BREAKING NEWS: Don Hankey, the Insurance Carrier CEO Apparently Behind the $175 Million Trump Bond, Is a Trump Mega-Donor Who Has Already Been Written Up As Connected to a Shady Trump-Adjacent Financial Operation rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
1/ Hankey is a major investor in Axos, a shady “internet bank” that has bailed out Trump before *under extremely suspicious circumstances* and whose wealth is... from unknown sources, it seems.
2/ ROLLING STONE: “Axos is an unusual lender, steeped in controversy. Its CEO and top investors have strong financial ties to the GOP. And Axos appears to be solidifying its position as the Trump-family banker, having previously stepped in as a financier for the Kushner Company.”
3/ The New York Times-bestselling Proof Trilogy previously established, in Proof of Conspiracy (Macmillan, 2019), that there’s a history of hostile foreign nations seeming to try to get money to Trump through Kushner.
That there’s an Axos connection to this bond is *terrifying*.
4/ The fact that Hankey is connected to an obscure, dodgy, politically connected online bank that manages to participate in *huge* Trump-salvation projects despite having an *under $3 billion market cap* is raising red flags everywhere. This is less than Trump claims to be worth.
5/ While the bond is said to be underwritten by a different Hankey entity, you probably feel, as I do, that if the money behind one Hankey-linked entity is opaque there’s plenty of reason to wonder whether the money behind—or being pumped into—another Hankey joint is also opaque.
6/ Something stinks to high heaven about Axos, which is a Hankey-funded lending operation just like Knight insurance is. This is from ROLLING STONE:
7/ Here’s what ROLLING STONE says about Trump's new lender (and savior): “SEC documents show Hankey is the largest non-institutional investor in Axos; Hankey made his fortune with subprime auto loans, charging exorbitant interest to financially strapped customers who need a car.”
8/ Every Trump biographer is getting foreign-money vibes right now, I promise you. ROLLING STONE on Trump’s new lender’s internet bank:
9/ Those vibes are only increasing. Garrabrants is another GOP megadonor who’s Hankey’s business associate and runs Axos. Where’s all this funny cash coming from—and why did Hankey tell ROLLING STONE that he supported Garrabrants 100% as he saved Trump and received such odd sums?
10/ Here we go: ROLLING STONE reports that a whistleblower complaint regarding Trump’s lender’s online bank involved concerns about “money laundering.”
*Jesus Christ*.
It certainly looks, now, like Trump did *not* have that $175 million himself, like he swore to America he did.
11/ MAJOR BREAKING NEWS (🚨): ROLLING STONE previously reported that Trump’s lender’s online bank is involved with major money launderers—including “foreign officials from major oil-producing countries and war zones.”
Which certainly sounds like it would include Russia.
*JFC!*
12/ Wondering why the SEC investigation into this shady operation suddenly disappeared?
Well, guess when the SEC suddenly closed it? 2017—under President Trump.
Scandal sure seems to be incoming, folks. If major media isn’t all over this, it should simply close up shop forever.
13/ Trump mega-donor Don Hankey now says Trump gave sufficient “cash and bond” to get coverage. Do you believe him? Do you think all the money came from Trump, rather than the *other* sort of people Hankey’s operations are alleged to have dealt with often? abcnews.go.com/Business/wireS…
14/ Remember, America, the March 8 bond Trump got—for $91.63 million—was gotten by him with just hours to spare (though he’d known he’d need it for half a year). This bond is almost *twice* as big.
How was Trump—now in a *worse* spot financially than in March—able to get a bond?
15/ I will continue researching this possible budding international scandal through the night tonight, and then have a report up at PROOF tomorrow—hopefully in the AM.
MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: As Expected, Trump’s Meme Stock Has Collapsed, With Middle-Class MAGA Investors Losing Everything As Trump Cashes In—Which Was, All Along, the Intended Result of Trump’s Wall Street Scamming of His Most Avid Fans
PS/ This post doesn’t say—nor would it be true to say—Trump has sold any of his meme stock. But taking a worthless social media company public increased his net worth on paper; his odds of getting loans; and his positive press. It enriches him no matter what happens to the stock.
PS2/ Major media has reported that it is theoretically possible for Trump to (a) borrow against these new paper assets; (b) initiate a lock-up waiver that would allow him to sell a small number of his shares per quarter; or (c) perhaps even use his position as partial collateral.
I’m a bestselling Trump biographer, and I’m telling you that Donald Trump is an atheist. He doesn’t believe in God and never has.
There’s nothing wrong with atheism; I’m agnostic myself. But for Trump to frame himself as a Christian is heretical because—again—he’s a nonbeliever.
Trump was born into a fake “church” that’s more commonly been called a cult. Its supposed “doctrine”—the Power of Positive Thinking—has been deemed heretical by theologians and has nothing to do with Christianity (and any link it had—like opposing divorce—Trump happily ignored).
When he began his turn to politics, Trump bought off a series of evangelical leaders he gleefully *skewered* in private conversations so that they’d pretend that he’s a Christian. They know he’s an atheist with no interest in Christianity. Which is fine! But the hypocrisy is not.
1/ First we must establish why the topic of this thread matters. Does the rank hypocrisy on immigration policy associated with the two biggest anti-illegal-immigrant crusaders in America—Elon Musk and Donald Trump—mean that they’re wrong to oppose illegal immigration? Not at all.
2/ The question under review here is not really about immigration at all. We already know that Democrats and Republicans in Congress were prepared to pass the most draconian anti-illegal-immigration bill in decades and it was (a) blocked backchannel by Trump, (b) opposed by Musk.
How *obsessive* is PROOF about getting the facts right? *This* obsessive (from the latest report at PROOF, on Elon Musk, and keep in mind that all of this is a mere *aside*):
(PS) When I became an Elon Musk biographer I found out that his life story has more holes than a fishing net. Anyone who claims to know anything about him is deceiving you—as you point to any fact of his pre-2000 life and I’ll show you *100 ways* it’s still in major contestation.
(PS2) He came to America first—or Canada first. Unclear. He arrived in North America at 16, 17, 18 or 19. Unclear. He was at college in Canada in 1989—or not. He was still at Queen’s in 1992—or not. He was done with his classes at Penn in 1993. Or 1994. Or 1995. Or 1996. Or 1997.