Crémieux Profile picture
Mar 28, 2024 27 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Paleo artists often "shrink wrap" fossilized animal depictions

The T-Rex, Utahraptor, Triceratops—popular depictions of each of these animals shows skin so close to bone that it might be unrealistic

So let's shrink-wrap existing animals🧵

Can you guess what this is? Image
Preemptive note: All of this artwork is from C.M. Koseman, whose book (which is way more extensive than this thread) and some other material is linked at the end of the thread.

The last animal was a rhinoceros—the thing with the cooling heat sail!

Any idea what this animal is? Image
That last one might seem to be a dog, but it's actually a horse.

It's not so clear what this graceful beast might be. Image
The last picture was of a cow.

What about this monster? Its jaws can crush a steel car. Image
That metal-breaker was a hippopotamus.

This pack-hunting animal has a killer stare and wields a set of five switchblade claws on its forefeet. What might it be? Image
That was the house cat.

This one's a bit more mysterious, and clearly adapted to be a stealthy predator, right? Image
If you guessed that was a spider monkey, kudos to you. Future paleontologists might consider it an arboreal variation on humans, its cursorial relatives.

What of this one? It's not clear to future paleontologists if it's quadrupedal or bipedal. Image
That's the toad, which paleontologists might consider to be a long-legged forest ambler.

Any idea what this one is? Without preserved feathers, guessing might be hard! Image
If you guessed "Vulture", you're correct. But you probably didn't guess that!

You almost certainly won't guess this one. Image
That was a species of casque-headed hornbill, and paleontologists might suspect they use the casque for mating rituals. But we don't even know what they do with them in many cases today!

How's about this twofer? Note predator and prey: Image
If you guessed the "Swan" and the "Tadpole" (mistakenly believed to be a form of fish), then you were right.

What about this cute little predator? Image
That was an iguana, and due to fur being found on other small vertebrates like rats, it's assumed to have fur too.

Who's this courser? Image
That was a rabbit, but we wouldn't know it because posture is poorly preserved in fossils!

Now this one is simultaneously reassuring and disheartening. What might it be? Image
That's a python, and it might be assumed to have feet to support its body, much like the lizards its skeleton resembles. After all, we only have fragmentary remains!

Who's this guy? Image
That's a manatee. Remember, habitats change. A sea creature might be found in what's now a forested mountain. We might also only have remains like skulls.

This guy has a balloon-like facial sac. What might he be? Image
That's a bull elephant, and because no other animals have long, muscular appendages, he ends up with a face sac instead of his well-known trunk.

Time to dive underwater.

This one might seem to be a dolphin, but think outside the box. Image
It's a sperm whale, incorrectly believed to be a hunter of large pray. You know, like sharks.

What's this kelp forest stalker? Image
Why that's a bowhead whale of course! And as we know from its skeleton's extensible jaws, it must prey on animals as large as itself!

Going back to the land, who are we looking at now? Image
Because of its complicated nasal sinuses, the baboon might be assumed to have had venom glands and to have been a coursing hunter!

These guys have curved foot claws, sometimes serrated bills, and wings shorter than their legs. They must be vampiric! Image
But that's not the case, it's just an odd animal. It's a hummingbird, the only animal in its strange niche, and thus a prime candidate for misinterpretation!

Finally, who the hell is this? Image
That might be the first example of shrink wrapping and distorting the fossil record: the animal proposed to be pre-flood man, or Homo diluvii by Johann Jakob Scheuchzer in 1726

But though he thought he had evidence for the flood, he was describing the fossil of a salamander!Image
How we think about ancient animals is probably distorted by a tendency to shrink wrap their depictions and a desire to find function in form.

But much of what we observe in animals today, we still can't explain. Skin also drags, and feathers and fur abound (but not universally).
If you want to see more on this subject, I recommend the whole book, which contains many more illustrations and details for all of them.

Get it here: amazon.com/All-Yesterdays…
And if you're interested in speculation about possible futures, C.M. Koseman's All Tomorrows is spectacular. You can see it summarized on YouTube, here:
Koseman isn't the only person to have illustrated this issue either.

This opossum, for example, comes from the HowStuffWorks Tumblr:

Here's more: howstuffworks.tumblr.com/post/512612262…
imgur.com/a/BEz4r
Image
There is an error in describing sperm whales in the thread:

The issue is more that they would probably be thought of as behaving like sharks in the far future, but they're actually pretty social and frequently team players.
The artist for All Yesterdays and All Tomorrows has a Twitter account:

The opossum artist also has an account:

And the artist behind the inflated T-rex is apparently the creator of One Punch Man:
twitter.com/NixIllustration
twitter.com/NEBU_KURO

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Crémieux

Crémieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cremieuxrecueil

Dec 31, 2025
The male advantage in strength is insanely large.

Even when men and women are matched on muscle, men tend to be far stronger.

Add in that men tend to be to women like what linebackers are to normal men, and you might wonder how more women aren't constantly in fear. Image
This logic applies very strongly.

Consider this: female athletes are generally weaker than average men! Image
Sex differences in strength are profound.

Sources:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aj…

link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 31, 2025
Let us never forget:

The Father of the American pit bull, one John P. Colby, didn't stop breeding them even after they

KILLED HIS NEPHEW and MAULED HIS SISTER

This breed has been malign since its creation. Excerpt from Pit Bull: The Battle over an American Icon. Page 70.
Pit bulls were also killing disabled people shortly after their invention.

This headline is from 1901.

Basically, what happened is that this woman had an epileptic fit, so her pit bull, being the nanny dog it is, decided to eat through her neck.

Helpful! Image
Even a single year after they were recognized in 1896, they had begun hurting people.

In this instance, one mutilated a woman in front of her four-year-old grandchild. Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 30, 2025
Pit bull breeders often have Instagram accounts where they post stuff like this, showing the creations they've made through having dogs from the same litter rape each other.

For example, "2x Pimpy 3x Bape" means this one was inbred 2x from a dog named "Pimpy" and 3x from "Bape". Image
Typical pit bull family tree: Image
These are advertised on here, unfortunately:

Read 10 tweets
Dec 30, 2025
There is a problem at pet shelters:

They're full because no one wants to adopt the dogs.

Why? Because they're pit bulls, and only the unaware or dim want them.

So, shelters often blatantly lie. Here are some examples. These four are *not* really "Labrador Retrievers": Image
Adoptee: 'What breed is that?'

Employee 1: 'It's a p-'

Employee 2: 'You can't just tell them.'

Employee 2: 'Sir, that's a Corgi.' Image
'Do you think they'll believe this?' Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
The whole "nanny dog" thing is made up. There is no historical evidence that pit bulls were ever bred to be stewards or friends to children.

The evidence for that myth is basically 'someone said it on Facebook'🧵 Image
Even many sources that are favorable towards pit bulls or active promoters of them will occasionally admit there's no real basis for the "nanny dog" claim.

Example: Image
Another example (and yes, I know "loyal and loving demeanor" is a lie; this is posted for the admission of myth): Image
Read 9 tweets
Dec 22, 2025
The Australian pension system is funded through mandatory contributions into private retirement accounts

During the COVID pandemic, the government allowed people to pull up to $20,000 from those accounts decades early

What happened?

Firstly, uneducated people pulled the most: Image
Australia did this because they needed fiscal stimulus.

If they didn't allow people to make early withdrawals from their accounts—which normally remain inaccessible until retirement age—, they would have ended up in a very bad position.

But people did withdraw. Image
About a quarter of those aged >34 withdrew.

The most common amount to take out was $10,000 each time the possibility became available.

All said and done, that typically meant pulling down 51% of the total balance. That also meant foregoing $120,000 on average by retirement! Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(