In today's edition of "libertarians are ridiculous people," we examine noted crank Ammon Bundy. After going on the run from police, Bellingcat geolocated him to (are you sitting down?) Utah.
I wouldn't normally comment, only the self-awareness issues on display are astounding🧵
For those unfamiliar with him, Bundy espouses an apocalyptic ideology which sees divine providence in, of all things, the rather famously-secular U.S. Constitution.
By amazing coincidence, the one place in the world divined by God to spawn the Kingdom of Heaven is the very country in which Bundy himself happens to live.
Bundy adheres to a libertarian philosophy which demands he live in complete freedom and autonomy from the state, except it has to be in a highly-complex political economy which somehow produces an abundant supply of flannel shirts at a reasonable price.
Among the many things from which Bundy is on the run, one is a $50m defamation judgment resulting from a campaign of harassment against a hospital after Bundy, as one does, accused it of complicity in child trafficking.
The hospital had the temerity to take custody of a literal baby after the pernicious U.S. government discovered the child to be extremely malnourished. As any reasonable person would agree, every baby has a god-given right to starve himself if he damn-well pleases.
Anyway, about ten years ago, Bundy got into some trouble after launching a rebellion against the government to defend his right to [checks notes] enjoy special state subsidies for himself that nobody else can obtain.
[taps sign]
After getting off with the absurdly lenient punishment of community service, Bundy decided, no, he would not agree to provide this modest service to the community and tried to substitute the hours he had spent on his own personal thing to see if that would count.
Credit to Bellingcat for geolocating Bundy, who is apparently unaware of what the internet is, after the guy posted a bunch of videos proudly displaying clues giving away his precise location. Who'da thunk that filming a video driving the suburbs in your truck would expose you?
Now that it looks like the law may finally catch up to him, let us pray that others might someday follow in Bundy's proud footsteps and violently rebel against the government to defend our right to get free shit.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russia has waged many wars since 1991. Only this one is genocidal. Thus arises the obvious question: Why? What makes Ukraine different?
In my latest for The Detox, I offer an answer. 🧵
Before I start, here is where you can find the piece:
Not all experts agree that Russia is carrying out a genocide, even if the majority of them do. Nevertheless, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the only one since 1991 which has so much as elicited such accusations from mainstream experts.
Russia’s war on Ukraine is notable in that there’s really no moral ambiguity involved. At all. So if your goal is to introduce any moral complexity into it, the only way to do it is by making up a bunch of shit that never happened.🧵
Here's the problem with b.s. like this. Even if you buy the claims of Assad apologists that a few of the alleged attacks were false flags, you're still left with literally hundreds of documented chemical attacks which none of these people have ever so much as questioned. 🧵
An NGO called GPPi has compiled the most comprehensive dataset I've managed to find on chemical weapons attacks in the Syrian civil war. The methodology is extremely rigorous.
Using open-source methods, GPPi has documented, as of 2020, 334 instances in which Assad's regime allegedly used chemical weapons. You can find it here:
The commonality between Palestine and Ukraine isn’t war; it is occupation. The difference is that Palestinians mostly lack the ability to resist—hence the call for a ceasefire. Ukrainians still have it—hence the rejection of a ceasefire. The goal is to get the occupier out.🧵
“You can’t compare the two cases,” many say, “they’re different.” Yes, they obviously are. Still, in this one fundamental respect—a state trying to violently subjugate an unwilling population—they are the same.
But instead of recognizing the link between Palestine and Ukraine, most commentators I see tend to be confused, whether consciously or not. The fact remains, though, that opposing occupation in one case while accepting it in the other *makes no sense.*
Now that our old friend is back with a fresh "Maidan coup" take, it is worth reviewing just how dumb this argument is. It's not only that the general argument is dumb; in fact, every single permutation of its various strands is just mind-numbingly stupid. Let's take a look.🧵
Let's start with the new NYT article. "Why," Maté asks, "was Ukraine's new spy chief already on such good terms with the CIA and MI6, literally on the night of" this supposed coup?
Naturally, Maté is assuming you're not actually gonna look up the article, because if you did, you'd see that it contains quite a lot of information that debunks his contention that the CIA was "already on such good terms" with Ukraine's new spy chief.
So after proudly leading the charge to oust Claudine Gay over alleged plagiarism, @BillAckman finds himself defending his academic wife against the same charges. Below, I’ve compiled a short thread of examples of Ackman invoking his natural right to hypocrisy. Enjoy! 🧵
First, some context. As you’ll see, Ackman’s wife is basically accused of the same type of sloppy citation as Gay; only his wife’s case, the conduct appears to be more extensive and considerably more egregious: