Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Rachel Alexander Profile picture
@Rach_IC
Apr 2, 2024 • 3 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, VoterGA's Garland Favorito is going over his audit of the Fulton County election.

His audit - 60% error rate - results did not match ballot images.
Tally sheet totals didn’t match the ballot images.
Found falsified tally sheets - 100 to nothing for Biden. Some were 200 to nothing, a technical impossibility. Whereas the ballot images showed a 60-40 ratio of Biden to Trump.

voterga.org/wp-content/upl…
They found 200k duplicate scanned ballots, but ongoing research has bumped that number up to 375k.
The hand audit count was short - 17k votes had no ballot images. Dr. Spock confirmed that in the Raffensperger case, called them Cast Vote Records.
A ballot image is necessary to create a CVR. It’s not possible to have more votes than ballot images. It’s like creating votes out of thin air.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Rachel Alexander

Rachel Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Rach_IC

Rachel Alexander Profile picture
Mar 19
In the appeal arguments over the disbarment trial of John Eastman, the California bar's attorney is already starting out with obvious lies. She said that Eastman said there was fraud in the 2020 election. The left loves to use that word because it's very difficult to prove the elements of fraud. The reality is Eastman was concerned laws were broken, wrongdoing, corruption etc. See how they have to lie to get anywhere?
---
Respondent made repeated and intentional false statements to the courts, the media and the microphone closer to you, and just that, during your whole oral argument, I'll start again. Respondent made repeated and intentional false statements to the courts the media and Vice President Pence that the 2020, presidential election had been stolen from Trump as a candidate who was his client through outcomes of terminative fraud, and that there were legally valid Trump electors available to stop this deal. These lies were part of a coordinated plan with Trump to deceive Vice President Pence into believing that he had both a factual basis and the legal authority to unilaterally stop the electoral count. Respondent knew that his statistical evidence was not evidence of fraud. He knew that his so called experts had no experience in elections, and he knew that their voter record numbers were wrong. He knew that there were no dual slate of electors because no state legislature had acted to certify a second slate, and he knew the president of the Senate did not have the power to reject certified electors or delay the counting of their votes. The whole point was to create the illusion of fraud, of active litigation and of multiple slaves of electors in order to convince pence to discard or delay the counting of electoral votes. He did not care whether the lawsuits were successful. He did not even know what was going on in Arizona, Nevada or New Mexico. But that did not keep him from recommending to Vice President to not count for their electoral votes, and he also didn't want his vetted by anyone. He knew that no court would ever say that the Vice President would have the authority to reject votes. And he also exploited his knowledge of President Trump's personality in order to bring in my voice to conspiracy. And basically, when you look at the six page memo, responded, effectively confesses that he's willing to cheat. That's why he says we're no longer playing by meeting their rules. Therefore, now his actions, the whole point of the conspiracy was to delay or stop the counting of the electoral votes. His actions culminated in the events of January 6, where he, working in concert with President Trump, told the same repeated lies about the factual basis for a stolen election, and he told the same lies about the Vice President having unilateral authority to reject the vote, and these misrepresentations in that volatile environment, naturally and foreseeably contributed to the harm that occurred on January 6. The whole point of this conspiracy was to delay the electoral count, and that's exactly what they did on January 6, but because all of the other efforts had failed. He turned to the crowd, in order to use them to do that.
In the appeal arguments over the disbarment trial of John Eastman, the California bar's attorney is comparing his behavior to that of a woman who took the bar exam for her husband, stating it's similar harm. Disgusting.
In the appeal arguments over the disbarment trial of John Eastman, the California bar's attorney actually said this, "There's been no evidence anywhere of any a single fraudulent vote that that just didn't happen. It he couldn't produce any evidence in the year 2023 when the trial went forward in the year 2025 and there's no evidence of a single fraudulent ballot anywhere. And to tell those kinds of lies..."

Wow. This is embarrassing. Even leftist judges have admitted there have been dead voters in the 2020 election. Her arrogance is stunning.
Read 23 tweets
Rachel Alexander Profile picture
Dec 19, 2024
Live oral arguments now starting in the DC Bar disciplinary proceedings against Trump's former official Jeffrey Clark. A board has issued a preliminary recommendation suspending his license, which he is objecting to. He is being disciplined for merely drafting a letter that was never sent to Georgia officials advising them of their actions after the botched 2020 presidential election.

Watch now - youtube.com/watch?v=kG0sHj…
The attorney for the DC Bar just referred to the letter Jeffrey Clark drafted re the 2020 election that was never even sent as a "false letter." 🤡🤡🤡🤡One of the attorneys on the disciplinary board wasn't even buying it, she responded that the attorneys ethics rules don't prohibit attorneys from disagreeing with their superiors.
The attorney for the DC Bar, Hamilton Fox, keeps repeating that Jeffrey Clark never submitted any evidence of election wrongdoing in 2020. 🤡🤡🤡🤡I sat through and watched almost his entire bar disciplinary proceeding. That is a flat out lie. He presented massive amounts of evidence and some of the best expert witnesses on election fraud testified!
Read 5 tweets
Rachel Alexander Profile picture
Apr 3, 2024
In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, operational security expert Harry Houry said risk limiting audits look at whether the counts and registration of precinct tickets and ballots seem to be accurate. But they don’t look at it holistically. Extremely small portion of what's required to determine whether or not a system is secure in a particular use context.
Auditable items is an affirmative requirement, so the destruction of them is against the concept of the risk management framework. A risk management framework analysis wasn’t done after Georgia 2020 election.
There was a total breach. Election wasn’t conducted according to the law. No signature verification - 160k votes in the system that weren’t supposed to be there. No cure possible. The election was not valid by cybersecurity standards. He said this is my area of expertise.
Scanning at night in Fulton County - an operational security breach that inserted an unknown number of invalid ballots into the system against the rules of conduct of the election.
"If you can’t tell me who won, you can’t tell me certification was proper."
Read 5 tweets
Rachel Alexander Profile picture
Apr 2, 2024
In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, VoterGA's Garland Favorito, the DC Bar's attorney Hamilton Fox is asking Favorito if he has evidence of actual fraud, not just the opportunity for fraud. He requested ballot images. Found many of them had been destroyed against state law. Fulton County ballot images were digitally altered before certification. That is actual fraud that has not been investigated to this day.
Another example of actual fraud is mail-in ballots - not on correct paper stock, marked with toner not pens, sworn affidavits of senior workers revealed this. He said this was "clear evidence of fraud."
Another possible example was 8k ballots doublescanned statewide - that was fraud or errors or a mixture of both.
Read 4 tweets
Rachel Alexander Profile picture
Jun 27, 2023
Kari Lake's new book went on sale today and it is full of fascinating insights and shocking stories. You won't be able to put it down. She's an excellent writer and it's obvious it wasn't ghostwritten, with her clever hilarious style. I highly recommend it. Here are some of the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
My colleague @ConradsonJordan provides more dish from the book here - "President Trump was the 'archetype' of Lake’s strategy on the campaign trail and her vision for Arizona. Trump was Kari Lake’s blueprint to Make Arizona Great Again while sparring with the media propagandists… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Some juicy bits from @BenBergquam - "Kari Lake starts off the most offensive way you can against the left with a forword by the man they love to hate, President Donald J. Trump! Then she takes you on a journey from a nostalgic, midwestern American childhood that the enemies of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 4 tweets
Rachel Alexander Profile picture
May 17, 2023
Utterly devastating testimony in Kari Lake's trial today by Maricopa County Level 1 signature reviewer Andy Meyers. He said the Level 2 reviewers wouldn't even bother reviewing the signatures when they got too busy. He also said there weren't enough Level 2 reviewers.
He said only about 1/10 of the signatures that should have been rejected were. There should have been 12,000 rejected out of 60,000 a day, but only 800-1,000 were.
He said despite the volume of signatures to verify doubled in the general after the primary, the county didn't make any changes to accommodate the increase in work. “I told my wife I was going to be working weekends because of the volume, but nothing happened.”
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(