Crémieux Profile picture
Mar 28 27 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Paleo artists often "shrink wrap" fossilized animal depictions

The T-Rex, Utahraptor, Triceratops—popular depictions of each of these animals shows skin so close to bone that it might be unrealistic

So let's shrink-wrap existing animals🧵

Can you guess what this is? Image
Preemptive note: All of this artwork is from C.M. Koseman, whose book (which is way more extensive than this thread) and some other material is linked at the end of the thread.

The last animal was a rhinoceros—the thing with the cooling heat sail!

Any idea what this animal is? Image
That last one might seem to be a dog, but it's actually a horse.

It's not so clear what this graceful beast might be. Image
The last picture was of a cow.

What about this monster? Its jaws can crush a steel car. Image
That metal-breaker was a hippopotamus.

This pack-hunting animal has a killer stare and wields a set of five switchblade claws on its forefeet. What might it be? Image
That was the house cat.

This one's a bit more mysterious, and clearly adapted to be a stealthy predator, right? Image
If you guessed that was a spider monkey, kudos to you. Future paleontologists might consider it an arboreal variation on humans, its cursorial relatives.

What of this one? It's not clear to future paleontologists if it's quadrupedal or bipedal. Image
That's the toad, which paleontologists might consider to be a long-legged forest ambler.

Any idea what this one is? Without preserved feathers, guessing might be hard! Image
If you guessed "Vulture", you're correct. But you probably didn't guess that!

You almost certainly won't guess this one. Image
That was a species of casque-headed hornbill, and paleontologists might suspect they use the casque for mating rituals. But we don't even know what they do with them in many cases today!

How's about this twofer? Note predator and prey: Image
If you guessed the "Swan" and the "Tadpole" (mistakenly believed to be a form of fish), then you were right.

What about this cute little predator? Image
That was an iguana, and due to fur being found on other small vertebrates like rats, it's assumed to have fur too.

Who's this courser? Image
That was a rabbit, but we wouldn't know it because posture is poorly preserved in fossils!

Now this one is simultaneously reassuring and disheartening. What might it be? Image
That's a python, and it might be assumed to have feet to support its body, much like the lizards its skeleton resembles. After all, we only have fragmentary remains!

Who's this guy? Image
That's a manatee. Remember, habitats change. A sea creature might be found in what's now a forested mountain. We might also only have remains like skulls.

This guy has a balloon-like facial sac. What might he be? Image
That's a bull elephant, and because no other animals have long, muscular appendages, he ends up with a face sac instead of his well-known trunk.

Time to dive underwater.

This one might seem to be a dolphin, but think outside the box. Image
It's a sperm whale, incorrectly believed to be a hunter of large pray. You know, like sharks.

What's this kelp forest stalker? Image
Why that's a bowhead whale of course! And as we know from its skeleton's extensible jaws, it must prey on animals as large as itself!

Going back to the land, who are we looking at now? Image
Because of its complicated nasal sinuses, the baboon might be assumed to have had venom glands and to have been a coursing hunter!

These guys have curved foot claws, sometimes serrated bills, and wings shorter than their legs. They must be vampiric! Image
But that's not the case, it's just an odd animal. It's a hummingbird, the only animal in its strange niche, and thus a prime candidate for misinterpretation!

Finally, who the hell is this? Image
That might be the first example of shrink wrapping and distorting the fossil record: the animal proposed to be pre-flood man, or Homo diluvii by Johann Jakob Scheuchzer in 1726

But though he thought he had evidence for the flood, he was describing the fossil of a salamander!Image
How we think about ancient animals is probably distorted by a tendency to shrink wrap their depictions and a desire to find function in form.

But much of what we observe in animals today, we still can't explain. Skin also drags, and feathers and fur abound (but not universally).
If you want to see more on this subject, I recommend the whole book, which contains many more illustrations and details for all of them.

Get it here: amazon.com/All-Yesterdays…
And if you're interested in speculation about possible futures, C.M. Koseman's All Tomorrows is spectacular. You can see it summarized on YouTube, here:
Koseman isn't the only person to have illustrated this issue either.

This opossum, for example, comes from the HowStuffWorks Tumblr:

Here's more: howstuffworks.tumblr.com/post/512612262…
imgur.com/a/BEz4r
Image
There is an error in describing sperm whales in the thread:

The issue is more that they would probably be thought of as behaving like sharks in the far future, but they're actually pretty social and frequently team players.
The artist for All Yesterdays and All Tomorrows has a Twitter account:

The opossum artist also has an account:

And the artist behind the inflated T-rex is apparently the creator of One Punch Man:
twitter.com/NixIllustration
twitter.com/NEBU_KURO

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Crémieux

Crémieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cremieuxrecueil

Jun 27
The whole "nanny dog" thing is made up and there is no historical evidence that pit bulls were ever bred to be stewards or friends to children.

The evidence for that myth is basically 'someone said it on Facebook.' Image
Even many sources that are favorable towards pit bulls or active promoters of them will occasionally admit there's no real basis for the "nanny dog" claim.

Example 1: web.archive.org/web/2024022709…
Image
Example 2: (I know the "loyal and loving demeanor" claim is false. I am posting this for the admission of myth.) web.archive.org/web/2024022505…
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 20
Yesterday was Juneteenth, a federal holiday in the U.S. dedicated to celebrating the day the last slaves in America were freed when the Emancipation Proclamation was enforced in Texas.

Economically, what were the fates of slaves? What about slaveowners?

🧵 Image
Starting with slaves, a paper that came out last year looked into the matter.

The paper used Census and administrative records from 1850 to 2000 to compare Black Americans whose ancestors were enslaved for different amounts of time.

Compare these trajectories: Image
One thing that stands out is that, in terms of literacy, there's a lot of convergence. In terms of occupational quality, not so much.

Depending on how you think, this might be obvious or a surprise.

The reason could have to do with Jim Crow.Image
Read 22 tweets
Jun 20
In 2014, David Graeber wrote an article for the Guardian in which he argued "Working-class people... care more about their friends, families, and communities. In aggregate... they're just fundamentally nicer."

The Economist put up a similar article at the time.

Were they right? Image
To make his case, Graeber wove a nice little narrative together about how the rich don't need to care, so they don't, and thus they're bad at empathy and they do things like hiring out the sons and daughters of the poor to do the job when empathy is needed. Image
The meat of Graeber's case was a set of two social psychological papers.

The first was a set of three studies in which the poor appeared to outclass the rich at tasks like the Mind in the Eyes, or figuring out the emotions of people they're talking to. Image
Read 20 tweets
May 30
Over a decade ago, researchers started a trial to see if they could prevent peanut allergies

They gave a few hundred kids peanuts from ages one to five and told parents of another group to have their kids avoid the stuff

Peanut consumption reduced peanut allergy rates by a lot:Image
The initial trial and assessment (ages 1-5) was called LEAP. The follow-up at six years of age was called LEAP-On, and it involved asking kids to abstain from peanuts for a year to see if allergy rate differences persisted.

As you can see above, they did.
By the long-term follow-up, we still see a roughly 70% reduction in rates of peanut allergy.

So this annoying condition (for both sufferers and those who have to accommodate them) can be mostly eliminated by mere exposure.
Read 4 tweets
May 28
In 1942, the U.S. government forcibly removed more than 110,000 ethnically Japanese people from their homes and sent them to internment camps in remote parts of the country.

People are resilient, but losing everything is hard.

How did victims' lives turn out?🧵 Image
First, we need background.

Japanese citizens began arriving to the U.S. in the latter part of the 19th century.

The scale of migration was substantial. By 1942, 40% of Hawaii was Japanese (Hawaii wasn't a state until 1959). Image
This influx of immigrants quickly became a political problem.

1886-1911, more than 400,000 Japanese set out to American lands. Citizens called for an end, resulting in the Gentleman's Agreement of 1907:

The U.S. wouldn't harass its Japanese and Japan would restrict emigration. Image
Read 26 tweets
May 25
2024 is the hottest year on record, and it's been hotter than 2023 in part because of a global ban on shipping fuels containing sulfur dioxide.

Problem: SO2 causes acid rain, but it cools the globe. How can we just stay cool?

A new company might have found the solution.

🧵Image
Acid rain has been on the decline for many years, but in order to finally put the problem to rest, it'll be crucial to knock out sulfur dioxide emissions from shipping.

Globally, those emissions have been concentrated in these boxed-in regions where ships go to-and-fro. Image
When the International Maritime Organization 2020 regulation went into effect, roughly 80% of sulfur dioxide emissions from international shipping went away overnight. Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(