Ceb K. Profile picture
Romanticism 2. Together through life
Jun 3 5 tweets 5 min read
Exactly 6 years ago—in response to someone dying in police custody while saying he couldn’t breathe—pretty much every public-facing business began aggressively posting negrolatrous race communism. Here are 4 random burger companies, below are similar for chicken, pizza, & coffee: Image
Image
Image
Image
Here are 4 big chicken companies posting simultaneously about how they actually wanna sell us on DEI even more than chicken. All of this on behalf of a worthless violent retarded career criminal from a privileged underperforming whiney caste overdosing & sparking costly riots etc Image
Image
Image
Image
Jun 2 4 tweets 2 min read
For decades now our governments, cultures, & communities have treated racism by whites as much worse than violence against whites. This has resulted in an endlessly ratcheting totalitarian system of speech & thought controls in defense of endlessly ratcheting anti-white violence. Image
Image
Given that right-wing expressions & opinions about race have been increasingly anathematized, as politics becomes increasingly about expressions & opinions about race, it makes sense to unapologetically support white riots in defense of white rights (esp to be racist) in response
May 30 4 tweets 3 min read
Soviet Spies & Fellow Travelers in the Wilson era: independent adventurous conspiracies of swashbuckling patricians

Under FDR there are way more—eg the Ware, Perlo, Silvermaster, & Halperin Spy Rings—but they’re all pathetic & boring: just following banal shrill flip-flop orders Image
Image
Image
Image
1920s commies: “well seeing as we’re all Groton Guys & Skull & Bones Boys who control Wall Street, let’s go in on industrializing the USSR as our futuristic slave plantation”

1940s commies: “Stalin said we like FDR & WWII now, & kick out CPUSA chief Browder for microaggressions”
May 30 8 tweets 7 min read
His family were all playboys who made fortunes on outright fraud & poured it all into spying for the Soviets & helping them build their slave system & donating enough to Republicans to control the “anti-communist” movement & bring down Nixon & get pardons for all their crimes. 👑 Image
Image
Image
Image
Short-run history’s driven by whatever gives ambitious disagreeable individualists runway to launch crazy passionate adventures. Since the French Rev, lefties (long-run dumb) are often better at that—see pics (Duc d’Orléans, Bakunin, Makhno, Averell & Pam Harriman) or thread. But Image
Image
Image
Image
May 24 5 tweets 2 min read
11 US states & our capital have lower white populations today than they did in 1960; 97 of the 100 most populous US cities in 2020 are less % white than they were in 1960 (& the other 3 didn’t exist in 1960); of the 50 most populous US cities in 1960, only 9 have more whites now. Image
Image
Image
Image
They ethnically cleansed us from our cities by unleashing savage primitives on us & banning us from fighting back & when we got away that was “white flight boo!!” & they’ve hated the suburbs ever since & we’re supposed to think their intentions were good & their thugs sympathetic
May 23 8 tweets 2 min read
In 2020 I began to remember that maybe the 1st news story I ever really followed was about Chinese town named something like Wuhan getting locked in by CCP & somehow winning. Mom ordered “midbrow” mags—Newsweek, Time—& as teen they reminded me of dentist waiting rooms (👩‍⚕️🤱🥵👍). Image Whenever I was bored & wanted to feel like nurses would imminently smother me with their breasts while going at my mouth I’d flip thru the naturally-sticky (cheap glossy) pages. Didn’t realize news was kayfabe so kept ominously telling people “something will happen in China soon”
May 22 4 tweets 2 min read
Today I’m practicing empathy. Our grandparents decided that terraforming the cosmos would be less impressive than negroforming the cities. Like teaching Clever Hans to “do math,” or Helen Keller to “write books.” This could be noble if we imagine them as autists with ant colonies Image
Image
Conspiracy theory: these groups—& plenty of others following the same pattern, from ACLU to SDS & many related terror cells, weird cults, welfare fraudsters, ethnic lobbyists, regulatory capturers etc—only seem so Jewish-ish bc they only care about Charlie Kaufmanning “the goyim”
May 18 4 tweets 3 min read
Have you ever wondered why suddenly when SCOTUS went crazy, all its crazy decisions were based on manufactured cases, which don’t really show up before then? eg:

-Loving v Virginia: RFK refers a guy in DC literally surnamed *Loving* to the ACLU so it can help him get intentionally arrested pretending to move back to Virginia with his wife, who already had a kid with another man when they got together when she was 17, so they can challenge anti-miscegenation laws with an easy pun that sympathetic journos & teachers will love

-Smith v Allwright: NAACP deliberately selected specific black voters in Texas to attempt to vote in the Democratic primary—which they obviously didn’t actually wish to join—ensuring they were rejected in order to establish clean standing to challenge the idea that party self-organization exists outside the government (this is why it’s illegal in the US for political parties to exist in the sense they’ve consistently existed in most other developed countries, ie with control over their own membership which they can use for discipline)

-Shelley v Kraemer: black families were intentionally “helped” (used) by lawfare/activist orgs to buy homes covered by racially restrictive covenants, which obviously excluded them, so they could sue

Griswold v Connecticut: To challenge a state ban on contraception, Estelle Griswold was used to open a birth control clinic with the explicit intention of being arrested

Etc etc etc. The story is in the 1st pic (it over-simplifies the development of cert a bit but overall is accurate), & some funny examples of how this invented LGBT lawfare in the other pics, & how this connects with Brown v Board in the quoted post, & other Warren Court examples in the commentsImage
Image
Image
Image
This intuitively ties into how the Warren Court started using fake social science in its fake activist cases to make up fake legal doctrines:

May 18 4 tweets 3 min read
Charlie Kaufman movie about civil rights movement hijinks: commie spy / literal noble Jessica Mitford—at center of all the New Left stuff, including Hillary Clinton’s 1st law job—fraudulently hiring fake wives for black rapists to testify they’re innocent. “She really testified!” Image
Image
Image
Image
Imagine one of his campy deepity meta movies about all this fakery being in some sense real. “Well we really did commit to the bit. We really did commit perjury. We really did fool the audience. & we really won. & isn’t that what really matters deep down?”
May 14 6 tweets 2 min read
Good shorthand for EHC: as typically used, it refers to people who think in terms of credentials/institutions not IQ/focus/etc; implies all sorts of causes (eg androgynized agreeable conscientious neurotics) & effects (regulatory capture, ideological uniformity, midwit etiquette) Some are pro-EHC bc they hate it when others believe officially low-status things (infowar slopulists, HBD autists, etc); others are pro-EHC bc they hate individual disagreeable passion—people who actually pursue personal goals instead of pointlessly suffering for certifications.
May 11 6 tweets 2 min read
Haven’t really TVed in years but listening to ep.s of Girls on 2X while doing busywork out of genderslop curiosity & find it interesting. eg the girls all just seem to hate each other & often say as much yet keep intimately hanging out. Nothing passes bechdel test, but feministly Its morality & worldview feel more intriguingly & relevantly alien than almost any scifi. Every scene vibrates with feelings of intense stakes & views, but nothing ever has any consequences & nobody thinks/talks/acts propositionally, & somehow this stakelessness is what spirals…
May 9 6 tweets 2 min read
AI is so smart it can prove stereotype threat real. Last night someone was thrilled to tell me that the reason blacks ruined St Louis is that whites were so mean & irrational that they expected blacks to ruin St Louis. It’s been an obviously retarded canard for 50 years, but now? I keep meeting “EHC” who bring up St Louis & get vicious teacher-pet glint when I clearly don’t neurotically pretend it’s fine, so they can proudly tell me that the only reason it’s not fine is eg “whites refugees stole their tax $ away from black thieves”
May 8 6 tweets 2 min read
Political curricula mostly just shape “dissidents”: normies tune it out but woke & based alike begin by neurotically doing the readings & saying “you aren’t living up to your stated standards—so I will”; then they loudly say that nobody says what everyone says but nobody believes For woke (women), this leads to institutional capture of care (ie women’s) work—where teachers assign books like “lies my teacher told me,” about how teachers told us that racism is bad but we then learned we can cow them by crying racism at anything they say even more stridently
May 3 4 tweets 2 min read
I asked an AI to estimate current gender gaps for issues that signify abundance politics—both big things like housing & energy development, & signals like stated breaks with wokeness & safetyism. Some bits are odd—eg I asked about “financialization” & it answered with crypto—but: Image Yes, masculine sociality is—like feminine sociality—prone to certain failure modes; but it alone is also prone to abundance. There has never been an abundance pilled feminine culture; there have been many abundance pilled masculine cultures. So if you favor abundance over safety-
Apr 25 4 tweets 4 min read
Foucault’s most famous book opens by contrasting unapologetic physical public punishment (spectacles of torture, mutilations & markings, bonded labor, deportations, etc) with correctional normative hidden discipline (locked away with your peers in facilities where nice teachers treat you like children & make you do all kinds of carefully scheduled collective busywork so you can adhere to their moralist norms).

This domestication wouldn’t even be necessarily bad if it was just about feminizing criminals; but of course it can’t stop there, because it’s about rebranding souls rather than branding bodies, & thus about finding excuses to forget about what was actually done so you can instead harp on about whether one’s performative intentions have been reformed, & so the devouring mother grants endless preening sympathy to the most underhanded & manipulative, & punishes those who are forthright & independent.

What a coincidence that the first notable gay philosopher after modern feminization began was the trailblazer who devoted his career to noticing that all of life is increasingly about filling up time with scheduled busywork, about putting judgy labels on judged affects rather than putting material costs on costly acts, about making the process of judgment ever more public & the practice of punishment ever more hidden, about reducing the political sphere to ever bloating domestic matters & reducing thumotic matters to the ever shrinking private sphere, & so forth.Image
Image
Image
Image
Yes—prisons precede modern feminization, but a) they basically came from Quakers (the wokes of their day) & b) their emphasis on organized busywork & emotional reflection for their own sake as ways to maternally blank all slates is clearly proto-feminizing
Apr 22 6 tweets 2 min read
The group that doxed @Howlingmutant0 are threatening to dox many other big anons & it’s obvious even from their own telling that they got his info by unlawfully looking at credit card hacks of s*bst*ck then parallel constructing the goodreads claim. They should be prosecuted too. In their own thread on it they claim they got him by finding a post from 2020 where he said he read a popular book, then finding a goodreads rating (not review) of that book by his real name—even tho goodreads ratings aren’t searchable—& then “confirming” his ID using two hacks…
Apr 21 10 tweets 20 min read
In zombie stories, the worldviews that are fleshed out are those of mad scientists, fifth columnists, useful idiots, resentful cowards, etc, rather than those of the zombies themselves. eg the French Revolution contained intellectual multitudes, but eg the Cuban one was intellectually contained by its western spectators. Thus the relevant ideologies behind third worldism aren’t explained or inspired by the ravings of Qutb or Fanon, but rather by non third worldist attempts at riding third worldism like a tiger. Many good germane bits of this forum post [rest is by graveler, not me]:

Wanted to lay out my current thoughts on migration, the number one issue of our day.

The “quantity has a quality all its own” observation has been made elsewhere. I don’t need to make it again. Yes, the fact that there are many foreign individuals we might gladly and profitably welcome into our midst does not scale up to open borders being a good idea. The Great Replacement is obviously real, come on, if you aren’t allowed to say it you live under a tyranny. The Camp of the Saints. The Second Bantu Expansion. These things are all true and I'm opposed.

I want to introduce two terms, which I have used before without specificity. The first of these is alienism. Alienism is a moral philosophy, the content of which is that foreigners are better than non-foreigners. The only other person I have seen use variants of this word (“alienist”) is substack titan arctotherium, although I don’t think he’s defined it. I’m defining it now. Alienism: foreigners are better than us. Migrationism is the use of mass migration as the foundation of political power. After I've defined it, I'll give my understanding of how migrationism in particular evolved into its current, dominating form.

Alienism

Alienism is a very strange concept and so deserves some elaboration. I would distinguish it from racial hatred or ethnic resentment (including the anti-white variety) since it is general rather than particular. It is also not a form of racial supremacism as the category of morally superior individuals under the alienist framework is not, by any objective measure, a racial or ethnic one, and won’t be any time soon. It is also distinct from Third Worldism, again a more particular ideology and moral system. More subtly, it is not the same thing as xenophilia or cosmopolitanism, which aside from being largely personality dispositions and social arrangements respectively do not inherently come to the same moral conclusions as alienism. The xenophile may like foreign ways or even prefer them to his own without ascribing a larger moral valence to this preference. To use myself as an example, I think the Arab custom of always ensuring that you do anything dirty with your left hand is an improvement over the “no preference” of my own culture but I don’t think this makes Arabs better than me. Likewise, a cosmopolitan individual ought to have no better opinion of some exotically-located rube than of his own local variety. Of course in practice alienism is often comorbid with these other things. Alienism is also retarded and makes its adherents unable to notice things like being the subject of racial antipathy.

In fact, it’s so retarded that I need to defend even the claim that it exists. As a moral philosophy, it comes in harder and softer forms, with the most hardcore variants mostly held by sophists or deranged ideologues. As a 21st century philosophy, it is often conceived and defended in economic terms. A few illustrative examples.

This scene from “The Grand Budapest Hotel”, which of course is enthusiastically praised by deranged alienist ideologue Bryan Caplan.

[continued in next post]Image Softer forms of alienism often involve claims of the economic superiority of foreigners over your people. They are “hard-working” and “family-oriented”. Where alienists hold significant legal power, it may actually be illegal to ascribe negative characteristics to foreigners, even on an individual level. If a foreigner is paid a lower wage for a job than your people, this is evidence that they are harder-working than your people. If they will work for the same wage, it is evidence that they are at least as good as your people. And of course if they are paid a higher wage, it is evidence that they are not only harder-working but smarter or grittier or more driven than your people.

Alienism is why Appeals To Net Taxpayer doesn’t work. “It takes nine working-age white men to support one Somali before you include the keedz” no shit, why do you think white people are even still allowed to use the Internet? What you should really be upset about [effective altruist voice] is how much Tax Money isn’t going to foreigners and instead is being wasted on non-basic cars, houses in areas that aren't full of foreigners, privately-held capital, and other frivolities. If you enter derangeoid territory you can even find this case made for crime. Better for foreign criminals to victimize our people than to commit their misdeeds where foreigners would be harmed.

Perhaps the most common alienist belief is that a foreigner’s relocating to the alienist’s country ipso facto demonstrates good moral character, and they may not even be shy in crowing about the supposed eugenic qualities of immigrants qua the mere act of immigration. This is, I think, basically a bastardization of more careful arguments made by Gregory Clark and Garett Jones. I once listened to an Immortal Technique song which sampled Al Sharpton making this argument about African-Americans “surviving the Middle Passage”. I want to emphasize that migration in one direction or another may or may not select for positive traits and this must be determined on a case-by-case basis; an alienist sees no need to examine specific cases. Even Al Sharpton’s sermon was not alienist because it referred to a specific event rather than to migration in general.

Alienism primarily serves as, and I hypothesize was created as, a fallback ideological screen for the employment of migration as a tool of political power. A fallback, because migrationists seem to rely on more particular justifications like “worker shortage” or “human rights” but, if these fail, will simply make brute alienist appeals to entitlement. Migrationism: another word I made up. Migrationism is the foundation of state power on mass migration – the movement of large numbers of people.

Migrationism

Migration as a tool of government isn’t new – there is the ancient example of the Exile of the Hebrews, the settlement of the New World, the various deportations of the mid-20th century. What makes migrationism new is the propensity of certain modern states to resort to migration as a foundational tool of governance. Migrationists prefer to gain and maintain power via migration in contrast to fiscal and monetary policy, violence, public works, trade, scientific advancement, legislation, propaganda, or any other means you could name. The most trivial reason for this development is technical: it’s easier for people to move around at scale thanks to a combination of communication and air travel: these enable faster coordination and action than ever before.

Then again, it’s also easier to move to Somalia or Liechtenstein than ever before, and yet curiously no one does. I believe that Western political classes – those with the means to influence and direct state policy – only discovered the usefulness of migration and thence became migrationist fairly late in the 20th century, certainly at least a generation post-1945.

[again continued in next post]
Apr 4 5 tweets 5 min read
What does our charity buy us? Let me tell you about one particular “skid row activist” in LA who’s received grants from countless activist fronts for big public & private slush funds, on top of all kinds of welfare & free health consumption, & who regularly grifts donations too… Image
Image
Image
Image
You can spot her at any LA protest for the homeless, trans, black, etc, going back years. She’s received grants etc from countless activist fronts for huge city, state, federal, & private slush funds (her site is 1 irate sexual post & a list of “partners”)
Image
Image
Image
Image
Apr 2 5 tweets 3 min read
I’ve met a dozen reasonable youngish white collar guys from St Louis & gingerly tried mentioning how apocalyptically that city’s been ruined. Most seem surprised, & if they accept that population collapsed (from ~900,000 in the 1950s to ~275,000 today), & that its homicide rate has—especially since it invented BLM in 2014—been among the worst in the world, & that eg the nice-ish big-ish ruins of its downtown are abandoned even during nice Friday afternoons, then they immediately leap to “haha yeah that’s because corrupt urban planners did slum clearance (???) to build the big arch.” They don’t even seem to realize how absurd their narrative is—that the downtown is abandoned & surrounded by slums now bc back when St Louis was at its peak an area nearby was very efficiently turned into an incredible monument which is now downtown’s only draw—but it feels as though they feel as though they’re being honest, because to them the shibboleths of our negrolatrous regime are far more binding than the black criminality it covers for, which they left behind. South Africanization has already happened, it’s just not yet evenly distributed, & you will never wake up natural elites by telling them to feel victimized by natural slaves; but if you give them something positive & active to direct their etiquette towards, then they can stop just rhetorically & politically punching down on the white kulaks whom they get their feral blacks to physically punch down on.Image
Image
Image
Image
Admittedly the “slum clearance to build the arch” narrative is common local dogma: in the 1930s, machine politicians rigged a bond vote to get federal money to tear down some old waterfront buildings, & used it as bland park / parking lot for 20 years, then built arch in 2 years. Image
Mar 25 4 tweets 2 min read
“Let’s now collectively shame these healthy young men with guns for being young men with guns. This is the only way that we—the femme, old, weak, obese, gay, etc—maintain our smothering rule by social shaming. Act like it’s obvious they’re beneath us. Catty inertia’s all we have” The key determinant of TFR is young men’s relative status: when they have more, they’re more productively attractive to fertile women; when women have more degrees, money, & status than men—via unproductive wokery—we die out. Young men should be *feared.*

Mar 18 17 tweets 7 min read
Jessica Mitford helped the Communist Party produce an entirely fake wife for a black rapist on death row, to testify to his innocence. This was one of the key triggers of the civil rights movement, along with equally fake CPUSA pro-rape activism like the Scottsboro Boys case etc. Image
Image
She was born to the nobility, stole daddy’s money to run away with Churchill’s nephew to fight for the commies in the Spanish Civil War, then married the head of perhaps the most important communist labor law firm in the US, & worked on countless retarded commie projects for him. Image
Image