Over the last two days it has ben so disheartening to have to convince multiple pastors, defending another pastor, that "jokes" from the pulpit about how women should essentially be sex blow up dolls for their husbands is not okay.
It has been AMAZING how many people have seen the problem. The fact that the video went so viral, and continues to be talked about, shows that most people see this as a huge, glaring issue.
And the fact that so many have seen it, and called it out themselves, has been so encouraging.
I've had so many notes from women who have been hurt by the church, feeling seen. To have that hurt validated is healing.
Thankfully, I have had relatively few people push back.
But most of those who have are also pastors.
That's not a good look.
And I have made the mistake of trying to make my case, as if it's possible to find just the right words to convince them that "jokes" about women's lack of sexual autonomy are not actually funny.
I'm going to stop arguing now. It's too emotionally draining to have to explain why normalizing a pornified view of women and sex from the pulpit is bad.
Honestly, if you don't just see that, I doubt I could convince you.
If you think Jesus is okay with this? Just, wow.
Now I'm going to go think about Easter, and remember how women flocked to Jesus, felt seen by Jesus, and stayed loyal to Jesus.
Because He saw them. He loved them. He treated them with dignity.
Please, pastors, I beseech you. Be like Jesus.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Over the weekend, a number of people fighting against misogyny in evangelicalism felt quite discouraged, as did I, when the conversation shifted from calling out bad behaviour to asking people to stop piling on pastors who did something wrong.
A few thoughts:
It is natural and good to feel sympathy when we see someone go through intense online criticism--even if we think the criticism is just. We simply must see the humanity in others.
But there is also a difference between being piled on unjustly and being piled on for being unjust.
From the outside it can look the same--someone's words are being disparaged, and their reputation is at risk. But not all disparagement is unwarranted. Suffering for doing good is one thing; reaping the consequences of bad behavior is another.
Josh Howerton has made a statement saying I took him out of context and it was "just a joke."
I have no problem giving the whole context and talking about this more, so let's play the entire clip and break it down, shall we?
Here is the entire clip. I didn't play the whole thing yesterday for the sake of keeping things short and sweet, but on Instagram, so far about 90% of people are saying the whole clip makes things so much worse.
Here's the transcript. Let's note a few things: First, he framed this as "gold piece of marriage advice." He ends the session by saying that this was all free. It is not framed as a joke.
Could it be that many men who have risen to the top of evangelical institutions just wouldn't be that impressive anywhere else?
A 🧵.
I've been thinking about two incidents lately: Al Mohler's comments about apparent sex abuser Paul Pressler (throwing shade on the accusations saying, "he had a lot of enemies"), and Bart Barber's "joke" at the expense of sexual abuse survivors.
Something has occurred to me.
Many men high up in evangelical institutions have spent their lives in the evangelical world. They went to evangelical colleges & seminaries. They pastored churches. They served on boards of parachurch organizations.
And all of this took place in an evangelical bubble.
I've seen an uptick of attacks on the findings from our survey of 20,000 women for The Great Sex Rescue lately, and I'd like to address it.
🧵
First, the attacks on our research: when people critique the sample size--we "only" had 20,000 women--I know the critique isn't serious. The vast majority of peer reviewed articles have sample sizes of 1000 respondents or less.
For instance, the peer reviewed study frequently quoted by evangelicals that 75% of women who file for divorce claim lack of commitment as the main cause? It had just 52 people in it.
Obligation sex was the worst belief that we measured in our survey of 20,000 women for The Great Sex Rescue.
A 🧵on what it does to our bodies:
When she believes the obligation sex message before she’s married, her chance of sexual pain increases to almost the same statistical effect as if she had been abused, because the body interprets obligation sex as trauma.
The obligation sex message--that men are entitled to sex and women must provide it--also morphs into marital rape and coercion.
But even outside of coercion--even when she internalizes the message, and he doesn't believe it--it still affects women's bodies.
I heard from a woman today who is married to an amazing man--but still felt like she wasn't supposed to voice an opinion.
In pre-marital counseling, they were taught that he was her "head." That God appointed him to lead her.
So when she disagreed, she felt like she wasn't allowed to speak up. So she stopped.
Within about 5 years there was such distance between them. She felt like he didn't know her--but also that she had become a shell of herself. She stopped asking herself what she thought.
He noticed but he didn't realize the dynamic that was happening.
She finally went to counseling, and the therapist told her to talk to her husband. She did. He had no idea. He told her he WANTED to know what she thought.
It's now been 5 more years, and she's slowly untangling.