Hopeful claims w/o evidence: "thanks to gained immunity reinfections pose minimal risk of #longCOVID"
Scientific evidence: studies that reported on reinfections & LC show that #longCOVID incidence follows (almost too well) the theoretical cumulative risk growth pattern. 1/
For hopeful claims that "SARS2 reinfections pose minimal risk of LC" to be true, observed data points should form a horizontal line (parallel to X axis).
They don't.
Even for those infected only with Omicron subvariants. 2/
Risk increases w/ the # of infections.
Long-term COVID-19 symptoms prevalence per number of infections, reported by StatsCanada, fits perfectly the theoretical cumulative risk growth curve.
Also for infections w/ Omicrons only.
Yes, those results are unpleasant. For some they might look "too scary to be true". But pathogens are not our friends - they just do what they do.
Given all we know about SARS2, the wise course of action would be to prevent further (re)infections.
We have all the tools to do it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Oh, so that’s why there are almost no books/novels/short stories/poetry about COVID and the pandemic.
Not because people don’t write them. But because publishers decide not to publish such work.
It is possible to write a good book without erasing the context of physical/biologjcal/social reality:
“Our Country Friends” by Gary Shteyngart
I remember reading two articles early in the pandemic on fading of collective memory (1918 flu, tsunamis) and how the same may happen with coronavirus (yes, back then they called it coronavirus)
Aug 13, 2020: scientificamerican.com/article/the-19…
Babies have the highest SARS2 ICU admission rate among all age ranges.
They should be protected from infection by those around them and those around pregnant people & parents.
1/
Things that'd protect newborns in NICU from infections w/ SARS2, RSV, Influenza
1) Mandatory N95s for staff & visitors (stops short range aerosol transmission) 2) Mandatory testing for RSV/C19/Flu 3) Vaxx requirement C19/Flu & other 4) Medical leadership implementing #1-#3
2/
Safety of newborns (and their future health) hinges on point #4:
i.e. Medical leadership deciding to prevent irreversible health harms to newborns.
3/
Since 4 years (at least - that’s when I started paying attention to what they say) some 🇨🇦 health officials are feigning ignorance and innumeracy.
It is unserious. It needs to stop.
It misleads ppl & decision makers, leading to misinformed personal decisions & errenous policies
Basic basic basic math:
3% is 1 in 33
5% is 1 in 20
In medical lingo when talking about drugs’ side effects 3% or 5% means ‘common’.
Calling 3%-5% ‘rare’ (especially when dealing with exponential phenomenon) is a serious misinformation.
Misleadingly “reassuring” narrative circulating in 🇨🇦:
“Reassuring: measles outbreaks will fizzle out”
Yes. They will. That’s how measles behaved before it was eliminated.
That’s its intrinsic feature — outbreaks that die out (and come back later)
Grounds for reassurance = 0 1/
Measles was eliminated in Canada.
Now it isn’t.
That’s a fundamental and *categorical* difference.
Anyone understanding epi-math knows it.
It should be honestly communicated.
We crossed the qualitative border btw two “states”: From ‘zero/elimination’ to ‘circulating’
2/
The immediate effort should be to quickly go back to ‘zero/elimination’ state.
‘Elimination’ is a lower energy state. The costs of sustaining it are lower than costs of “controlling” a highly transmissible harmful disease which circulates.
3/