3/ That’s why 18 Tory MPs have written to the Environment Secretary “to ask you to support the bill or otherwise enact its provisions"
They claim transferring Natural England’s power to create SSSIs to the SoS “would not cause any protections to be lost”
This is arrant nonsense
4/ Since the foundation of the Nature Conservancy – Natural England’s predecessor body – in 1949, Tory politicians and landowners (often one and the same) have sought to undermine its powers.
5/ In 1955 the Tory minister responsible for the Nature Conservancy, the Marquess of Salisbury, was apoplectic at the NC’s plans to designate some land as an SSSI – which happened to belong to another landowning Tory MP. He pushed the NC to suppress its proposals.
6/ In the 1980s, what was now called the Nature Conservancy Council (NCC) came under assault from then Tory Environment Secretary Nicholas Ridley, who blocked the NCC from buying more land for nature reserves.
7/ In the 2010s, David Cameron briefly tried to get Natural England to sell off its national nature reserves. After his parallel plans to privatise the Forestry Commission’s Public Forest Estate were met with a storm of protest, the sale was dropped.
8/ In other words, Tory Ministers and their landowning friends have long itched to reduce the powers of Natural England and its predecessors.
Any transfer of those powers to a politician would mean a reduction in nature protections – as fewer nature reserves would get created.
9/ There’s still time to stop this.
TWEET tagging any of these 18 MPs to expose this effort to gut Natural England.
WRITE to your MP urging them to speak against the Bill at its second reading on 26th April.
And tell @SteveBarclay to publicly oppose these plans.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ These 355 landowners benefit from a loophole called the “tax-exempt heritage assets scheme”, under which they can register land and property as heritage assets and make them exempt from inheritance tax.
3/ This year's the 75th anniversary of the creation of national parks by Attlee's Labour government. But though some of the founders of Britain’s national parks dreamed of them being “owned or controlled by the nation” (Ramsay Report, 1945), things have not turned out that way.
I’m shocked, shocked to hear that the ‘net zero aspiration’ for farming trumpeted by the National Farmers Union in 2019 is now ‘in doubt’
The NFU’s plan refused to consider significant land use change or dietary shift & favoured bioenergy crops instead 1/ bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
2/ The NFU’s now blaming the last Govt for not including enough ‘climate-friendly measures’ in ELMS. Look, we can all hate on the Tories. But it was the NFU that lobbied vociferously to water down ELMS - leaving the most ambitious tier, Landscape Recovery, with 5% of the budget
3/ Where I agree with the NFU is in increasing the budget for ELMS to pay for more nature restoration - rather than cut it as Treasury are rumoured to want.
But we also need far greater accountability for landowners to actually deliver nature recovery & value for money.
REVEALED: Tory Environment Secretary @SteveBarclay rejected expert advice for review of climate impacts on soil fertility
Officials warned him govt's Agricultural Land Classification system is 'decades old' & will be obsolete by 2030
Story in today's Times; FOI'd docs below 1/
2/ The Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) system was drawn up after WW2 and grades land according to its ability to produce food - soil fertility, rainfall, climate
It was last updated in *1988* - before climate change had even registered as a political issue in the UK
3/ ALC maps are used in the planning system to try to protect 'best and most versatile land' (grades 1-3a) from development. The maps are also important for showing how we prioritise highly fertile land for food & can spare other land for nature (e.g. upland areas)
So @TheGreenParty manifesto is now out - here's my take on their nature policies.
Most significantly, I think, is their pledge for a new Rights of Nature Act - "giving rights to nature itself".
This would be a transformative shift in how we relate to the rest of nature. 1/
2/ Lawyers like @LawForNature @paulpowlesland have been calling for nature to be granted rights for years, to better defend habitats and species from destruction.
A Rights of Nature Act would transform how we currently relate to nature as mere 'property' or a 'resource'.
@LawForNature @paulpowlesland 3/ The Greens are also pledging a new Clean Air Act (something the Lib Dems have also pledged); to end the emergency authorisation of neonic pesticides (which Labour recently also pledged to do); and to meet 30x30 (a goal that is shared by the Tories, Labour & Lib Dems)
The Tory manifesto is now out - here's my take on its nature policies.
First off, the Tories attack Natural England & the Environment Agency: "we will improve their accountability & give them clearer objectives"
Sounds like they want to gut our environmental regulators 1/
2/ Earlier this year I heard a rumour that the Tories were mulling a manifesto pledge to abolish Natural England.
This clearly falls short of that, but it's part of a vicious war that the Tories have waged on NE for years - simply for trying to do its job.
3/ For eg, back in March, a group of Tory MPs proposed a Bill that would gut Natural England's powers to designate nature reserves (SSSIs). They even wrote to the Environment Secretary urging him to back it. Fortunately the election put paid to their plans