Aizenberg Profile picture
Apr 1, 2024 • 16 tweets • 5 min read • Read on X
🧵Is Jordan part of “Historic Palestine”? This has been going around X recently. Answer is yes; historically & geographically both sides of the Jordan River have always been considered part of Palestine, a fact often obscured today. Detailed history thread worth your time: 1/16
Palestine as an entity first emerged as a Roman province following crushing of Jewish revolt ~135CE. Romans renamed Judea to Provincia Syria Palaestina in part to erase Jewish culture in the region. The original “Palestine” included both sides of the Jordan River, see map: 2/Image
Later in Roman/Byzantine era, area was split into Palaestina Prima, Secunda & Tertia (I, II & III) covering both sides of Jordan River. In fact capital of Palaestina III was in Petra, Jordan. So again, "Historic Palestine" included Jordan (centuries before Islam was born.) 3/Image
In the early 7th century Islam emerged in Arabia and Muslim armies conquered large portions of the Middle East, including the three Byzantine “Palaestinas” circa 636CE. The Muslim conquerors roughly maintained the Roman-Byzantine divisions of the region as provinces. 4/
Palaestina I became mostly “Jund Filastin” (Jund=military district) with capital in Ramla NOT Jerusalem, which is telling; Palaestina II became “Jund Al-Urdunn” and Palaestina III became part of Jund Dimashq. Once again, Jund Filastin included both sides of the Jordan River. 5/Image
Jund districts that were part of Muslim Caliphates remained in place until Crusader conquest in 1099CE when the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem was formed, which also included both sides of the Jordan River. Borders shifted with ongoing wars over the years, see representative map: 6/ Image
The Christians were fully expelled from the region in the 13th century and area came under Muslim Mamluk control; they did not name any province or region “Palestine”; no entity would be called Palestine for the next 800 years, until the British revived the name post WWI. 7/
Circa 1516 the Ottoman Turks displaced the Mamluks and much of Middle East came under Muslim Turk rule until 1917. Turks divided their empire into provinces called Eyalets then Vilayets; none were ever called Palestine, a centuries old name associated with Rome. See 1903 map: 8/ Image
After WWI, British & French split the Middle East. British were granted "Mandate for Palestine" at San Remo in April 1920. This territory included all of today's Israel, Jordan, WB & Gaza. So the revived “Palestine” matched ancient Palestine on both sides of the Jordan River. 9/ Image
However in April 1921, for reasons beyond scope of this thread, British divided Palestine Mandate, taking 78% to form “Transjordan” as a British protectorate. In 1946 “Jordan” gained independence. Since then many pretend that Jordan was never an integral part of “Palestine.” 10/
The artificial British creation of Jordan in 1921 does not change the fact that for 1,800 years prior, "Palestine," in every manifestation, included territory on both sides of the Jordan River. Ethnically and geographically, both sides of the river were the same. 11/
Many point to maps of “Palestine” printed in European & American atlases in 19th-early 20th century (see example) as “proof” that Palestine existed as a political entity at the time, but this is false, revealing a misunderstanding of what these maps actually represented. 12/ Image
Atlases at the time included “Palestine” due to its connection to Land of Jesus. It was thus required to depict this Roman era Palestine in a modern Atlas. It had no connection to actual political borders as no entity known as Palestine existed in 400 years of Ottoman rule. 13/
Importantly to our question, all depictions of “Palestine” by Western atlases inluded both sides of the Jordan River. The British “Palestine Exploration Fund,” founded in 1865, surveyed both Western and Eastern Palestine (see map below) – Eastern meaning today’s Jordan. 14/ Image
So is Jordan part of “Historic Palestine”? Yes. As a Roman & Muslim province from ~136CE-1099CE Palestine included both sides of Jordan River. As did the original British Palestine Mandate & maps of Palestine in atlases. Jordan has always been part of “Historic Palestine.” 15/
This fact does debunks the notion that a future state in WB & Gaza would mean Arabs only get 22% of “Historic Palestine” as often claimed. In fact, the same Arabs received 77% of “Historic Palestine” as Jordan. In fact Israel today comprises only 18% of “Historic Palestine.” ENDImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aizenberg

Aizenberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aizenberg55

Feb 5
🧵The Gaza WWI cemetery story should focus on Hamas militarizing it with tunnels & rockets. That’s the war crime. That’s the depravity. The destroyed corner is where the tunnel detonation occurred. As usual, only Israel’s response is condemned. Sources & details: 1/ Image
In August 2025 the IDF destroyed a km long tunnel adjacent to the cemetery. This has been geolocated in detail, confirming the demolition occurred where the current damage is found. 2/ Image
The Guardian piece today shows the area of destruction exactly where the tunnel charge was set off. 3/ theguardian.com/world/2026/feb…Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 3
đź§µAccording to many military experts like @EvansRyan202 @Mpolymer apocalyptic images of Gaza, like below are prima facie evidence of disproportionate attacks. Eyesight is all you need to know. The US would not do this. Is that true? Scroll down for more photos and the answer. 1/ Image
Large areas were totally destroyed or damaged. It's true, like here: Image
And here is more of the wasteland: Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 27
🧵One of the many disturbing truths of the Gaza war: PIJ knew its rockets were faulty and killing its own civilians (like at Al Ahli Hospital) and continued regardless. My fatality analysis estimated ~4,200 Gazans were killed by Hamas and misfires. It’s probably conservative. 1/ Image
See latest fatality estimate posted yesterday: 2/
Read 4 tweets
Jan 24
🚨Yet another “journalist” listed by @pressfreedom as killed by Israel has now been confirmed as a Hamas Rafah Brigade fighter. About half of the ~200 so-called journalists killed are confirmed terrorists, eventually most, if not all, will be similarly identified. Details 1/ Image
Credit to @MiddleEastBuka who scours social media to located the mourning posters. After 2 years of hiding the mass death of Hamas combatants, families & friends are revealing the truth. Detailed evidence below: 2/
Here is the @pressfreedom listing for this now confirmed US-designated terrorist. @jodieginsberg as CEO of the organization will you remove confirmed terrorists from the list of killed journalists in Gaza? 3/

cpj.org/data/people/mo…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
There’s been some skepticism about WHO vaccinating 603,000 Gazan children age <10 for polio in 2025. But WHO published detailed daily vaccination data by age & location. UNICEF independently corroborates all of it. The numbers are real and fatal to “genocide” hoax. Sources: 1/
UNICEF published a situation report in March 2025 detailing the polio vaccination campaign, noting 602,795 children <10 received the polio vaccine, 102% of the target. 2/ unicef.org/media/169216/f…
WHO published report in Apr 2025 detailing polio vaccinations in Gaza (p. 10). 560,000 in round 1; 556,774 in round 2; 603,000 in round 3. They note "humanitarian pauses" that allowed program to succeed. Hmm who allowed pauses? They won't say Israel. 3/ cdn.who.int/media/docs/def…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 19
đź§µAntizionism relies on 3 core libels: settler colonialism, apartheid, and genocide. Each claim fails on definition alone. Israel was not created by a colonial power. Apartheid is a racial crime. Genocide requires intent to destroy a group as such. Each debunked below: 1/ Image
Colonialism is quite simple. It's a policy or system in which a country controls another country or area. Sometimes the power moved its people to the colony to assert further
control. Calling Israel settler-colonial fails upfront. 2/
Apartheid is defined by int'l law as purely RACIAL; not based on political, national, ethnic, cultural, religious or gender identity differences. Palestinians are not a race. Jews are not a race. Israeli society is not "similar" to apartheid either. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(