This thread will trigger a troll feeding frenzy. But I think it's necessary. It's time to summarize a timeline of COVID vaccine statistics and what they say about whether the vaccines reduced transmission or not, and whether "experts" lied or not. Here goes...
(Thread [1/17])
To begin, let's remember that vaccines seek to do 4 things, in descending order of importance and likelihood: 1. prevent death 2. prevent hospitalization 3. prevent symptomatic disease 4. prevent infection & transmission
[2/17]
2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan variant.
To receive Emergency Use Authorization, vaccine did NOT need to stop transmission (though that would have been nice). Criterion was reduction in symptomatic disease by >50%, which was met and exceeded.
[4/17] fda.gov/media/139638/d…
Even so, those original COVID vaccine formulations DID reduce transmission, as shown in multiple studies in early 2021.
[5/17]
Throughout 2021, evidence was mounting that COVID vaccines were indeed significantly curtailing transmission. Every sign pointed to the pandemic ending early if we could get enough people vaccinated quickly.
[6/17] science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
This was when some countries brought in vaccine passports, which made scientific sense. (You can debate the ethics elsewhere.) By slowing mixing of vaccinated & unvaccinated populations, risk of breakthrough infections was reduced.
[7/17] cmaj.ca/content/194/16…
The emergence of Delta variant changed the math considerably. Two doses of vaccine were still ~70% effective at preventing Delta infection, which was pretty darned good! We could still tame the pandemic with vaccination if we did it fast enough...
[8/17] ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Then the emergence of Omicron (noticeably in Canada in late 2021) changed everything by curtailing vaccine efficacy. This is when vax passports stopped making sense, as they were disproportionately exposing vaxxed people to the virus, though they had diminished protection.
[9/17]
By 2022, it was clear that vaccination was no longer subduing transmission *significantly*. But 3 doses of gave substantial protection against death for both delta (80%) and omicron (78%), along with 61% protection against admission to hospital.
But beware the narrative of the vaccine minimizers. The original vaccine could STILL reduce Omicron transmission somewhat.
[11/17] gavi.org/vaccineswork/n…
A telling California prison study in 2023 found that *one dose of any COVID vaccine* reduced the probability of an infected inmate transmitting infection to his cellmate by 24%. Again, that's reduced TRANSMISSION.
[12/17] nature.com/articles/s4159…
The bivalent booster came out in Sep/2022. It was able to prevent actual infection by ~54%, which means it was also significantly slowing transmission. Yet uptake was poor.
[13/17]
Newest XBB1.5 booster also has an efficacy of ~54% against symptomatic infection. This is not as great as the 95% we saw in 2020, but it's pretty damned good! Yet currently only 16% of Canadians have received this vaccine.
[15/17] cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
A robust meta-study of secondary attack rates throughout the pandemic found that all the vaccines offered some degree of reduction in TRANSMISSION, regardless of the variant:
What's the takeaway? 1. COVID mRNA vaccines work. 2. They have always worked. 3. They work best when the vaccine is updated to match the current variant. 4. They have always reduced transmission. 5. They still reduce transmission. 6. Nobody lied to you.
[17/17]
Oops, those last 2 links are broken. Here are the proper ones:
Thanks to the Treasury Board of Canada for inviting me to serve as a panelist yesterday, which was broadcast to thousands of government communicators across the country. Here are 12 of my comments, which I will attempt to weave into a paper at a later date:
Thread [1/13]
1. Disinformation is asymmetrical warfare, akin to terrorism. Ethical institutions do not use it, but must contend with the unethical institutions that do.
[2/13]
2. Disinformation merchants have mastered "plain language" and other methods of appealing to the masses, while we still struggle to talk to people in ways that energize them.
The overwhelming weight of scientific evidence says that vaccines do NOT cause autism. The link has been studied many many times. Here is just a taste of the mountains of peer-reviewed evidence:
Thread [1/9]
Madsen et al., 2002, NEJM
- > 537K Danish children
-Compared autism rates in MMR-vaccinated vs unvaccinated
-Result: No increased risk of autism among vaccinated children
-“provides strong evidence against” the hypothesis that MMR causes autism
Hviid et al., 2019,
-657K children
-Tested: overall risk, “susceptible” subgroups, and temporal clustering after MMR.
-Result: No increased risk for autism, no triggering in supposedly susceptible children, no clustering after vaccination
Raw milk can harbor dangerous bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter, Brucella, and parasites like Cryptosporidium
A common clapback from measles minimizers is that, "Measles was no big deal when I was a kid. Everyone had it. So why are you so panicky now?"
Let's break it down with some national Canadian data...
Thread [1/6]
Measles vaccination became widely available in 1963. The superior MMR vaccine was only introduced in Canada i 1975.
Before 1963, Canadians saw 300k-400K cases per year. Back then, pretty much EVERYONE was guaranteed to be infected by age 15, hence the blasé attitude.
[2/6]
But hidden in those stats are these numbers:
-10–15% of cases per year required hospitalization (i.e. 40 THOUSAND cases), for pneumonia, encephalitis, or severe dehydration
-With a mortality rate of 0.1%, there were 300–500 deaths per year, mostly in children under 5.
-In wealthy countries, 0.1%-0.2% of measles cases result in death
-In poorer countries or populations, up to 10% of cases will die
-15-30% of measles cases will require hospitalization
Thread [1/8]
But it ain't just about death or hospitalization.
-5-10% of cases will result in hearing loss
-0.1% will have permanent neurological damage (higher among <12 month olds)
-up to 40% will have increased risk of other infections for months or years ("immune memory loss")
[2/8]
MMR vaccine is highly efficacious against measles symptomatic infection:
-1 dose: 93% effective
-2 doses: 97% effective
Before MMR, the live attenuated vaccine conferred 93-95% protection. (Those of us born before 1970-ish)
Not a day goes by when I don't worry about the mounting dementia epidemic. Biological and demographic factors have put us on a path toward high burden of this disease in Canada.
The number of single (and mostly childless) Canadians is also mounting. This translates to a growing number of elderly who will not have built-in family caregivers (which are never guaranteed, even in the tightest of families)
[2/4]
The amount of caregivers needed will explode. But if we can delay onset of the disease, then the need for investment in caregiving diminishes substantially.