In today's edition of "libertarians are ridiculous people," we examine noted crank Ammon Bundy. After going on the run from police, Bellingcat geolocated him to (are you sitting down?) Utah.
I wouldn't normally comment, only the self-awareness issues on display are astounding🧵
For those unfamiliar with him, Bundy espouses an apocalyptic ideology which sees divine providence in, of all things, the rather famously-secular U.S. Constitution.
By amazing coincidence, the one place in the world divined by God to spawn the Kingdom of Heaven is the very country in which Bundy himself happens to live.
Bundy adheres to a libertarian philosophy which demands he live in complete freedom and autonomy from the state, except it has to be in a highly-complex political economy which somehow produces an abundant supply of flannel shirts at a reasonable price.
Among the many things from which Bundy is on the run, one is a $50m defamation judgment resulting from a campaign of harassment against a hospital after Bundy, as one does, accused it of complicity in child trafficking.
The hospital had the temerity to take custody of a literal baby after the pernicious U.S. government discovered the child to be extremely malnourished. As any reasonable person would agree, every baby has a god-given right to starve himself if he damn-well pleases.
Anyway, about ten years ago, Bundy got into some trouble after launching a rebellion against the government to defend his right to [checks notes] enjoy special state subsidies for himself that nobody else can obtain.
[taps sign]
After getting off with the absurdly lenient punishment of community service, Bundy decided, no, he would not agree to provide this modest service to the community and tried to substitute the hours he had spent on his own personal thing to see if that would count.
Credit to Bellingcat for geolocating Bundy, who is apparently unaware of what the internet is, after the guy posted a bunch of videos proudly displaying clues giving away his precise location. Who'da thunk that filming a video driving the suburbs in your truck would expose you?
Now that it looks like the law may finally catch up to him, let us pray that others might someday follow in Bundy's proud footsteps and violently rebel against the government to defend our right to get free shit.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lost amidst the interminable calls for “peace” is that an agreement to end the war is likely impossible. Neither the fervent wishcasting of Western pundits nor even, if they were so inclined, the very parties involved, can make it happen. In my latest, I explain why. 🧵
As always, you can find the link at the end of the thread or in my bio.
Writing articles and op-eds in support of a negotiated settlement has become a favorite pastime of the Western literati. Nary a day passes by without some pundit or academic, few of whom have any regional expertise, penning yet another iteration of this tired argument.
Want to see a progressive sound off about “spheres of influence” like they’re Otto von Bismarck? Beseech the great powers to divide up smaller nations over cigars and brandy? Parrot the inane rationales of a genocidal empire? It’s easy! Just bring up Ukraine.
My latest 🧵
Russia’s war on Ukraine has all the ingredients to turn a certain gullible progressive bad. It prompted global condemnation. The perpetrator’s a longtime enemy of the U.S. and a victim an ally. So it’s practically tailor-made to arouse the skepticism of contrarian leftists.
But understanding why requires one to enter into this peculiar mindset. That’s what I aim to do here. I dig into the foundational—and very weird—beliefs that end up causing many progressives to justify autocratic imperialism and indulge in silly atrocity-denial.
A lot of scholars are seemingly hellbent on damaging their reputations with ruinous advice on Ukraine and Russia. The past week alone has seen three open letters from this sorry genre, all of which, if carried out, would put real people’s lives in danger. Let’s take a look.🧵
As always, you can find the link at the end of this thread or in my bio.
The first two letters are calls for a negotiated settlement between Russia and Ukraine. One of them—I kid you not—was drafted by a guy who was suspended from the UK’s House of Lords for his undisclosed financial ties to the Kremlin.
“The sooner peace is negotiated the more lives will be saved…”
Anyone who says this—and it is stunning how many do—immediately discredits themselves. What on earth do these people think will happen to the millions of Ukrainians trapped under permanent Russian occupation??? 🧵
The vast majority of Ukrainians reject a territorial partition with Russia, and there is a very, very good reason for that. Far from having their lives saved, they will experience mass killing, filtration camps, deportations, arbitrary arrest, torture, and sexual violence.
And yet here these assholes go writing open letters to the Financial Times and pretending to have the best interests of Ukrainians in mind. Yet what they are proposing will consign Ukrainians to permanent violence under Russian occupation. I am so sick of this bullshit.
Humanity nowadays seems to be divided into two groups: Those accusing others of antisemitism, and those denying the people so accused are antisemitic. Only it’s a complete train wreck, as no one’s defining what they mean by the term. Fret not, for I am here to help.
My latest:🧵
As always, you can find the link to the piece at the end of this thread or in my bio.
When we do see a definition of antisemitism, the one that’s cited most often happens to be terrible—terrible not just in comparison to other definitions of the term, but, like, world-historical terrible, as in one of the worst definitions ever conceived for any word, ever.
Russia has waged many wars since 1991. Only this one is genocidal. Thus arises the obvious question: Why? What makes Ukraine different?
In my latest for The Detox, I offer an answer. 🧵
Before I start, here is where you can find the piece:
Not all experts agree that Russia is carrying out a genocide, even if the majority of them do. Nevertheless, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the only one since 1991 which has so much as elicited such accusations from mainstream experts.