In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, VoterGA's Garland Favorito is going over his audit of the Fulton County election.
His audit - 60% error rate - results did not match ballot images.
Tally sheet totals didn’t match the ballot images.
Found falsified tally sheets - 100 to nothing for Biden. Some were 200 to nothing, a technical impossibility. Whereas the ballot images showed a 60-40 ratio of Biden to Trump.
They found 200k duplicate scanned ballots, but ongoing research has bumped that number up to 375k.
The hand audit count was short - 17k votes had no ballot images. Dr. Spock confirmed that in the Raffensperger case, called them Cast Vote Records.
A ballot image is necessary to create a CVR. It’s not possible to have more votes than ballot images. It’s like creating votes out of thin air.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, operational security expert Harry Houry said risk limiting audits look at whether the counts and registration of precinct tickets and ballots seem to be accurate. But they don’t look at it holistically. Extremely small portion of what's required to determine whether or not a system is secure in a particular use context.
Auditable items is an affirmative requirement, so the destruction of them is against the concept of the risk management framework. A risk management framework analysis wasn’t done after Georgia 2020 election.
There was a total breach. Election wasn’t conducted according to the law. No signature verification - 160k votes in the system that weren’t supposed to be there. No cure possible. The election was not valid by cybersecurity standards. He said this is my area of expertise.
Scanning at night in Fulton County - an operational security breach that inserted an unknown number of invalid ballots into the system against the rules of conduct of the election.
"If you can’t tell me who won, you can’t tell me certification was proper."
In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, VoterGA's Garland Favorito, the DC Bar's attorney Hamilton Fox is asking Favorito if he has evidence of actual fraud, not just the opportunity for fraud. He requested ballot images. Found many of them had been destroyed against state law. Fulton County ballot images were digitally altered before certification. That is actual fraud that has not been investigated to this day.
Another example of actual fraud is mail-in ballots - not on correct paper stock, marked with toner not pens, sworn affidavits of senior workers revealed this. He said this was "clear evidence of fraud."
Another possible example was 8k ballots doublescanned statewide - that was fraud or errors or a mixture of both.
Kari Lake's new book went on sale today and it is full of fascinating insights and shocking stories. You won't be able to put it down. She's an excellent writer and it's obvious it wasn't ghostwritten, with her clever hilarious style. I highly recommend it. Here are some of the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
My colleague @ConradsonJordan provides more dish from the book here - "President Trump was the 'archetype' of Lake’s strategy on the campaign trail and her vision for Arizona. Trump was Kari Lake’s blueprint to Make Arizona Great Again while sparring with the media propagandists… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Some juicy bits from @BenBergquam - "Kari Lake starts off the most offensive way you can against the left with a forword by the man they love to hate, President Donald J. Trump! Then she takes you on a journey from a nostalgic, midwestern American childhood that the enemies of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Utterly devastating testimony in Kari Lake's trial today by Maricopa County Level 1 signature reviewer Andy Meyers. He said the Level 2 reviewers wouldn't even bother reviewing the signatures when they got too busy. He also said there weren't enough Level 2 reviewers.
He said only about 1/10 of the signatures that should have been rejected were. There should have been 12,000 rejected out of 60,000 a day, but only 800-1,000 were.
He said despite the volume of signatures to verify doubled in the general after the primary, the county didn't make any changes to accommodate the increase in work. “I told my wife I was going to be working weekends because of the volume, but nothing happened.”
Attorney Alexis Danneman, who works for leftist Perkins Coie, is arguing against Abe Hamadeh at his election contest hearing that the statutes don't allow for his efforts challenging the election. Bwahahahaha you can't make this stuff up.
She's now saying if Abe Hamadeh is allowed to inspect the ballots, then he says it would "probably change the results" which is "speculative." Bwahahahah he's not saying it would probably change the results, that's a lie; he's CERTAIN it will change the results.
She's so awful. She goes, “They had a trial, they had an opportunity to put on their case.” Wow. Just ignores the fact Katie Hobbs withheld undercounted ballots in Pinal County from that trial! Frankly embarrassing hearing an attorney argue that.
I have a bombshell article coming out at The Arizona Sun Times tomorrow regarding last year's bogus election in Arizona. My mind is still reeling from what I just found out. This is one of those legendary things we'll be citing for years. Won't be easy for the left to refute.
I will say this, based on what I know about election fraud at this point, the only way these gutless wonders we have for judges (and I say this with my dad as a retired judge) are ever going to say there’s evidence is if multiple operatives admit they were paid to fix elections.
Just wanted to let everyone know the article is scheduled to come out at 10:30 am EST tomorrow (it's required to be embargoed until then) and will tweet it then too. To ME, it's extremely convincing evidence that Lake, Hamadeh and Finchem won, but it's not court of law evidence.