Highmarsed Profile picture
Apr 6, 2024 14 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1/ Russia has lost at least 55 (visually confirmed) of their 100 pre-war active 152mm 2S5 Giatsint-S self propelled guns, with 10 more units being damaged. In this thread I will show how many 2S5 they had in storage and how many might be left⬇️ https://ukr.warspotting.net/view/21619/110692/
2/ Since there is a higher number of vehicles and bases here is an overview of the numbers. Russia has at least removed 288 (~48%) and some of the remaining 2S5 have had their gun removed. Image
3/ Once again the 94th arsenal is the main base for storing this SPG, where at least 175 units have been removed until January 2024 (2S5 marked in red).


94th: 02.05.2021 55.014463,73.396814 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
94th: 10.01.2024 55.014463,73.396814 (SkyWatch, Airbus Pleiades Neo)
94th: 02.05.2021 55.018705,73.398902 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
94th: 10.01.2024 55.018705,73.398902 (SkyWatch, Airbus Pleiades Neo)
4/ Interestingly not a lot of vehicles have been removed between July 2023 and January 2024. It is possible that many of remaining vehicles are cannibalized such as the ones shown below but the satelite images from Jan are not good enough to asses the extent of this. 94th: 20.05.2023 55.014322,73.394237 (Google Earth, Airbus)
5/ At the 120th all (visible) 2S5 have been removed since the start of the war.
120th: 16.10.2021 53.224786,34.394875 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
120th: 12.01.2021 53.224786,34.394875 (SkyWacth, Airbus Pleiades)
6/ The 80th base had 31 2S5 in 2021 and after the base was reorganized in 2023 36 2S5 were visible which might have been stored inside. The most recent image I have from this base has very low resolution so some units might hve been removed since February.
80th: 14.08.2021 56.761397,61.189163 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
80th: 08.02.2023 56.761397,61.189163 (SkyWatch, Planet skysat)
7/ About 18 2S5 were stored at the 243rd, although it looks like 11 already had their gun removed before the war started, regardless all vehicles were removed until August of 2023.
243rd: 22.04.2021 48.353394,135.041376 (Google Earth, Airbus)
243rd: 07.08.2023 48.353394,135.041376 (Google Earth, Airbus)
8/ The 2S5 stocks at the 7020th also decreased significantly from 68 to 35 and it is visible in May 2023 that many of the remaining vehicles had their gun removed.
7020th: 05.09.2021 43.837600,131.993214 (Google Earth, Airbus)
7020th: 11.05.2023 43.837600,131.993214 (Google Earth, Airbus)
9/ All 2S5 were removed from the base in Lesnoi Gorodok and the 744th.


Lesnoi Gorodok: 27.05.2020 51.743303,113.032723 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
Lesnoi Gorodok: 09.10.2022 51.743303,113.032723 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
744th: 05.09.2021 47.410424,40.068830 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
744th: 09.01.2024 47.410424,40.068830 (SkyWatch, Airbus Pleiades)
10/ There were also 12 2S5 stored at the 230th base on Sakhalin island and all of them were still there in October 2022, which is the most recent image I have. Additionally I am not sure if these might belong to active units.
230th: 17.10.2020 46.766821,142.739459 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
230th: 13.10.2022 46.766821,142.739459 (Google Earth, Maxar Technologies)
11/ In conclusion the 2S5 is one of the most cannibalized types of the SPGs in storage and the pre-war stocks have likely decreased by more than 50% by now, considering many images are more than 6 months old.
12/ As with other SPG types the system is likely more limited by the availability of barrels (guns removed from stored units), but also ammunition, since the 2S5 ammunition is not compatible with other russian 152mm systems.
13/ Unfortunately I dont have any data on how many are currently in active service, but considering the visually confirmed losses and and the numbers of units removed from storage it is possible that more than 300 are still active, although the number is likely much lower.
14/ What do you want to see next?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Highmarsed

Highmarsed Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HighMarsed

Aug 1
Let me quickly explain what this video gets wrong about the current russian tank fleet.🧵
1. Russia pulled most of the tanks that were already in working condition from storage right after the mobilization started, in order to equip new units and quickly replace losses. This is why we started seeing un-upgraded T-54/55, T-62, and T-72Ural tanks at the front.
1. Since then, they have focused on refurbishing and upgrading stored T-72Bs, T-80B/BVs, and T-62s, in addition to expanding T-90M production. As a result, the share of upgraded tanks has increased, and the tank fleet has actually become 'newer'.
Read 10 tweets
Nov 1, 2024
1/ Here are some interesting things I found in the new high resolution imagery from the russian 111th storage base. ⬇️ Image
2/ Looking at tank and BMP numbers over the years since the 2022, it is clear that this base has been a large provider of tanks (mostly T-80, T-62 and some T-55). Image
3/ All T-80s have likely been removed and only some hulls that were partially scrapped in 2022 remain. Interestingly these have been moved from the red area to the area marked in blue. They might try to safe the hulls eventhough they have been without a turret for two years. Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 27, 2024
1/ Getting reliable data regarding attrition of the Russian artillery forces is very hard, but there are some trends that can be observed based on what is being removed from the storage bases, which I will present in this thread.⬇️ https://ukr.warspotting.net/view/19057/155050/
2/ Here are the equipment numbers visible on satelite images. Almost 11000 towed artillery units, self-propelled guns and towed mortars have been removed from visible storage since the start of the invasion. Image
3/ A large inital drop in the number of stored artillery systems can be observed. These were likely needed for the force expansion after the mobilization, since towed guns can be reactivated faster than SPGs, which have been removed at a more linear rate of roughly 900 per year. Image
Read 19 tweets
Sep 19, 2024
1/ Since the start of the invasion Russia has removed at least 8300 units of towed artillery and mortars from their storage bases. I will provide some additional information to the count we published recently. Image
2/ First of all I would like to explain the new ID system. I tried to make more use of measuring the guns to put them into categories. I would like to thank @bentanmy , for looking into which systems might be in storage based on guns removed for exhibits.
3/ I have also linked all of his threads about the individual systems below. Interestingly there were even ZiS-2 and ZiS-3 removed from storage for exhibits.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 18, 2024
1/ Here is our updated count of self propelled guns at Russian storage sites, with data points for 2022, 2023 and 2024. With @CovertCabal ⬇️
Image
2/ As usual here is the data. Russia has so far removed roughly 1700 SPGs from storage and 60% of of their stocks remain at the bases in various conditions. Image
3/ Interstingly some systems have been removed at a roughly linear rate: ~220 per year for the 2S1, ~160 for the 2S3 and ~140 for the 2S9. Image
Read 6 tweets
Jul 31, 2024
1/ Someone should update the "List of equipment of the Russian ground forces" on Wikipedia with Military Balance 2024 numbers. ⬇️
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_e…
Image
2/ Many bad assesments of Russian equipment are based on numbers from , which in turn seems to be at least partially relying on the Wikipedia article I mentioned above:globalfirepower.com
3/ The main problem with this article is that it is using some outdated numbers from The Military Balance 2022 that were corrected in 2023 and 2024.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(