Several Africans were injured in a Ukrainian drone attack on Tatarstan. Russia is now exploiting the attack to spark anti-Ukrainian feelings. If anything, however, this incident can elucidate a gendered and racialized reality behind Russia's charm offensive in Africa. 🧵
"I'm from Kenya. I'm a person of color (...) Those who attacked our hostel today are real barbarians," the person on the video says. They are one of the participants of the "Alabuga Start" program, launched in Russia after the invasion of Ukraine. 2/
The program targets young people from countries that Russia officially recognizes "friendly," mostly from Africa. Through ads in Russian international media and on the program's social media accounts, they are recruited to move to Russia. 3/
Specifically, they are invited to join the Alabuga Polytech college in the Tatarstan town of Elabuga. 4/
"Alabuga Start" participants are required to work more than study. In a nearby facility, students are involved in the mass production of what the college calls "boats." 6/
The "boats" is just an euphemism for Shakhed drones, which Russia previously used to buy from Iran, but which it now produces itself in large numbers. Dozens of them are sent to Ukraine nearly every day, murdering people all across the country: 7/
The "Alabuga Start" Facebook account has many photos of the newly arrived students. The college takes pictures of them just in the airport: 8/
The main question – and someone has already asked it in the comments on Alabuga's FB page – is this: 9/
Indeed, only female students younger than 22 can come to Alabuga. As the Russian investigative project "Protokol" found out, Alabuga's director Timur Shagivaleev argued that male students from Africa "can be too aggressive and dangerous." 10/ protokol.band/2023/07/24/ala…
In one of his interviews, Shagivaleev said that the female-only admission policy is meant to prevent the emergence of "ethnic diasporas" and foster their "integration into society." At Alabuga, there's no room for men of color. 11/ rt.rbc.ru/tatarstan/13/0…
According to "Protokol," women of color at Alabuga are officially designated as "mulatto." This is one of the three racialized categories. The rest are either "Tajiks" (a term that is often used for people from Central Asia in general) or "specialists" (apparently, Russians). 12/
"Protokol" says that students spend 12 hours a day producing the deadly drones. African women live in isolation from other students. It is not clear whether they actually assemble the drones or, as "Protokol" suggests, are used as low-skilled labor. 13/
To read more about how "race" informs Russian "African" initiatives, here's my earlier piece on the widely-hyped "Afrovillages." end/ themoscowtimes.com/2023/09/27/rus…
As I was writing this thread, Alabuga drones attacked Kharkiv, hitting several apartment complexes and killing at least four.
This quote perfectly encapsulates Putin's arguments for war on Ukraine. Show it to any Russia sympathizer, in academia or beyond, and they will say it's a great explanation of why Russia is right – or not entirely wrong – invading Ukraine.
There's a small problem, however: 👇
This quote has nothing to do with either Ukraine or Russia. We've been there, haven't we?
The quote is from Hitler's famous Wilhelmshaven speech, where he reassured that Germany "does not dream of attacking other nations," but will never "tolerate intimidation, or even a policy of encirclement."
A 1886 city map of Bukhara, the capital of a Tsarist protectorate in Central Asia. The map was part of a secret Russian report to the General Staff that recommended capturing the city, razing its center to the ground, and abolishing the semblance of the colony's independence.🧵
The importance of Bukhara was immense, the author argued. It was the last remnant of Central Asia's bygone greatness. Worse still, it was a "hearth of Islam." The "flame," he argued, "can only be extinguished and covered in blood; the hearth itself, (...) must be scattered ... 2/
... piece by piece and destroyed so that it cannot be restored, and its priests must be eliminated in front of the Russian soldier, before the eyes of the entire people, so that they lose in their eyes their charm and greatness as much as possible." 3/
I'm writing a book on Ukraine under Russian rule, and here's what I have to say. This situation is radically different from Ukraine's Soviet or tsarist experience. This is Russia's fascist moment of the interwar type, although postponed for a century. 🧵
It originates in the discourses about national rejuvenation and degeneration, frustration over the post-imperial arrangement and the liberal order, dissatisfaction with the national borders ... 2/
… drawn in 1919. Its major challenge is an "enemy" group whose very existence is believed to be a result of a global conspiracy intended to destroy the national body – the Ukrainians. Recasting them into the inferior kind of Russians and eliminating ... 3/
In anticipation of a quick victory, Russia’s flagship news show “Vesti nedeli” gives the domestic audience two reasons of why Russia invaded Ukraine: to reshape the world and to eliminate the artificial Ukrainian nation. 1/
The Kremlin's chief propagandist Dmitry Kiselev says that Russia's primary goal is the imposition of a new world order (“novaia konstruktsiia mira”). The message “Bor'ba za mir” is intentionally ambivalent. It means both “a struggle for peace” and “a struggle for the world.” 2/
The second goal is, naturally, to abolish Ukraine as such. The existence of Ukraine creates an artificial division *within* the Russian nation based on political grounds, like in East and West Germany or in North and South Korea. 3/
Let's talk about "peace." Russia invaded Ukraine in the name of "peace." In the early phase of the war, "For peace" was its main slogan.
Few seem to remember that the *previous guy* who sent tanks to redraw the borders of Eastern Europe used exactly the same rhetoric.🧵
One may recall that while the preparations for the invasion of Poland were underway, the Nazis were busy planning a "Rally for Peace" in Nuremberg. "For Germany," as Hitler said in his famous Wilhelmshaven speech in April 1939, "does not dream of attacking other nations." 2/
"We do not dream of waging war on other nations, subject, of course, to their leaving us in peace also. The German Reich is, however, in no case prepared permanently to tolerate intimidation, or even a policy of encirclement."
Familiar, isn't it? What else did he say? 3/
Russia's Federal Archival Agency has published a collection of documents "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians" to substantiate Putin's wild allegations made in his 2021 article of the same name.
A 🧵you don't want to read:
This is an extraordinary book, even by Russia's academic standards. Naturally, it opens with Putin's article, which many believe – and rightfully so – to have served as a rationale for the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 2/
As if it's not enough, the article is followed by the transcript of Putin's infamous "Address concerning the events in Ukraine" that he gave on February 21, 2022. 3/