Thread by @tribunaltweets2

PART 2 -
NEW ABBREVIATIONS:
du? = didn't you?
wua? = wouldn't you agree?
u = you
dk = don't know
Court starting to come back in...

GC - Crowdfunding questions - Giggle received via CR yes? SG yes.
GC - CF by website?
SG - No, by supporters.
GC - Who is it?
SG - she's anonymous
J - why want to know?
GC - drawing ties to funding and with Giggle's balance.

J - why do you need to know?
GC - do you know the name of the merchandise, email address, phone
SG - Y
GC - how many times a yr, a week
SG - 7
GC - does keep SG informed on money
SG - shes friends - we talk
GC - how much money contributed to CF

GC - did person show merchandise?
SG - showed t-shirt -said it was greatt
GC - did you discuss the sales / merchandise / from etsy story didn't she? - SG yes
GC and SG [discussing buying the t-shirt , how did she come across the store,]

GC - would you agree that some of merchandise is offensive?
SG - Can i have a look at it?
GC - court bk 285 pg.
GC - see 'sweaty balls team tickle candle'
SG - yes
GC - are you laughing MS Grover!
SG - understand that some would find it offensive

GC - do you understand deeply offensive to RT
SG - is subjective what is offensive to one is not to another
[not the question was asked a no. of times - that some would find this offensive]
GC page 249

GC - [describing the merchandise -various items - states that SG knows this person - on page 254 - see jumper ' Hes a man ' crewneck sweat shirt."
GC when did u come aware of this sweat shirt?
SG - know before affidavit GC - so giggle -receiving these funds sG - Only Team Gig CF

GC - where did you see it /
Never said don't sell offensive items dy?
SG - didnt tell her what to do
GC - don't take upon you to tell its not nice
SG -ppl come to own conclusions
GC - have you shared
SG - few occasions worn and retweeted in celebration of fab work of women

GC [ you shared the store / merchandise / and retweeted it to others / du?
GC - 'all profits go to
GC - line of argument that the funds of all this merchandise goes to teamgiggle.
SG - explains how Etsy workgigglecrowdfunder.com

[line of questioning to confirm that the supporter - money mostly goes to CF (crowdfunder)
GC - has a line of discussion on whether Team Giggle, Giggle, Gigglecrowdfunder (may check off threadline)
GC - and you Liked these tweets didnt u?

GC - 285 - do agree with me - the sweaty balls candle - you reposted it/
You agree with me offensive merchandise has been sold du?
SG - offensive is subjective
GC - reads a tweet supporting the sale of merchandise - referring to RT grubby man trying to get on app

GC [ referencing # pages - that SG reposted on merchandise that GC states is offensive ]
SG - only reposted the Giggle t-shirts.
GC - looking at more pages - 19 feb 2024 - the first lie...is you dont change sex...Nxt pg 11 - this page you liked the LAG tweet - and another tweet.

GC -[ lists tweets that say 'castrated man' - Sall fighting for rights - ]
GC - isn't this hurtful - e.g. castrated man'
BN -objects - sG leaves room
- puts argument - cross examination not appropriate - on asking questions of SG of what RT is thinking or feeling -

BN - is saying the repeated line - of asking continually the same question asked and answered - of guessing what causes offense to another (may have to clarify this off threadline)
GC - talking about aggravated damages - references RT complaints from pages.. 135

Correction that was GC - last tweet..
GC continuing - gives RT's complaints about the likes or tweets, interviews etc from SG and others hurt feelings.
RT upset greatly that RT is not a woman - very distressing, draining and hurtful & says led other people has said hateful posts

GC - says - hurts RT - quoting RT - that merchandise and breadth of reach of posts - makes RT suicidal
J and G - [discussing whats to be inferred / or not inferred of influence of Salls reach (?) will have to check off threadline.

GC -goal demonstrate will provide exhibits to prove hurts
J - objects to posts made by others not by SG herself
says GC is asking about what others have done - not sG.
GC summarizing what she has done - will be moving on.
GC [comments that SG has liked/reposted]

GC and J - moving on - will discuss what SG has done - J has to be distinction tween creating posts - as to liking and reposting/retweeting
SG brought back in

GC - SG - do u agree how twitter works [asking how retweet, likes, or looks etc GC confirming what appears on SG's twitter feed.]
GC how many followers?
SG - dk - probably 90k
GC - how many start or no.
SG - before 2020 didn't tweet had about 10 followers, didnt participate

SG - starting to tweet on GII concepts - coz of abuse online - had no voice other than twitter. So hence tweet
GC - asked again # followers in 2022
SG - approx 45 K
GC - dua? u have 93K followers {looked at phone]

GC - have u reg. posted about this case. SG-Y
GC - have u reg. posted RT a man
SG - clarifies no woman would have to take me to court to say that they're a man (roughly the quote)
GC - dua? that called RT a man -SG-Y
GC - that wanted female space SG - Yes
and spoke at media

GC - sky news , CPAC and asked for clarification
SG -Y
GC - some 20-50 interviews [lists online sites like Glinner, Sky News, Triggernometry etc. IWD etc]

GC -[ listing more places that SG has interviewed, and confirming that has been harrassed & afraid of the applicant] SG confirms
GC - looks at page - Giggles front page - 'you must be a female to use the app' -If court finds RT is a woman that means RT gets to use that app?

GC - would you tweet everyday?
SG - No - not every day not to saturate it

GC - 1000s, or 100s of tweets
SG - say - original posts - wouldn't be 100 (?)
Guessing 50-100
GC - looking at 196 court bk. referencing Mar 2022 - describes RT wanting to get on app 6 / 4 /23 - another tweet 'no to males'
[ listing other tweets - which tweets about rt or men]

GC - [listing tweets about other TW who have possibly discussed the case and SG's response ]
SG - specific tweet about men are not women.

SG - Confirming that the 'situation that only a man who needs to be a female in law is that they're not a female in reality "

GC confirming - that SG 'you can take me to court for not believing a man is a woman it would still not make me believe' (rough quote)

[GC line of questioning is listing quotes - which are about RT or general , SG confirms which specifically are about the situation in general, case specifically or that men can't be women]

GC more quotes like 'TW are not women.'

GC - asking SG to look at more quotes -
BN - pointing out at issue - the paper copies differ tween witness and the court.

GC - SG asking about UK trip - did she meet with Glinner, Helen Joyce - asks if HJ supporting CF?
GC - repeats HJ tweet -said supporting - and giving to CF
GC - so HJ is not indpendent voice is she...?
GC - What about Kathleen Stock?

GC - have you spoken to Colin Wright
Sg - messaged
GC what type?
SG - asked about biological facts - DSD - for e.g.
GC - when was that
SG - over the last few years -

GC asks if copy of communication - and how many times with CW
SG - not a friend -just asked questions re biology and then on my way
GC - [now asking for number of times posting about court]
Sg - at least one a day

GC - 30 cases in this month agree?
sG - yes
GC [ working out how many tweets per wk/month - before / after court case ]
GC - says its 100s and 100s tweet - and " its been YEARS hasn't it?"
GC - [confirming no. of posts over the year - to establish 100s in each year]

BN objects - questions asked already- asking again.
SG - doesn't count tweets don't know how many - Im guessing
GC -calls SG - Ms Tickle for 3rd time.
GC - asking again if it's 100s a 100s
sG - is clarifying the tweets are over a long time

GC again asks - have you tweeted 100s and 100s a time
SG - yes
SG moves out of the witness seat.

Will thread roll - @threadreaderapp unroll