Jared Profile picture
Apr 2 10 tweets 12 min read Read on X
1/ Selling “penny puts” in the $SPX complex has become commonplace in today’s markets, it’s essentially now a socially acceptable practice amongst portfolio managers. This is the story of James Cordier from Optionsellers, a fund that blew up and the infamous $150M margin call.Image
2/ Before we dive into how selling $SPX penny puts and Optionsellers is connected, it’s important to begin with the story of Cordier’s fund and career.

James began his career at Heinold Commodities in Milwaukee as a broker in 1984. After establishing a good reputation in the industry, he took his expertise and founded Liberty Trading Group in 1999. The futures/options brokerage would use options to bet on the prices of wheat, natural gas, and corn. From there, the group would eventually morph into what we know as the infamous Optionsellers fund. The fund managed about 300 high net worth clients who ranged from the owner of the Tampa Bay Lighting to elderly folks in their 90s.

In 2005, James wrote the book, “The Complete Guide to Option Selling: How Selling Options Can Lead to Stellar Returns in Bull and Bear Markets.” The book went on to be published by McGraw Hill in 2015. He also was a regular guest analyst on CNBC, Bloomberg Television, Fox Business News, and had publications on major news outlets like the Wall Street Journal. It’s safe to say that people trusted James with their money and his fund quickly grew in AUM.Image
Image
3/ Optionsellers as the name implies, specialized in selling options, mainly deep out-of-the-money options. Assuming you already have basic knowledge of what an option is, why would James only sell DOTM (deep out of the money) calls and puts? Four words. Leverage to the tits!

In 2016, James did an interview with the site Borntosell where he said, “Commodity options this far out of the money don't move dramatically like at-the-money stock options. In addition, the leverage in commodities allows investors to get much bigger premiums with substantially smaller margins. For example, 50% to 100% out-of-the-money and expire in 6-9 months. We might get $700 for the call and the margin requirement is around $1000. A single contract of gold controls 100 ounces, so this is an option on about $100K of underlying value.” I’ll leave the payoff diagram to a DOTM call option below.Image
4/ This exact philosophy of high leverage trades is what’s going to cause the ultimate blowup of his fund, but how did it happen?

In the fall of 2018, the BLS reported that Natural Gas storage supply hit a 16 year low. Fast forward to November 14th, 2018 and warnings of a cold front spiked natural gas futures by 18% to a 4 year high on that day, as shown in the chart below. The optionsellers fund was short calls in very large quantities. This ultimately led to a snowball effect of those short calls needing to be covered, or in other words, his broker decided the position had more unrealized loss than what was in the account balance, leading to a margin call. When James didn’t post collateral for the margin call, his broker liquidated his positions, leading to a $150 Million realized loss. Not only did everybody lose 100% of their investment, they were also hit with margin debt calls equal to about a third of their investment.

Unfortunately, a Twitter user (who I won't out) had $400,000 invested with James, and between November 8th- November 15th, that $400K amounted to over a $1,000,000 loss. The user made a spreadsheet with the exact positions which I’ll leave a link to in the sources. Most of the short calls 5-10x in value within a single trading day!

You can see from the picture below that the short call positions never really went or actually expired in-the-money despite the Nat Gas spike. This technically means that James Cordier was correct in his prediction, but how did he manage to blow up his fund to the tune of $150M in losses?Image
Image
5/ Allow me to introduce you to the option greeks through the lens of a short call holder.

Delta: When you're short a call you hold negative delta which means that for every 1 point change in the spot price higher, the option price would lose that amount.

Gamma: In simple terms, this is how fast or the rate of change of an options delta when the spot price moves. A higher gamma means that the Delta can change drastically even for small moves in the underlying.

Vega: This measures how sensitive the option price is to changes in implied volatility. Put simply, for every 1% change in IV, the option price would lose money as when you’re short an option you have negative Vega. If Implied Volatility rises, you lose money.

There are third order Greeks like Zomma/Speed (DgammaDvol) and Ultima (DVommaDvol) at play but for simplicity sake, I’ll refrain from adding them.Image
6/ Now that you understand the option greeks at play, let’s look at the short call position the Twitter user was actually in day by day.

The chart below is the option PnL of one Feb 2019 5.25c:

On November 5th, 2018, James sold to open the 5.25c for 0.05 a piece for a net credit of $500 and Nat Gas trading at 3.43.

Fast forward to Nov 8th, 2018, and the 5.25c was still trading at 0.05 a piece. This is the calm before the storm… Business as usual.

On Friday, Nov 9th, Nat Gas futures shot up 6%, moving the contract to 0.08 a piece and resulting in a paper loss of -$300 (Futures Multiplier).

Monday, Nov 12th, Nat Gas closed another 3% higher, moving the contract to 0.10 a piece and resulting in a paper loss of -$500.

Come Tuesday, Nov 13th, Nat Gas went 10% higher to 4.00, moving the contract to 0.22 a piece and resulting in a paper loss of -$1700 per contract. James had the opportunity to post a few $million in margin collateral on this day in order to keep the positions open. Had he done so, you probably wouldn’t be reading this.

Wednesday, Nov 14th… Otherwise known as the day of implosion. If you remember from earlier, this is when mainstream media warned of the cold front. Nat Gas futures went berzerk, closing 18% higher on the day to 4.75. The 5.25c moved to 0.65 a piece. At this point, James's broker issued a margin call. When it was not met, the broker market sold his position like a fire sale, resulting in a REALIZED loss of -$7000 per call contract.

Had you been on the other side, you would have 14x your money! Talk about leveraging to the tits in options. You might start to see where this is leading to in SPX.Image
7/ In the equity derivative world, puts are more expensive than calls because of what’s known as skew. The risk is always that stocks will crash but the most likely move is higher, so option prices reflect this. You might have heard the saying “Up like an escalator, down like an elevator.” While this is true in equities, the opposite is seen in commodity derivatives. For example, look at the chart below which shows Nat Gas futures dating back to 2001. The major spikes you see are “crashes upward.” So, call prices reflect this reality.

The calls that James sold have a positive spot/vol correlation which means that as the spot price rises, so does the volatility of the underlying. You can think of this as the option Greek Vega. Remember from tweet 5/ that if you’re short Vega and volatility rises, you lose value. It’s important to drill home this concept because it’s the real reason why his short call position blew up despite the calls never expiring in the money.

As the spot price of Nat Gas went on an 18% tear, the implied volatility went higher on the calls, therefore the delta increased, which priced in a higher likelihood of those short calls expiring in the money. Likelihood is the keyword there. If your broker sees that you're short all these calls and they "could" finish in the money and your account can’t support the exercise cost, that’s when they issue the margin collateral requirement.

All of this is to better explain that the option Greeks is the reason why his position got absolutely pummeled like a steamroller.Image
8/ So how does the Optionseller story relate to $SPX “penny puts”? Well, as of late, we have seen a dramatic uptick in funds selling DOTM puts for 0.05 a piece like this example below. Why might they do this? Low correlations in a low volatility envrionement. The maximum profit is actually quite limited for the amount of risk they are taking on (Sharpe Ratio). Someone who is at the forefront of understanding this toxic flow is @Ksidiii. He notes that tail selling is “making a comeback today in larger size than the last 10 years,” and desks are “jumping over one another” to sell these penny options.

2024 has no limit of geopolitical risks in the marketplace. Likewise, the record breaking interest in systematic vol selling programs imbeddes further market risk if the trade were to be unwound and I’m not talking about call overwriting strategies. I’m referring to the elevated interest in selling the most toxic and convex parts of the distribution. While it’s to be foreseen what the catalyst will be, If a systematically shocking news event hits the tape over the weekend when participants can’t manage their trade, I fear what happened to James will happen to those selling these penny puts.

James had over 30 years of veteran experience as a professional money manager selling options. It might seem like all professionals adhere to strict risk management practices, but it’s just truthfully not always the case. Silicon Valley Bank failed to hedge duration risk, Bear Stearns failed to see the risks in sub-prime mortgages, the SEC for crying out loud failed to simply look at options volume in Bernie Madoff’s scheme, the list goes on and on. The point remains that if you sell a cab, you will drive a cab.Image
Image
9/END
In the aftermath of the Optionseller’s blowup, James famously made this apology video ().

Mr. Cordier now runs a commodity investment advisory site and has a YouTube channel which I’ll leave a link to both in the sources. This would be like if Bill Hwang started giving risk management advice on TikTok. Bill lost $20 Billion in two days...

The moral of the story is don’t sell penny puts if you don’t want to be the next Optionsellrs fund, and certainly don’t do it without proper risk management in place.

If you don’t mind sending out an email regarding “catastrophic losses,” well then, have at it!Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jared

Jared Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jaredhstocks

Mar 18
$SPX Is it finally time for a deeper pullback?

Essentially since November, I’ve had zero interest in playing any sort of SPX downside. I've discussed the possibility in this quoted tweet but have refrained from an entry, until now. I’ve mainly been sitting long VX to play the spot/vol correlation breaks and continue to do so.

The market is in my opinion, gearing up for a larger pullback into the $SPX 4780-4820 range that I've discussed extensively before, and a likely pause at 4980. With QOPEX rebal on deck, I imagine that participants take this generational buying opportunity to long what they missed out on. Assuming I'm correct here in the target of 4780-4820, my plan from there is to flip back long at least for a bounce if not new highs into summer when AMs take their yachts on vacation.

This market has been incredibly resilient over the last year and it's important to not marry any one side. I will continue to trust what the data is telling me, not narratives, and position accordingly. Remember this message now (SPX 5165) and the current euphoric sentiment around the markets. Over the last few months, everyone wished that they bought at 4800 and begged for a pullback but was forced higher as to not underperform their benchmarks. When we get there, I imagine the sentiment will be so negative that nobody will want to step in front of it when in reality, it was just a shakeout of the froth. This is similar to May 2023 when everyone begged for a test of 4200 to buy, but when the Oct 2023 lows occurred at 4100, nobody wanted to buy it, but me. While my conservative target stands at 4780-4820, I wouldn't be surprised if we undercut a bit like in the Oct bottom around 4650 which I'd consider that a blessing.

Listen, I sit long VX and would make out like a bandit during a tail event but it's going to take some seriously systematic shocking news for that to happen. The second VIX cracks 20s, the systematics will try to hammer the VRP back down and party like it's 1999. With that, all the events upcoming are well telegraphed. I believe this will be similar to June 2023 when $VIX went from 13 to 18 and SPX pulled back a few hundred points but we saw fixed vol get hammered with supply. This is because there is ZERO secret we are extended and "due" for a pullback where market participants are hedged/prepared and will monetize when we reach those lower spots.

When I started taking the markets seriously as a profession, my mentor told me one thing that sticks with me to this day. “Skinny pigs get fat, fat pigs get slaughtered.” This has kept me getting my ass handed to me countless times. For that I will not hesitate in closing out my position the second if the market tells me I’m wrong which will be closes over 5165 (rounding by a few points for simplicity). In conjunction, I’d need to see vol and positioning confirm.

Although most could care less for my reasoning, I’ve already stated a few in my quoted tweet, but here’s a couple; FSV/vol structure, Hawkish Powell, tax season, QOPEX rebal, BOJ, blackout period for buybacks, autocallables + more. I'd be happy to dive more into this. Structure-wise I believe this is a delta play and I like spreads to mitigate carry costs. There is also a lot of event risk with BOJ, NVDA, and FOMC where a synthetic put might help to alleviate this risk. You can hedge any structure straight short-term convex calls if need be, but there is some event vol baked into this week (which is a trade in itself). Again, this is a strong upward trend and I understand that I’m fighting it, but I’m willing to take risk-defined bets when I see dislocations. I don’t expect anything to majorly start until 3/21 and the bulk of the move taking place next week. I welcome any constructive criticism. Cheers! 🍻

Who do you want to be Powell? Miss your shot here and the legacy is set...Image
Happy Monday, I hope everyone has a fantastic week!
For those wondering, yes, I still see this playing out. Holiday shortened week with less liquidity as most firms are either on Spring break or early Easter. This simply means that the path of least resistance is flat to up but any significant news or flow can cause some extensive volatility as it takes less volume to move markets as opposed to a "normal" week. There is also less time-weighted opportunity to hedge when the market is pricing nothing for this week, keep this in mind. Diamonds have already given back the majority of it's FOMC gains and I expect SPX will follow suit. I'd still need to see 5180 be lost and further at 5146 with a clear reach for downside to remain confident. If by Tuesday 4/2 and Wednesday 4/3 this does not happen, I'll happily admit defeat but obviously this trade wouldn't be easy, it never is. I'm no market technician but the price action from 3/4-3/20 looks like distribution with the post-FOMC pop acting as a failed "look above" and back to the range, this is a common pattern. Institutions take time to move large positions and I don't believe they are getting silly up here in FOMO.

In terms of flows: We have a very large QOPEX on deck this week. Most sell-side desks have net selling for EOQ rebal with pensions due for the largest reduction (anywhere from $35-50 billion) which adds to my thesis. The $JHEQX roll is upcoming and dealers are already preparing for the roll. We are well above the upper-end sold call of 5015 so as of this writing I'd assume a non-event. Let's say we close the week at 5200 then the new strikes will be in the ballpark of short 4250p, long 4950p, and short 5450c (obviously not exact). Another large flow is in structured products where billions in index autocallables sit. We also get all of your exotics/delta one flows from correlation traders (dispersion trades) to swaps. Coming very soon is the impact of tax season on equities. Overall these are well telegraphed flows and participants know it’s coming, albeit large enough to have an impact.

I'll update the vol structure in the next tweet with fixed strike, floating vol, skew, FWDVOL, FWDFactor, etc etc. To note: I am seeing a decent bid in downside skew for May while April remains intact. Cheers 🍻
Instead of making a separate post since it's the weekend, I thought I would throw some Saturday research into this thread. Nothing revolutionary but rather interesting data from sell-side desks. I hope everyone has a great Easter weekend! 🍻

These 4 charts are from the technical research team at JPMorgan. They discuss SPX, FANG+, NASDAQ, and Semis. They note the dying momentum across the indices, no progress made since Feb 23rd, and the distribution pattern from February until now.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 18
1/ A recent study showed a whopping 41% of users say X can impact investment decisions.
You would think the world is ending with the mass influx of recently negative sentiment & IV at 3 month highs, yet $SPX realized volatility continues lower and is -1.5% from all time highs. Image
2/ Today saw the entire vol surface be re-priced higher, aka Fixed strike vol up about half a point. This is in part due to the recently large $VIX trades I have covered and some large put spreads opened. Skew and IV have reached 3 month highs, dating back to November.
Image
Image
3/ There's a 5 point vol risk premium currently which isn't large, but still noteworthy for this current vol regime. Option premium is in the upper range of the distribution. In all, IV is still below the median but above 1st quartile mark. More notably, COR1M is +57% since 1/11.
Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 13
1/ As someone who trades index vol on a daily basis, every time a large $VIX call order comes in, it draws a lot of attention from less sophisticated investors who believe Volmaggedon 2.0 is here.

TL;DR ignore the noise… For now.
2/ To clear up some misconceptions about this trade, there is zero immediate impact unless vol actually starts to get going here. This can be a large portfolio hedge as $VVIX and the $VIX sit near all time lows while the cost to hedge is nearly the “cheapest” on record.
3/ While it did cause $VVIX to rocket 14% on the day, initially spiking VX futures with it, you can’t make any major assumptions from this trade alone. What matters is “if” vol did get going. Dealers would have to hedge 250,000 contracts as the trader bought 250k of the 2/14 17c.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 9
1/ I think this is an extremely important issue/example that needs to be drilled home, and what I believe sparks the next major tail event. While it’s “funny” to us, it shows the lengths as to what current PMs go through to try and generate a fraction of Alpha in today’s markets.
2/ When I started out in vol trading “sell a cab, drive a cab” was one of the first lessons I was taught. This simply means if you sell the "dogshit" options then expect "dogshit" results. For example, if you buy 1 month $TSLA 1000c for 0.01, IT'S PRICED 0.01 FOR A REASON.
3/ This firm sold 9k of the $SPX 0DTE 4745 calls for net 0.10 a piece. For $10 (2 gallons of gas) these contracts closed at $2300 each (mortgage payment). What if they sold 75k contracts instead of 9k? This was a max payout of $100k... Dream of a Lambo but got a $13M margin call.
Read 8 tweets
Nov 13, 2023
1/ $SPX This past week saw the most extreme retail gamma imbalance (-$14B) in history.
$IWM recorded the highest ever call OI on record.
With OPEX this week, participants will look to monetize delta-positive positions.
Is Santa at risk of bringing coal with CPI/PPI?
Image
Image
2/ Let’s kick things off by looking at our current vol profile. As you can see, IV has crashed lower since the recent peak on 10/27. 30d IV has moved down about 7%. This is similar to the same decline in IV after the SVB crisis in March. Even 180d IV is down substantially.
Image
Image
3/ Likewise, Realized Volatility continues its own decline lower which paves the way for systematic funds like Vol Control to further add equity exposure. We are currently in a regime where RV>IV which means that options are “considered cheap.” Image
Read 25 tweets
Oct 2, 2023
1/ The lackluster reaction from vol markets while $SPX has sold off 250 points in 2 weeks is rather concerning for a bear case.
Skew and fixed strike vol are both either flat or down. 1M RVol sits at 11 with $VIX at 18.
These speak to the monetization of hedges on the way down.
Image
Image
2/ This is a PnL chart of the $SPY 10/20 420p. The purple boxes highlight the June selloff, August, and now September. Do you notice any similarities? Sure there's a buck to be made overnight but the suppression is quite clear for $25 lower in 2 weeks. Image
3/ I want to be crystal clear though, I don't believe we came all the way down here to not test the 200D + 4200 being the largest pull in the $SPX structure and being so close to spot price. I expect to see clear monetization of puts +long vol as we hit that strike.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(