I got this message from a fellow MIT alum just now. The tl;dr is that vaccines are NOT safe to give to pets.
Hey, on an entirely different note, I thought I might tell you about our Veterinarian, who has a lot of information on Vaccines. Because of his and my stance on vax in general, we decided to go have dinner together back in 2021. I learned a lot from him at the time because veterinary medicine is not nearly as "bought" by big pharma and MSM as human medicine -- remember, almost everyone pays themselves, no insurance, there is less money involved, and the doctor circuit is much tighter and they share notes: No HIPAA issues. Here are a few of the things I learned: 1/3
1) He is legally obligated to give rabies vaccines. However, most vets don't know that you can test dogs for the rabies antigens from last year's vax, and if they have the antigens, he can write down that the titer is high, and he can wait another year.
2) vets have discovered that vaxed dogs are much more likely to get cancer in the area vaxxed, usually the shoulder. He now (and for years) gives the vax in the tail of the dog -- that way, if cancer develops, the tail can be amputated without issues, vs the shoulder which is problematic.
3) There are many other vaxes for dogs, with similar impacts. He avoids them unless insisted upon by the owner, and if so, goes in the tail.
4) this has been known for YEARS. It's not new. It's been covered up like everything else. But, check this article out regarding a study at Purdue University where they SHOWED and PROVED issues by studying vaxxed vs un-vaxxed dogs:
If only people were treated as well as they treat their dogs! Steve, the information is out there. I know you know it's being hidden. This is just more evidence. Our vet has tremendous knowledge about this stuff, for reasons I can guess at -- but that is speculative. He told me things ahead of time that I was blown away by.
the article is excellent. The exact same thing is happening for human vaccines: the medical community ignores all adverse events as if they never happened.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
UCOD data from the CDC. Did you realize that the elderly had the SAME increase in mortality in 2021 and 2020 compared to 2018/2019 baseline.
This is INCONSISTENT with a massively life saving vaccine rolled out to the most vulnerable in Jan 2021. Whoops!!!
and don't worry. I age adjusted it and got the same result.
From Codex:
A population-adjusted all-cause age-gradient screen does not provide a clean ecological signature of a large elderly-specific mortality benefit from the early 2021 vaccine rollout. Elderly excess mortality remained elevated in 2021 despite prioritization (65+ +12.8%, 75+ +14.0%, 85+ +18.0% versus same-month 2018-2019 baselines), and the 2021-to-2022 decline was broad-based rather than uniquely elderly-specific: 25-64 fell from +31.8% to +15.5%, while 85+ fell from +18.0% to +7.9%.
This is not a causal estimate; it is a specificity challenge.
Aggregate ACM patterns require an explicit model before they can be treated as evidence for a large elderly-specific net vaccine benefit.
In plain English, "the CDC UCOD data doesn't show the claimed massive vaccine benefit... why not?"
BREAKING: Each side has now deposited $1M to back their claim on whether the COVID vaccines killed > saved or not. This the only high-stakes debate on this topic in the world. The press will only cover it if I lose. If I win, it will be like it never happened.
Today is my birthday so this was a GREAT birthday present!
Breaking: update on Alexis Lorenze who has been suffering after being forced to have three vaccines in order to receive medical treatment. She’s doing much better now that she’s getting treatment for her condition which she was not getting before we intervened.
Here are her platelet counts. Super low. As you can see, they didn't do ANYTHING to treat this. They just gave her pain killers. She's being transferred out of UC Irvine Health.