The US Dept of Education has proposed rule changes to Title IX. That is the law that protects women’s sports. It will come as no surprise that the proposed rules gut women’s and girl’s sports. In some cases banning it completely.
A thread. 🧵 1/
The proposed rule says that any policies that categorically set up women’s and girls’ sports would violate Title IX. Oh, they phrase it differently but that’s what it means. 2/
Yes. You read that right. If you have girls sports that are for girls only that can now VIOLATE Title IX.
3/
There are some rules around when you can and can’t have girls sports. For example, if they don’t think the sports are that competitive, and the sports are more for fun, and the kids are young, you can’t have girls only sports. 4/
Schools have to take into consideration that sometimes sports is about participation. The younger the students the more sports is to be considered for participation and learning skills and that is why you may not have girls only. 5/
As students get older and sports become more competitive then it might be possible to have girls only. (Though by then many of the girls may have already self excluded.) At the high school and college level it may be possible to have girls only sports in competitions if it helps a school meet an important educational objective. (This will be a key phrase. It implies the burden is on the school to prove it. If you can’t meet this objective no girls only sports.) 6/
It also depends on the type of sport whether it can be female only. 7/
The proposed regulation focuses on minimizing the harms to the male students they would experience if excluded.
(The harms to the girls by all these proposals? Eh. Whatever. ) 8/
In December 2023, a UN expert said this would harm women and by girls by taking away scholarship opportunities and deny them the right to compete fairly.
The change would also lead to the removal of intimate spaces such as separate shower facilities and locker rooms. 9/
10/ Feb 2, 2024 the dept of ed sent over their final revisions to Title IX. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs is reviewing the proposed rules and meeting with interested parties through at least April 4.
Final regs are expected this spring or summer.
Legal disclaimer: This information is for entertainment purposes only. Nothing in here is meant to be legal advice. Do not rely on anything written in this thread.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, I posted yesterday about Keith Olberman’d weird obsession with Riley Gaines. Then I did a search for some of his comments about her. This is just the most recent stuff. There were so many comments I’d be taking screenshots all day.
1/
Here are some more.
2/
And yet another. All his comments are vicious. He is enraged with her for what? For protecting women’s sports? For speaking about schools putting men in the girl’s locker rooms? For saying no?
What she’s doing is amazing. She’s standing up for young girls. 3/
1. How many times does someone says “including others doesn’t hurt you”? We hear it all day long.
They are wrong. They know it. They don’t want you to know it.
2. Let’s start here. When women are a subset of women they cannot lay claim to anything that was separately a woman’s. In one linguistic sleight of hand, women have lost their individuality that determines who has control of something. Be it sports or prison or their name.
3. Now the woman is just a grumpy member of the group trying to keep something away from other WOMEN.
EVERY reason why we have separate spaces women is instantly wiped out with this trick. We are stunned.
We try to explain. We are sure it’s a misunderstanding.
If you don’t know just how blatantly anti woman this whole gender ideology is, here’s the perfect example. Two articles, same site, same day. Discussing the issue for men they know what a man is. But when it comes to women, we are nothing but owners of body parts. 1/
Here, women have lost their existence altogether. I can’t even repeat this headline it’s so demeaning.
I mean. COME ON. 2/
But you say, those aren’t serious publications. Actual distinguished people don’t say ridiculous things like that. You’re being hyperbolic!
Am I really? This is the Lancet. It’s a very high brow organization.
I Am NEVER Leaving This App conversation of the day!!!
Let’s start here. A bloke tells women that unless they are “producing” eggs they are not women.
(Fyi, women are born with all the eggs they will ever have. They do not produce them. But even if we did this is nutty). 1/
Our hero walks in and tries to enlighten.
Only the British can take trouser press and turn it into a deep cutting blow. 2/
This brought us to this logical leap.
Since metal can be recycled then humans can be melted down and reconfigured to become the opposite sex or a trouser press. I admit I was a bit confused as to which one. 3/