacklisted simply because of the…word ‘Israel’ on its cover.”

“But here we are. It seems that no Jewish author, no one remotely connected to Judaism, is safe from this kind of exclusion.”

—@BHL “Curbing this hate begins by going to the source. That’s why I will soon visit North American university campuses most impacted by this disgraceful rhetoric and violence and plead not only for Israel, but for the defense of free speech.”

🧵Harvard Librarian Martha Whitehead on libraries as sanctuaries:

“Libraries are cherished as the soul of our colleges and universities.”

“Outside the library walls, information and viewpoints constantly rush towards [students]. Inside, they pursue their own lines of inquiry.” “Opposing perspectives routinely confront each other in our collections.”

“Libraries are places where everyone should feel both welcome and able to focus on their own pursuits.”

NEW: The task force on Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias at UCLA surveyed 428 Jewish faculty, students, and staff.

The results are devastating.

“Two-thirds of respondents reported that antisemitism is a problem or a serious problem at UCLA and three-quarters reported that anti-Israeli bias is a problem or serious problem.”

“Three-quarters of respondents felt that antisemitism is taken less seriously than other forms of hate and discrimination at UCLA.”

“There were over 100 reports of individuals experiencing a physical attack or physical threat.”

”Nearly 40% of respondents (N=394), noted that they experienced antisemitic discrimination at UCLA.”

”Almost half (49%) of the undergraduate student respondents reported that teaching assistants engaged in behaviors that included offensive comments, verbal attacks, or discrimination, and 76% reported that their peers engaged in these behaviors.”

“One-third of respondents indicated that they had made an informal or formal complaint to UCLA because of mistreatment or discrimination based on their Jewish or Israeli identity.” Some comments on the encampment:

“The rote incantations of a state religion.”

This is an incredible exposé of academic DEI.

It confirms so many things critics of DEI have been saying for years.

Better late than never, NYT!

Some highlights:

🧵 The most common attitude toward DEI at UMich, even among those committed to diversity and social justice, is “wary disdain.”

People are sick of it.

And the NYT gives the signal. It’s officially over for the campus protestors in the court of public opinion: “The pro-Palestinian group that sparked the student encampment movement at Columbia University in response to the Israel-Hamas war is becoming more hard-line in its rhetoric, openly supporting militant groups fighting Israel and rescinding an apology it made after one of its members said the school was lucky he wasn’t out killing Zionists.”

🧵NEW: Claremont students marked Oct 7 by occupying and vandalizing a building at Pomona College.

They disrupted classes and injured a public safety officer.

A Jewish girl said she was trapped inside and too afraid to try to leave.

Others escaped through a second floor window: This is what the Jewish girl said: “We couldn’t leave because they were in the building blocking the doors and everything. I wasn’t going to walk through the middle of it… I wouldn’t have felt very safe walking through hundreds of people yelling things that [I] especially as a Jewish student don’t align with or feel safe around.”

Examples of American college faculty and students who expressed their support for terrorism on the anniversary of October 7.

Please add others than I’m missing in the replies.

🧵 Penn:

🧵Harvard asked its students, faculty, and teaching staff about their comfort discussing controversial issues on campus.

The results show that faculty/staff are more fearful than students.

68% of faculty/staff said they would be reluctant to speak up outside the classroom. Only 38% of students said the same — that they would be reluctant to speak up during a discussion of a controversial issue outside the classroom.

This guy is one of the lead protestors at Cornell.

When the student government denied his group’s divestment resolution, he and others vowed to repeatedly disrupt the campus, which they did.

He was suspended last year too.

Looks like Cornell might be done messing around. In case you’re tempted to feel bad for Taal, here’s what he said when the Cornell student assembly rejected his divestment resolution:

🎉🎉🎉

All on the same day:

1. Stanford’s board of trustees commends the faculty senate on its institutional neutrality statement.

2. Penn leadership declares a policy of institutional neutrality.

3. Yale sets up a committee to consider institutional neutrality.

🧵 Stanford:

https://twitter.com/sfmcguire79/status/1833510796078551421

NEW: Students at @SarahLawrence are boycotting my friend, @SamuelAbramsAEI, because he’s a “proud Zionist and advocates for Israel’s right to self-defense.”

As he shows in the piece below, they were private messaging prospective students and telling them to boycott him.

🧵 As Sam writes in @MindingCampus, “this tactic of directly messaging students is a chilling evolution of cancel culture that threatens speech, expression, learning, and open inquiry.”
mindingthecampus.org/2024/08/27/the…

BREAKING: MIT has published the profile of its incoming class, the first admitted in the wake of the SCOTUS decision again affirmative action.

Here is a chart comparing the ethnic profile of last year's class to this one: MIT’s director of admissions says, “As a baseline, in recent years around 25% of our enrolling undergraduate students have identified as Black, Hispanic, and/or Native American and Pacific Islander. For the incoming Class of 2028, that number is about 16%.”

BREAKING: Johns Hopkins University has adopted a “posture of restraint” on public statements.

Such statements should be made “only in the limited circumstances where an issue is clearly related to a direct, concrete, and demonstrable interest or function of the university.” The university’s leaders say, “the very idea of an ‘official’ position of the university on a social, scientific, or political issue runs counter to our foundational ethos.”