Malgorzata (Gosia) Gasperowicz Profile picture
Apr 3 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Hopeful claims w/o evidence: "thanks to gained immunity reinfections pose minimal risk of #longCOVID"

Scientific evidence: studies that reported on reinfections & LC show that #longCOVID incidence follows (almost too well) the theoretical cumulative risk growth pattern.
1/ Image
For hopeful claims that "SARS2 reinfections pose minimal risk of LC" to be true, observed data points should form a horizontal line (parallel to X axis).
They don't.
Even for those infected only with Omicron subvariants.
2/ Image
Risk increases w/ the # of infections.
Long-term COVID-19 symptoms prevalence per number of infections, reported by StatsCanada, fits perfectly the theoretical cumulative risk growth curve.
Also for infections w/ Omicrons only.

3/
www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-006-…

Image
Image
Yes, those results are unpleasant. For some they might look "too scary to be true". But pathogens are not our friends - they just do what they do.
Given all we know about SARS2, the wise course of action would be to prevent further (re)infections.
We have all the tools to do it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Malgorzata (Gosia) Gasperowicz

Malgorzata (Gosia) Gasperowicz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GosiaGasperoPhD

Mar 6
Measles among vaccinated is not a “rarity”, has serious epi implications👇, & health officials ‼️should know it

3-5% is👏not👏rare👏
It means 1 in 33 to 1 in 20 people
Something that has an incidence btw 1:10 to 1:100 is *common*

+spread is exponential



Image
Since 4 years (at least - that’s when I started paying attention to what they say) some 🇨🇦 health officials are feigning ignorance and innumeracy.
It is unserious. It needs to stop.
It misleads ppl & decision makers, leading to misinformed personal decisions & errenous policies
Basic basic basic math:
3% is 1 in 33
5% is 1 in 20

In medical lingo when talking about drugs’ side effects 3% or 5% means ‘common’.

Calling 3%-5% ‘rare’ (especially when dealing with exponential phenomenon) is a serious misinformation.

3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 3
Misleadingly “reassuring” narrative circulating in 🇨🇦:
“Reassuring: measles outbreaks will fizzle out”

Yes. They will. That’s how measles behaved before it was eliminated.
That’s its intrinsic feature — outbreaks that die out (and come back later)

Grounds for reassurance = 0
1/
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/agespecific-measles-mortality-during-the-late-19thearly-20th-centuries/F4D013C76395921C5338067A0BD0278C
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Publications/SUR_EMMO_European-monthly-measles-monitoring-February-2012.pdf
Measles was eliminated in Canada.

Now it isn’t.

That’s a fundamental and *categorical* difference.

Anyone understanding epi-math knows it.
It should be honestly communicated.
We crossed the qualitative border btw two “states”: From ‘zero/elimination’ to ‘circulating’

2/
The immediate effort should be to quickly go back to ‘zero/elimination’ state.

‘Elimination’ is a lower energy state. The costs of sustaining it are lower than costs of “controlling” a highly transmissible harmful disease which circulates.

3/
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31
That's how bad some research on paediatric #LongCOVID is.

In our letter to @JAMAPediatrics we point to obvious & fundamental errors in paper which claims that Post Covid Condition in kids is "strikingly low"

Those errors are so egregious, they should warrant a retraction

🧵
1/

Image
Image
Image
In brief,
What authors said they were going to measure in the intro (the formal WHO definition) was not what they measured in results.
They neither addressed the discrepancy in the paper nor in public.
The work has been platformed extensively.
2/
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
Here are links to the paper and our letter.

The flawed paper is open access.
The critique is pay walled.

(That's problematic for the transparency, open scientific discourse, and scientific "self-correction" process)
3/

jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
Image
Read 18 tweets
Jan 20
It seems that we have another coordinated misleading narrative going.

It’s extremely concerning how easily health institutions & MD community are used as an amplifier of scientifically incorrect and harmful narratives (eg. ‘Omicron is a natural vaccine’, ‘not airborne’ etc.)
1/

Image
Image
I wish @CIHR_IRSC would investigate who distributes such messaging/narrative-talking-points in Canadian health decision making circles, and not fall for such manipulation in the future.

2/
@CIHR_IRSC The timing of those posts coincides with Jan 18th US Senate hearing on Long Covid.

The effort of understanding this disease and of raising awareness about it is hugely carried by patients.

3/

cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/patie…
Read 5 tweets
Jan 11
Cumulative risk of Long Covid increases w/ the number of infections.
Long Covid risk in🇨🇦adults self-reporting 1, 2 or 3 infections ‼️*fits perfectly*‼️ the theoretical cumulative risk curve.
Also for infections only w/ Omicrons.

1/
www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/75-006-…
Image
"Cumulative risk is the new exponential growth"

I've included the equation on the pic👆. Try drawing your own curve. With 5%, 10%, 15% or random risk per infection. With 0.5, 1, 2, or 3 reinfections per year.
See how many years you have before you reach 80% risk of LongCovid

2/
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 26, 2023
It was my great honour to participate in the panel at AFL Convention @ABFedLabour last week!
Together w/ @gilmcgowan, Karen Kuprys & @jvipondmd
On C-19,LongCØVID, airborne transmission, impacts on workers, kids, HC system

& that workplaces can be made safe

📸🙏@TomEdwardsAB @jvipondmd & @GosiaGasperoP...
My slides: "Reality check"
✅Constantly high level of (mostly for!) Cøvid hospitalizations in 🇨🇦
✅C-19 is harmful for kids (kills more than flu)
✅C-19 causes LongCØVID (not rare!)
✅We can prevent LongCØVID by preventing (re)infections
2/ Graph from: https://health-...Slide title: COVID is harmf...Slide title: SARS-CoV-2 cau...Individual risk of severe o...
My slides: "CØVID is Airborne - by knowing this we can be safe"
Most workplaces (incl. schools, universities, hospitals & daycares) can be made safe: CØVID, flu, tuberculosis & other airborne pathogens infection-proof.
Bc we know that C19 is airborne & we know how to clean air
3/ Illustration Modified from:...ImageImageImage
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(