Diana S. Fleischman Profile picture
Apr 5 5 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Singapore's greatest asset is a relatively educated workforce. In the 80s Lee Kuan Yew implemented selectively pronatalist (aka eugenic) policies , like priority daycare, romantic getaways for educated singles and money for sterilization, to try to increase the number of children born to educated women. These were targeted at the better educated Chinese majority. They were both unpopular and ineffective- failing to bring Chinese birthrates up or the age of marriage for Chinese women down.Image
Image
Image
A couple of posters from Singapore's pronatalist era- 1986
Image
Image
Posters encouraging Singaporeans to marry later and have two children- the second poster is from the 70s, before the pronatalist era Image
See the whole paper here cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/share.nanjing-…
Image
TFW you use abortion as a method of family planning
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Diana S. Fleischman

Diana S. Fleischman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sentientist

Jun 30
Childless people invented the idea that it's problematic and an invasion of privacy to post pictures of your children online because they didn't want to lose out in online status games against parents with cute kids.
I enjoy and collect cynical explanations for otherwise puzzling phenomena, this one about posting pictures of children online comes from a fan of @SimoneHCollins and I think it's plausible
Another one that I enjoy, but am not sure about, is that women tell other women they look great with short hair because they actually look worse, or maybe less attractive to men, when they don short hair.
Read 5 tweets
May 31
Recently there has been a reckoning about whether scientists, like evolutionary psychologist and population geneticists, are responsible for the "bad" beliefs and violence of people who read and cite their work.
I don't think they are 🧵
One of my colleagues @dconroybeam (henceforth DCB) wrote a piece for the Boston Globe lamenting that evolutionary psychology is commonly cited by manosphere and incel groups whose unpalatable attitudes include desire for a traditional foreign born wife, the belief that women are feckless sluts for highly dominant men, and that feminism and wokeness have had a dire influence on heterosexual relationships.

bostonglobe.com/2024/05/16/opi…Image
The most inflammatory claim of the article is that, because evolutionary psychologists have not called out manosphere influencers, evolutionary psychology has caused murder. Has evolutionary psychology caused murder? Let's unpack the examples Image
Read 21 tweets
May 27
The Guardian: Why does the racist idea persist that Black people have thicker skin than White people?

Meanwhile: Black people have thicker skin than White people.

Image
Image
Image
Next the scientific racists will tell us that Black people have darker skin, on average.


Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 9
A @sciam article concluded that women have an "endurance activity advantage" and that, therefore, women are as adapted for hunting as men. The piece didn't make a strong case & authors Ocobock and Lacy were pilloried.
Did they respond to criticism in a later online seminar about the pushback they got on their paper? Not really- 1/4
Image
They responded dishonestly to this tweet saying that there was no "evidence for women doing high-risk cooperative big-game hunting in any hunter-gatherer society"


Ocobock countered this by saying there was "no evidence" of "only males" doing big game hunting among Neanderthals (not extant hunter gatherers) or "anatomically modern humans"- pushing the burden of evidence back, rather than tackling the claim directly 2/4
Some of this comes down to rhetoric-easily defended position that O + L make is that women hunted too- harder to defend position is that labor of hunting was not unequal. Hunting is a primarily masculine activity. 3/4
Read 6 tweets
Dec 20, 2023
Sex differences are a central theme in the culture wars- endorsing evolved sex differences, or even a sex binary can get you in trouble. That's why #TheBigConversation - a conference bringing together some of the most prominent voices on either side of the debate was such a rare event- I wrote about it for @RealLastStand
Here are some of the highlights of the article
🧵 1/20

realityslaststand.com/p/the-sex-wars…
The conference consisted of 16 talks and 5 discussion sections- see a recording of the whole conference at the link below.

Some of the attendees were Cordelia Fine @hoovlet @DaphnaJoel @ginarippon1 @PsychoSchmitt David Geary @ProfDavidBuss @CostelloWilliam @TaniaArline Marco del Guidice @sbkaufman David Puts @Lise_Eliot and Maryanne Fisher 2/20

santafeboys.org/recordings-of-…
A central questions in sex difference research concerns the origins of differences between men and women. Are these differences primarily the result of socialization, culture, and stereotype effects, or are these differences largely innate or biological? 3/20
Read 20 tweets
Sep 30, 2023
This weekend I'll be posting from the #thebigconversation an event with opposing voices on sex differences like @Lise_Eliot @PsychoSchmitt @hoovlet @TaniaArline @ginarippon1 @SwipeWright @CostelloWilliam @DaphnaJoel @ml_fisher @sbkaufman & David Geary!
santafeboys.org/why-the-big-co…
#thebigconversation on sex and gender differences is going to be livestreamed- you can attend for free at this link form.jotform.com/232276404966159
Here is #thebigconversation program- including talks and debates
santafeboys.org/participants-i…



Image
Image
Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(