Prof. Grace Lavery Profile picture
Apr 10 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Re. the Cass report: the framing of trans civil rights claims in the UK comes down to a matter of whether you think transition is a tragic outcome, or a good one. I think it’s a good one. I am moved, galvanized, aroused, and intrigued when people take control of their own bodies.
The focus on detransitioners—to whom, bon courage!!—seems designed to nourish a fantasy that transition produces sad, deluded, thwarted, unfuckable, sick, barren weirdos. That fantasy, of course, serves those who might at some point have wanted to transition, and didn’t.
When J. K. Rowling says that she opposes patient-led healthcare for trans-identifying minors bc they might have “transed” her as a kid, one can sense, under the frantic contempt, a kind of envy. I can see why.
I’ve tended to argue that there are no trans people, only transitions; that the inclination to transition probably exists to some degree in everyone—at least, it is the norm rather than the exception. That’s an unpopular idea, obviously—we’re skeptical of Freudian universalism.
But whatever: coming out of the Cass report, we need to be able to defend transition as such. Not as a condescending entitlement for a pitiable few, but as a practice of freedom central to the dignity and potential of the human species.
If you like people who have transitioned, perhaps you like aspects of them that have been actualized through practices of bodily autonomy, techniques of transitions acquired and practiced freely. We need to get used to celebrating transition. It is a good thing.
And maybe that means holding the door open slightly longer for Rowling to speculate about what her life might have been like had she chosen a different path. We’re all entitled to regret, resentment, and ambivalence. But there’s a reason why rates of regret are so low.
Tell trans people you admire them today. We are not delusional, we are not subjects of social contagion, we are not entryists or creeps or rapists. We know what we’re doing and we are very grateful that we can do it. Shut up or get out of our way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof. Grace Lavery

Prof. Grace Lavery Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @graceelavery

Jun 15, 2023
Portland has been so great. Powell’s was a dream, I reconnected unexpectedly with three former students, from different eras, at the event; I met some younger trans women who spoke kindly about what my work has meant to them; and I ate at a truly spectacular restaurant—TERCET. 💖
And I’ve published so many essays in the last week, and ppl have been nice about them too, mostly! Filled with a profound sense of gratitude about the unearned joys in my life. Ten years ago this month I left grad school/Philly, and this life would have seemed unattainable.
At the same time, a testing day—running up against the dramas and confusions of a busy world of brilliant, lovely, traumatized, queers—feeling misunderstood and underestimated, feeling targeted and marginal.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 10, 2023
If the phrase “loony grad student, best ignored” doesn’t make your blood boil, you have absolutely no business being in higher education. Image
Everyone who works in this space has a particular thing that irks them more than anything, for me it is the contemptuous, misogynist, defensive, predatory, opposite-of-teaching response that Christa Peterson generates.
If I was lucky enough to have a reader as astute and committed as Christa engaging my work, as critically as they wanted to, I would be championing them constantly.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 9, 2023
I’m ready to disclose the details of the prior restraint of my research. The culprit is University College London, whose lawyers instructed the executive editor of their online journal THINK PIECES to pull my essay. The essay is linked here.

gracelavery.org/undermining-ac…
The doc was initially submitted as a pdf without footnotes—since it was to be published online, and citations would take the form of links, I used screencaps. When uploading the document to my own website, I added links myself. Here’s the original pdf.

gracelavery.org/wp-content/upl…
The piece is called, “The Gender Critical Movement Is Undermining Academic Freedom,” and adapts a lecture I gave at UCL, after an invitation from Xine Yao and Simon Lock. The lecture was well-attended, both by GCs and by queer and trans people and allies.

ucl.ac.uk/lgbtq-research…
Read 22 tweets
Jun 9, 2023
I think this is clear, but since some people have misunderstood (surely not willfully?), let me clarify: I don’t blame *any* of the GCs for the university’s spinelessness. I fully anticipate their support, as I support their right to publish in whatever venues will have them.
Like many, I’m concerned about the circumvention of peer review in a couple of recent cases, and I would not myself want to publish in a venue that prints their work. But I’m not against them publishing, and if a Uni prevented them from doing so I would be mad as hell.
I do fault the GCs is for misrepresenting the state of academic freedom in the UK. Their distortions have misused grievance procedures to punish colleagues; they have deployed vexatious threats of legal action against students; and monopolized media representations of trans ppl.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 8, 2023
Just as a reminder: in 2019, Prof. Kathleen Stock took issue with a student newspaper article reporting on campus climate. The article quoted people who didn’t like her positions. Prof. Stock called this libel, and instigated a hate campaign against the student journalist.
In order to prove not only that the piece was not libelous, but that Stock did not seriously think it was, and only claimed in order to force retraction, I republished the offending article, unedited, on my own website, in 2021:

gracelavery.org/prof-stock-ple…
Ofc, there has been no engagement on this. But my point is that there is a pattern of Prof. Stock and those like her using totally meritless threats of libel in order to shut down dissent. It’s clever, but it’s very wrong, and there’s no way they don’t know what they’re doing.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 8, 2023
General methodological observation: what has freaked UK administrators out about my work is that it actually names, quotes, and cites individual activists. This is because I do not want to make generalizations that are unmoored from the facts.
This might seem to be a mark of creditable scholarship. It’s certainly different from the usual run of GC “scholarship,” which mostly consists of uncited (because false) claims about what trans people think about themselves, and endless readings of a single Stonewall pamphlet.
let me name names, then: Alice Sullivan, Kathleen Stock, Holly Lawton-Smith have all published uncited, because false, claims about how trans people describe themselves.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(