Leaked audio from the North-West Sydney Football Association.
The Flying Bats is a lesbian soccer club founded in the 1980s. They have since competed in the North-West Sydney female soccer competition.
The Flying Bats won the pre-season final last weekend 4-0. On their way to the final they won all their games including a 10-0 win. Five of the Flying Bats team are trans-women.
On 17 March six of the other clubs in the competition held an informal meeting at the Ranch Hotel in North Ryde. They wanted to discuss their concerns around how implausible it has become for any team to win against the Flying Bats as well as physical safety concerns.
Options discussed included the teams entering an alternate competition or for other teams to simply boycott games scheduled against the Flying Bats.
Word of that informal meeting got around and so on 20 March the North-West Sydney Football Association convened a formal meeting. The CEO of Football NSW John Tsatsimas was in attendance.
That meeting went for around an hour and a half.
This is the first of three audio highlights.
Question from the audience:
‘What are you going to do if we forfeit games?’
Answer: ‘Well if you forfeit two games in the season there would be disciplinary action handed out. If there was a concerted efforts by teams to forfeit games against a particular opposition that would be viewed as an act of discrimination.’
2/3.
In this audio, one of the club presidents says:
'A couple of years ago one of the Flying Bats players broke one of our players legs in two places. She’s no longer playing football. As a small club I’ve lost 24 players and that’s a direct result of not wanting to play against the Flying Bats.'
3/3.
In this audio an official says:
'The policy in our association is that you’re entitled to play in the gender to which you identify. The board is currently working on a diversity and inclusion policy and that’s what it says because we have to say it – it’s what we’re required to say and its what we want to say.’
Would be keen to understand why 'we have to say it.' Where's that coming from??
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Please read my ACMA submission re the Disinformation Bill.
'The only opinion that should be banned is the opinion of every politician and bureaucrat pushing this Bill. They should be sent to re-education camps and on release spend the rest of their lives on a watchlist.'
2/8. “Thank you Mr Vice President. In reference to that article in the Atlantic … what does it tell you about Trump’s soul and the life he leads? #SovietMedia#MAGA
3/8. “Mr Biden thank you. You said today was the angriest you’ve ever been as a presidential candidate but you said you were trying to restrain yourself. Your supporters are asking, ‘why aren’t you angrier about this?” #SovietMedia#MAGA
At the 2016 presidential election, almost 300,000 people voted in Washington DC. 4% voted Trump.
The Swamp utterly detested Trump. They said his policies and his style were ghastly but that wasn't the Swamp's problem.
2/13. The professional political class were most appalled because Trump was just a private citizen who walked off the street and into the White House.
That is meant to be the democratic ideal in a great republic but there was nothing like it since Andrew Jackson in 1828.
3/13. What made the pain of Trump winning so acute was that the Democrat HQ, the Clinton campaign and their friends in the media spent the entire Republican primary season cheering Trump on thinking he'd be so easy to beat.
1. Australia’s federal Health Minister Greg Hunt tells us:
“The early scenarios we saw were absolutely real. If Australia had done nothing the virus would have ripped through the Australian community and led to massive human loss.”
2. Paul Kelly in The Australian tells us if we doubt that view we are ‘malicious’ and belong to the 'populist right.'
Golly. Why the vitriol? Is the establishment defensive over claims they have over-reacted and unnecessarily harmed the economy?
3. A month ago we were told Australia faced 150,000 virus deaths and today we have less than 100. Is that success because of the lockdown?
Let’s soberly consider the data.
Since 90% + of nations are in lockdown it’s hard to compare but we do have a few valuable outliers.