In today's edition of "libertarians are ridiculous people," we examine noted crank Ammon Bundy. After going on the run from police, Bellingcat geolocated him to (are you sitting down?) Utah.
I wouldn't normally comment, only the self-awareness issues on display are astounding🧵
For those unfamiliar with him, Bundy espouses an apocalyptic ideology which sees divine providence in, of all things, the rather famously-secular U.S. Constitution.
By amazing coincidence, the one place in the world divined by God to spawn the Kingdom of Heaven is the very country in which Bundy himself happens to live.
Bundy adheres to a libertarian philosophy which demands he live in complete freedom and autonomy from the state, except it has to be in a highly-complex political economy which somehow produces an abundant supply of flannel shirts at a reasonable price.
Among the many things from which Bundy is on the run, one is a $50m defamation judgment resulting from a campaign of harassment against a hospital after Bundy, as one does, accused it of complicity in child trafficking.
The hospital had the temerity to take custody of a literal baby after the pernicious U.S. government discovered the child to be extremely malnourished. As any reasonable person would agree, every baby has a god-given right to starve himself if he damn-well pleases.
Anyway, about ten years ago, Bundy got into some trouble after launching a rebellion against the government to defend his right to [checks notes] enjoy special state subsidies for himself that nobody else can obtain.
[taps sign]
After getting off with the absurdly lenient punishment of community service, Bundy decided, no, he would not agree to provide this modest service to the community and tried to substitute the hours he had spent on his own personal thing to see if that would count.
Credit to Bellingcat for geolocating Bundy, who is apparently unaware of what the internet is, after the guy posted a bunch of videos proudly displaying clues giving away his precise location. Who'da thunk that filming a video driving the suburbs in your truck would expose you?
Now that it looks like the law may finally catch up to him, let us pray that others might someday follow in Bundy's proud footsteps and violently rebel against the government to defend our right to get free shit.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My latest: No other modern-day autocrat has tried to destroy democracy as quickly as Trump. But there’s a good reason for that: It’s stupid.
The combination of Trump’s recklessness and the strength of US civil society will eventually lead to a showdown, one he’s going to lose.🧵
Trump's breakneck bid for authoritarianism has shocked even experts on the subject. He has seized congressional authority, defied the judiciary, and weaponized the state against everything and everyone. Now, he's unleashed the army against protesters.
Attempting to dismantle democracy in such a short span of time would provoke backlash anywhere. In the US, of all places, it is downright reckless. Compared to other countries that succumbed to authoritarianism, America’s civil society is unmatched in its capacity to resist.
As bad as things are now, we have not begun to see what Trump’s authoritarian regime is capable of. That’s because the traditional checks on presidential power have vanished. Before we consider how to get out of this, we must first understand how we got here. 🧵
Last time, we examined the evidence that the U.S. has transitioned to a competitive authoritarian regime. Authoritarianism is not a threat on the horizon; it is already here. This changes everything in terms of how Trump can be stopped.
Today, I identify the guardrails that once served to check the president’s abuse of power. I also show how each one of those guardrails had vanished by the time Trump was sworn in this year. The story begins long before he was on anyone’s political radar.
First of all, credit to @ItsArtoir for publishing the emails above.
@ItsArtoir The context: Hacked emails show that @wyattreed13, “managing editor” of The Grayzone News (whatever the hell that means), accepted monthly payments from PressTV, an Iranian state-run outlet known for hosting forced-confessions of dissidents right before their executions.
Lost amidst the interminable calls for “peace” is that an agreement to end the war is likely impossible. Neither the fervent wishcasting of Western pundits nor even, if they were so inclined, the very parties involved, can make it happen. In my latest, I explain why. 🧵
As always, you can find the link at the end of the thread or in my bio.
Writing articles and op-eds in support of a negotiated settlement has become a favorite pastime of the Western literati. Nary a day passes by without some pundit or academic, few of whom have any regional expertise, penning yet another iteration of this tired argument.
Want to see a progressive sound off about “spheres of influence” like they’re Otto von Bismarck? Beseech the great powers to divide up smaller nations over cigars and brandy? Parrot the inane rationales of a genocidal empire? It’s easy! Just bring up Ukraine.
My latest 🧵
Russia’s war on Ukraine has all the ingredients to turn a certain gullible progressive bad. It prompted global condemnation. The perpetrator’s a longtime enemy of the U.S. and a victim an ally. So it’s practically tailor-made to arouse the skepticism of contrarian leftists.
But understanding why requires one to enter into this peculiar mindset. That’s what I aim to do here. I dig into the foundational—and very weird—beliefs that end up causing many progressives to justify autocratic imperialism and indulge in silly atrocity-denial.
A lot of scholars are seemingly hellbent on damaging their reputations with ruinous advice on Ukraine and Russia. The past week alone has seen three open letters from this sorry genre, all of which, if carried out, would put real people’s lives in danger. Let’s take a look.🧵
As always, you can find the link at the end of this thread or in my bio.
The first two letters are calls for a negotiated settlement between Russia and Ukraine. One of them—I kid you not—was drafted by a guy who was suspended from the UK’s House of Lords for his undisclosed financial ties to the Kremlin.