Every college kid learns that the big bad CIA overthrew the democratically elected moderate progressive Mosaddegh. But Mosaddegh was a Qajar dynast who kept undermining Iranic self-rule—& then carried out 4 coups while plunging his country into total chaos before he was removed…
He was heir to the Turkic rulers of Iran, he married another heir to the Turkic rulers of Iran, he was involved in powerful revolutionary Masonic secret societies, & his political career began in earnest with protests against Reza Shah for beating back the Soviet invasion of Iran
When the US & Soviets forced the 1st Reza Shah to resign during WWII, because he was too anti-communist, Mosaddegh returned to public life, & got the 2nd Reza Shah to appoint him prime minister. Mosaddegh then quickly nationalized oil (among much else)—& so caused Iran’s collapse
“But how does stealing the British oil company cause collapse?” Well he couldn’t get any of the oil onto the market because he chased away all the engineers, workers, tankers, allies, etc—they were too incompetent to sell any of the vast reserves they stole, & so fell into crisis
Mosaddegh was then removed from power—as per the Shah’s constitutional power to select & deselect Prime Ministers—but Mosaddegh whipped up communist & jihadist mobs to attack & threaten the Shah until the Shah reappointed Mosaddegh as PM (this Shah was young & cowardly back then)
Oh wait I forgot that in 1952—after the Abadan Oil Crisis had begun, but before the Shah replaced & then reappointed Mosaddegh—Mosaddegh called elections to solidify his power & just openly flat-out stole the vote (which he wouldn’t have won). & then he demanded the Shah’s powers
That’s what prompted the Shah to briefly pick a different PM than the one who’d caused Iranian oil production to fall by well over 95%—among many other such “progressive reforms”—while alienating Western allies as the Soviets kept trying to invade (eg look up the UNSC’s 1st act).
But then—after Mosaddegh rioted his way back to being PM—he immediately got the parliament he’d picked in the sham 1952 election to vote on two pieces of legislation: 1st—six months of dictatorial power; then—another year of dictatorial power. No specifics, just utter absolutism.
Then in 1953 Mosaddegh put a referendum to the people to just make him dictator forever & dissolve parliament; his thugs managed the vote, & checked everyone’s ballots, & still also probably stuffed it because he got literally 99% of the vote. & then—finally—the Shah removed him.
The Shah had always—thru this crisis—retained this power under the Iranian constitution, but he’d been afraid of using it, & incompetent (eg he tried to send generals to arrest Mosaddegh but Mosaddegh whipped up his partisans to arrest those generals instead). That’s the CIA coup
CIA really did try to pep talk the Shah into using these powers—as the Shah wanted to, but was afraid to—& eg it really bought the Shah’s sister nice mink coats to guilt the Shah into manning up. But the Shah fled to Italy during the referendum—& his generals overthrew Mosaddegh
Literally the day before mass uprisings removed Mosaddegh from power, the CIA was calling it quits in Iran, despairing, preparing to make nice with Mosaddegh, etc, & their memos about the coup express nothing but surprise at it. All they’d done was pay protesters who got jailed…
It should also be noted that the CIA was by no means uniformly anti-Mosaddegh. The protesters they paid were *pro & anti* Mosaddegh, & the Americans most in charge there were (I’m not at all exaggerating) *anti-colonial socialists*: eg look up Kermit Roosevelt Jr & Henry F Grady.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
11 US states & our capital have lower white populations today than they did in 1960; 97 of the 100 most populous US cities in 2020 are less % white than they were in 1960 (& the other 3 didn’t exist in 1960); of the 50 most populous US cities in 1960, only 9 have more whites now.
They ethnically cleansed us from our cities by unleashing savage primitives on us & banning us from fighting back & when we got away that was “white flight boo!!” & they’ve hated the suburbs ever since & we’re supposed to think their intentions were good & their thugs sympathetic
“Uhhh the Supreme Court says that the constitution says you have to let these backwards hateful murderers keep on murdering or else you’re the backwards hateful ones. Also you can’t exclude them from your businesses, neighborhoods, pockets, etc. Ruining inner cities is progress.”
In 2020 I began to remember that maybe the 1st news story I ever really followed was about Chinese town named something like Wuhan getting locked in by CCP & somehow winning. Mom ordered “midbrow” mags—Newsweek, Time—& as teen they reminded me of dentist waiting rooms (👩⚕️🤱🥵👍).
Whenever I was bored & wanted to feel like nurses would imminently smother me with their breasts while going at my mouth I’d flip thru the naturally-sticky (cheap glossy) pages. Didn’t realize news was kayfabe so kept ominously telling people “something will happen in China soon”
At first I’d happily tell people all about the Wukan lockdowns & the revolution they’d surely unleash—after all, the news was promising me this, & Occupy was in the air. But then I realized that even when I relayed what the news said, normies & smarts didn’t buy it or didn’t care
Today I’m practicing empathy. Our grandparents decided that terraforming the cosmos would be less impressive than negroforming the cities. Like teaching Clever Hans to “do math,” or Helen Keller to “write books.” This could be noble if we imagine them as autists with ant colonies
Conspiracy theory: these groups—& plenty of others following the same pattern, from ACLU to SDS & many related terror cells, weird cults, welfare fraudsters, ethnic lobbyists, regulatory capturers etc—only seem so Jewish-ish bc they only care about Charlie Kaufmanning “the goyim”
Yes—“Charlie Kaufmanning” the goyim with gay race communism bc you look down on kulaks is bad; but on an aesthetic level I can appreciate it… like I aesthetically appreciate many earnest movements of young smart fanatical healthy men in uniforms seizing power for extremist cults
Have you ever wondered why suddenly when SCOTUS went crazy, all its crazy decisions were based on manufactured cases, which don’t really show up before then? eg:
-Loving v Virginia: RFK refers a guy in DC literally surnamed *Loving* to the ACLU so it can help him get intentionally arrested pretending to move back to Virginia with his wife, who already had a kid with another man when they got together when she was 17, so they can challenge anti-miscegenation laws with an easy pun that sympathetic journos & teachers will love
-Smith v Allwright: NAACP deliberately selected specific black voters in Texas to attempt to vote in the Democratic primary—which they obviously didn’t actually wish to join—ensuring they were rejected in order to establish clean standing to challenge the idea that party self-organization exists outside the government (this is why it’s illegal in the US for political parties to exist in the sense they’ve consistently existed in most other developed countries, ie with control over their own membership which they can use for discipline)
-Shelley v Kraemer: black families were intentionally “helped” (used) by lawfare/activist orgs to buy homes covered by racially restrictive covenants, which obviously excluded them, so they could sue
Griswold v Connecticut: To challenge a state ban on contraception, Estelle Griswold was used to open a birth control clinic with the explicit intention of being arrested
Etc etc etc. The story is in the 1st pic (it over-simplifies the development of cert a bit but overall is accurate), & some funny examples of how this invented LGBT lawfare in the other pics, & how this connects with Brown v Board in the quoted post, & other Warren Court examples in the comments
Charlie Kaufman movie about civil rights movement hijinks: commie spy / literal noble Jessica Mitford—at center of all the New Left stuff, including Hillary Clinton’s 1st law job—fraudulently hiring fake wives for black rapists to testify they’re innocent. “She really testified!”
Imagine one of his campy deepity meta movies about all this fakery being in some sense real. “Well we really did commit to the bit. We really did commit perjury. We really did fool the audience. & we really won. & isn’t that what really matters deep down?”
Open on aimless neurotic Jewish-ish guy, unlikable failure, obsessed with staging perfect hate hoaxes as an apolitical art form; loves to play the audience, gets ever more backing & success, but his producers keep him secret & think it’s about politics 😔
Good shorthand for EHC: as typically used, it refers to people who think in terms of credentials/institutions not IQ/focus/etc; implies all sorts of causes (eg androgynized agreeable conscientious neurotics) & effects (regulatory capture, ideological uniformity, midwit etiquette)
Some are pro-EHC bc they hate it when others believe officially low-status things (infowar slopulists, HBD autists, etc); others are pro-EHC bc they hate individual disagreeable passion—people who actually pursue personal goals instead of pointlessly suffering for certifications.
Some are anti-EHC bc they resent conformist cowardly smug midwits being superior to them (whether bc the midwits are actually *smarter* than them or bc theyre actually *dumber*); others are anti-EHC bc they just have projects that EHC etiquette/paperwork rituals get in the way of