☀️👀 Profile picture
Mar 28 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Suzy Weiss, sister of genocidal Zionist Bari Weiss who killed Refaat Alareer, is now writing for her propaganda rag where she focuses on smearing pro-Palestinian students as overly privileged coddled snowflakes. Here is how Suzy reacted when she failed to get into an Ivy:
it is absurd that hysterical genocidal Zionist actual privileged snowflake freaks like Suzy Weiss are projecting their own pathological fragilities onto pro-Palestine students. Look at how they cry and demand safe spaces for their depraved Zionism:
Suzy Weiss, one of the most deranged Zionist coddled snowflakes along with her sister Bari who started campaigns to get her Professors fired, used the phrase: "Campus safety culture combined with hyper-aggressive Karen behavior" to refer to others

Zionist projection is insane Image
Bari and Suzy Weiss and the rest of the Zionist propaganda complex focused on pushing censorship on colleges love nothing more than ridiculing as "snowflakes" anyone who dares resist their genocidal apartheid occupation regime. But this is who they are:
Suzy Weiss described how she went into shock and cried uncontrollably when she found out she was too much of a pathetic failure to get into an Ivy, and decided to blame the "blacks and browns" like the depraved scum she is. But others are "coddled overly privileged snowflakes"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ☀️👀

☀️👀 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zei_squirrel

Mar 30
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty have confirmed that the Israeli regime's forced tortured "confession" videos to push their genocidal "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax should not be considered as credible evidence. The Guardian's Bethan McKernan did so in two separate articles Image
what Bethan McKernan did in the pages of the Guardian in two articles that are still frequently cited in Western media, including by the New York Times, as credible reporting on the "mass rape" hoax breaches every basic journalistic and ethical standard
Bethan McKernan's Guardian regurgitation of the "mass rape" hoax is the most extreme, deranged version. Not even Gettleman, Sella and Schwartz went to these lengths in their hoax. She laundered Israeli intelligence claims of "video footage of mass rapes":
Read 9 tweets
Mar 30
BREAKING: The New York Times claimed extensive "visual evidence" of "targeted genital mutilation" and "inserting of objects [knives and nails] into vaginas" as part of its "mass rape" hoax. This was definitively debunked by the UN report, stating there is no such visual evidence Image
the claim of extensive "visual evidence" with repeated statements of "We saw a photo of cut up vaginas, nails in vaginas, knives in vaginas" is strewn throughout the original Gettleman, Sella, Schwartz hoax to browbeat the reader into submission. But it was all a contrived facade
the claim of "nails/knives in vaginas" is the most lurid part of the "mass rape" hoax that is constantly repeated even after its debunking. Its primary source is of course a Zaka hoaxer, Simcha Greinman. The NYT piece from December 4 begins with his tale of that disgusting lie Image
Read 18 tweets
Mar 29
yesterday the Israeli regime posted a tortured forced "confession" debunked long ago. No respectable Western media outlet reported it and the UN report also rejected this as evidence

only one outlet repeatedly cited this as credible evidence of the "mass rape" hoax: The Guardian Image
the NYT's Gettleman, Sella and Schwartz did not use these tortured "confessions" in their own hoax. That was too unethical and depraved for even them to directly cite

so instead in their follow-up to their "mass rape" hoax they cited The Guardian which uses the "confessions" Image
do you see how this works? Gettleman, Sella and Schwartz and the NYT decided that using forced tortured "confessions" destroys their credibility and is insanely unethical. So instead of directly using it themselves, they prominently put it on the pages of the NYT via The Guardian
Read 18 tweets
Mar 29
I want to formally apologize to Patrick Kingsley and Ronen Bergman of the New York Times for calling them hoaxer propagandists based on an ambiguity. I deleted the thread and I hereby formally retract it.

now will you retract openly and provably lying repeatedly in the NYT? Image
I'm sorry @PatrickKingsley. I deleted the thread within an hour after I saw it pointed out that there's actually ambiguity in the phrasing of the UN report about survivors.

will you retract repeating all these proven debunked falsehoods and apologize for it? Image
@PatrickKingsley I'm not the New York Times, but I have a basic sense of integrity and ethics. So when it's pointed out that I was wrong about something, I'll admit it, I apologize, I retract publicly. But the NYT continues to publish Patrick Kingsley and stand by Gettleman, Schwartz and Sella
Read 7 tweets
Mar 29
BREAKING: The NYT reports Amit Soussana spoke to the UN team. The UN report states they spoke with released hostages, but none who said they were victims of sexual violence. So the NYT has inadvertently confirmed she did not repeat her story of sexual assault to the UN. Oh my god Image
the NYT knew people would ask what Amit Soussana did with the UN mission and they keep referencing its conclusion of hostages having suffered sexualized violence to bolster Amit's testimony. But she didn't give them that testimony. The report explicitly says she didn't. Holy shit Image
when Brie brought this to light right after the piece was published, I thought it was really bizarre, and also took note of it in my thread. But it's not just some strange oversight. It undermines the entire testimony. She lied to the UN mission. It's over
Read 10 tweets
Mar 29
the NYT didn't dare allow Jeffrey Gettleman, Adam Sella and Anat Schwartz do their dramatized 4000 word profile of an uncorroborated allegation of one instance of unspecified "sexual assault". Instead they went to Patrick Kingsley and Ronen Bergman, who lied about the UNRWA hoax: Image
as Norman notes, the Israeli regime gave their fabricated UNRWA hoax dossier to Patrick Kingsley and Ronen Bergman, and then they explicitly lied about it, claiming it showed a dozen Palestinian UNRWA employees being involved in October 7, when it was just four. NYT "reporting"
more by Norman on the propaganda operations Patrick Kingsley laundered for the Israeli regime via the New York Times, a series of hoaxes that would make Jeffrey Gettleman, Anat Schwartz and Adam Sella blush with shame. And he's now their "credible reporter on sexual assault" Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(