Having returned from a whirlwind tour of 9 intense days of meetings in Beijing, reflecting on my discussion with Xi Jinping:
While Xi’s primary objective in meeting with US business leaders (I was included as a ‘representative of the academic and strategic community’) was to emphasize that China is “open for business,” he was also interested in engaging about the broader geopolitical relationship.
I was invited to offer a 5-minute comment on the relationship between the US and China.
In addition to commending him for what he and President Biden achieved in San Francisco in establishing a solid foundation for a stable, constructive relationship going forward, I raised a question about the metaphor he had used in his discussion with Chuck Schumer last October.
There, he said: “The Thucydides Trap is not inevitable, and Planet Earth is vast enough to accommodate the respective development and common prosperity of China and the US.”
He went on to use an interesting metaphor to describe the US-China relationship: “I am in you, and you are in me” (你中有我,我中有你)
I asked him what he meant by that. For a clip of his answer to the question, see the recording below:
His response captures the essence of the conditions in which the greatest Thucydidean rivalry of all times is playing out.
Across nearly every dimension—tech, trade, industry, military, and global influence—the US and China are destined to be the fiercest competitors history has ever seen.
But if war means suicide for both nations, then the central truth Reagan captured about nations with robust nuclear arsenals remains as true today as it was during the height of the Cold War: “A nuclear war cannot be won and therefore must never be fought.”
The US and China exist in 21st-century conditions in which each nation’s survival depends on cooperation from the other to address shared, existential challenges (nuclear MAD, climate change, global pandemics, etc.)
That requires leaders in both countries to identify what Kissinger called a new “strategic concept” that satisfies the contradictory imperatives to simultaneously compete and cooperate.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For a spirited discussion with Jake Sullivan about his view of the most pressing challenges the US faces today, what the Biden Administration accomplished, and what could have been done better, see the video of yesterday’s IOP Forum. iop.harvard.edu/events/america…
Jake has joined HKS as the Inaugural Henry Kissinger Professor of Statecraft and World Order. For Harvard students, he offered thoughtful clues about how to grow up to play a role in national security policymaking in a democracy—and the centrality of politics in policymaking.
In response to an impassioned question about whether what’s happening in Gaza is “genocide,” Jake explained his personal assessment of an ongoing tragedy that clearly moves his heart as well as his mind. On the position in the world that he believes the Biden Administration handed off to its successor, and what the Trump Administration is doing with that hand, he did not pull any punches.
2/ Could President Trump’s unprecedented tariff war against China stumble into a hot war with bombs exploding on American and Chinese soil? The good news is that most tariff or economic wars have not become hot wars. The bad news is that some have.
3/ As Washington Post (@wapo) columnist Max Boot’s (@MaxBoot) op-ed yesterday notes, this issue is explored at length in Destined for War: Can the US and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/…
1/ Are the tariffs President Trump announced last week on China more like a solid wall or a slice of Swiss cheese?
2/ Last Wednesday, President Trump surprised the world by announcing “I am hereby raising the Tariff charged to China by the United States of America to 125%, effective immediately.”
3/ That announcement failed to note that on March 4 he had imposed the 20% tariff “to address the threat of the sustained influx of synthetic opioids.”
1/ Has @elonmusk purchase of Twitter been the “unmitigated disaster” that the @nytimes declared it would be after Elon paid $44 billion for the leading social media platform?
2/ As the New York Times analysis explained two months later, it was “obvious” that “to most people outside Silicon Valley, Elon Musk’s ownership of Twitter has been an unmitigated disaster.” nytimes.com/2022/12/16/tec…
3/ In its next “final judgment,” the New York Times declared “Twitter is done.” (April 2023). nytimes.com/2023/04/14/opi…
1/ In what category is the US still number one compared to China?
2/ Answer: billionaires.
3/ Despite most manufactured goods and many other economic metrics in which China leads the US, in Forbes’ latest report on the world’s billionaires, the US takes the number one spot, with 902 billionaires. China is second with 516; India with 205, Germany with 171, and Russia with 140 round out the top five. forbes.com/sites/sylvanle…
Who is winning the drone war between Ukraine and Russia?
Readers of the American press could be forgiven for thinking that the answer is Ukraine. Over the past year, major American newspapers have carried an average of five stories a week—each touting Ukraine’s success in building and using drones in new and imaginative ways to defeat Russia.
Late last year the @WSJ boasted about Ukraine’s advances in killer robot drones. wsj.com/world/ukraine-…