Thread by @zei_squirrel

BREAKING: The New York Times claimed extensive "visual evidence" of "targeted genital mutilation" and "inserting of objects [knives and nails] into vaginas" as part of its "mass rape" hoax. This was definitively debunked by the UN report, stating there is no such visual evidence

the claim of extensive "visual evidence" with repeated statements of "We saw a photo of cut up vaginas, nails in vaginas, knives in vaginas" is strewn throughout the original Gettleman, Sella, Schwartz hoax to browbeat the reader into submission. But it was all a contrived facade

the claim of "nails/knives in vaginas" is the most lurid part of the "mass rape" hoax that is constantly repeated even after its debunking. Its primary source is of course a Zaka hoaxer, Simcha Greinman. The NYT piece from December 4 begins with his tale of that disgusting lie

the NYT loves this particular fabrication, because it is aimed at terrorizing the reader into submission. The intention is to make you go: "Oh my god. Ok, I submit. I accept the entire hoax now, and do with Gaza what you will." Here is Jill Filipovic laundering it in the NYT:

so there are at least 3 separate articles in the New York Times right now, two of them not opinion but "journalism" pieces having the names of Jeffrey Gettleman, Adam Sella and Anat Schwartz on them, repeating a proven, debunked lie. But the NYT says: We still stand by it all

in fact it's much worse. The NYT let one of them, Adam Sella the food blogger, write pieces on the UN report that definitively debunks their own claims of "extensive visual evidence" of "targeted gender mutilation". It can't get more shameless than this

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1765186263617884244

it wasn't just the NYT who repeatedly laundered this lurid fantasy atrocity propaganda hoax of "knives and nails inserted into vaginas". The Guardian's Bethan McKernan, who produced the most deranged version of the "mass rape" hoax, of course also laundered it:

I say The Guardian's Bethan McKernan, who blocked me because I exposed her for the genocidal propagandist maniac she is, produced the most deranged version of the hoax because she also laundered tortured forced "confessions" and claims of "video footage":

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1773779105277788291

who else in Western media repeated this definitively debunked claim of "knives inserted into vaginas"? The BBC. And notice who they cite for it. It's no longer the NYT/Guardian Zaka hoaxer Simcha Greinman, but another one. He even adds that "their internal organs were removed"

do you know who actually removed internal organs of girls? US troops did. And instead of it being a deranged figment of a Zaka pedophile rape cultist's imagination, it's a proven fact by direct testimony from US troops themselves. Genocidal projection

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1717128105322565847

now this is a serious problem for the New York Times. They have three articles, two of them "journalistic" pieces, where it has provably false claims of visual evidence of a systematic pattern of gender mutilation. The UN report confirmed that. Where is the retraction @nytimes?

it's an indisputable fact that Jeffrey Gettleman, Adam Sella, Anat Schwartz, Katherine Rosman, Lisa Lerer and Jill Filipovic printed false statements in the pages of the New York Times, and Bethan McKernan in The Guardian. Same with Kingsley and Bergman:

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1773614876759400740

minimal journalistic integrity and ethics demands a retraction and correction of all those pieces, and at a minimum the firing of Jeffrey Gettleman, Adam Sella, Anat Schwartz and Bethan McKernan, who have violated every basic standard of journalism intentionally and repeatedly

an important point: The NYT and other outlets don't actually expect anyone to read the UN report they keep citing as being authoritative, like in that recent Amit Soussana piece, with the pretense that it confirms rather than debunks their "mass rape" hoax

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1767151841958129877

but I actually read the report carefully, and as detailed in the thread below, the report decisively debunks the maximalist version of the "mass rape" hoax fabricated by the NYT and Guardian. The "we have reviewed extensive visual evidence" claim is a lie

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1764771314600952192

to this day when the NYT is forced to defend its original Gettleman, Sella, Schwartz hoax, they immediately go back to "there was extensive visual evidence! Did you not see the part about the nails in the genitalia? The cuts? DID YOU NOT SEE THE CUTS!"

that's a lie. They lied

as I showed, the report says conclusively that there is no visual evidence of a pattern of genital mutilation, not of the soldiers, not of the civilians, of no one. They looked at all the same photos and videos the NYT claimed showed this. That is false. It is debunked. They lied

what is the New York Times now going to do? Just ignore that their much vaunted "Screams Without Words" piece makes claims about "visual evidence of genital mutilation" that is false? Or will they add another absurd deranged update like this months later:

https://twitter.com/zei_squirrel/status/1772365659160068456