This is the kind of nonsense that happens when you replace a political party with a clown show. Let’s unpack this a bit:
1. FISA is a bill that was created in the aftermath of 9/11 to allow our intelligence agencies to better monitor communications from bad guys even if they are communicating on new communication networks and/or with US nationals. It was in place through the Trump administration.
2. As with any surveillance bill, there are balances between US civil liberties to be factored in and we have rules to protect. That is a conversation one could have. But that’s not the point of today’s clown-o-rama.
3. The data we are talking about here is information that our adversaries already have. Suppose two terrorists are plotting an attack on the US in a foreign country and a US national is on the same chat thread. Do you want the US to have that intel too? I sure do.
4. But today was about process. Our intel and judiciary committees were working through rules and procedures to balance all those equities… and then a whole bunch of Rs voted against the “rule”. A procedural motion that must pass in order for floor debate and votes to start.
5. Rules didn’t fail when Dems were in charge because it is moronic and nihilistic to vote against a rule introduced by your own party. But in this Congress, Rs vote against their party rules all the time. Morons and nihilists aplenty, I guess.
6. They voted no because… Trump tweeted at them? Yeah, more or less. Not only morons and nihilists but also cowards who are afraid to alienate a twice-impeached, rapist/seditionist who’s going to trial next week for campaign finance violations made to hide his adultery.
7. And make no mistake. When leadership loses that many of their own members IT IS NOT A SURPRISE. And yet now the House doesn’t know what we’re doing this week because the calendar - which was predicated on debate and vote on that bill, this week - is frozen.
8. So if you’d like our intelligence agencies to work, to have Congress debate and craft legislation that balances public safety and civil liberties, to have Congress work this week… too bad for you.
9. Because Trump tweeted. And moronic, nihilistic cowards jumped. And a Speaker with no prior leadership experience acted like a guy who’s new at this job. It’s so offensive and disrespectful. To the institution, to the country and to all those we serve.
10. Grr. That’s all I’ve got. Just grr. But we have GOT TO GET adults back in charge of this institution. A House run by drooling sycophants is not good for any of us. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The presumptive @GOP nominee for President is desperate for $464M (and counting) which he cannot personally access. That fact alone makes him a massive national security risk; any foreign adversary seeking to buy a President knows the price.
We already lack clarity on what security was provided for the $91M bond he posted in response to the E. Jean Carroll case. That is already a plenty BFD. A guy who wants your trust and wants to be President should disclose his liabilities. nytimes.com/2024/03/08/nyr…
Indeed, all of us who run for Congress or serve are required to post regular reports of our assets and liabilities. The fact that we don't know this about someone running for the highest office in the land shifts the liability onto our democracy itself.
OK so let’s talk about the TikTok vote today. Because the amount of woefully misinformed calls and social media outreach over the last two days PROVES that we had a problem. Thread:
1. 1st, we DID NOT BAN” TikTok today. We voted to require Bytedance to sell TikTok if TikTok is going to continue to operate in the US. Bytedance is heavily influenced by the Chinese Communist Party, and does not share how they use your data, or how they promote content you see.
2. Bytedance thus has an opportunity to make a lot of money. US media has a chance to be free of foreign influence. US TikTok users have a chance to trust that their information is not being weaponized against them. That’s it.
This clip in Politico this morning is a good reminder that for at least a generation, Washington has never really worked when the @GOP was in charge. Let's review, shall we?
1. First, just look at who they pick for Speaker of the House - 2nd in line to the Presidency. The current guy is supported by hate groups and white nationalists. splcenter.org/hatewatch/2023…
2. The guy before him was Kevin McCarthy. No reason to talk much about the shortest-tenured speaker in history who - when the going got tough, quit.
I'm proud of @GovPritzker for doing this. And cannot believe the inhumanity of @GregAbbott_TX that he made this necessary. There is no religious or moral framework I am aware of that curses the stranger in need. But that is exactly what Abbott would have us do. Thread:
1. First, understand that the migrants being sent to IL and elsewhere are not "illegal". They have come here seeking asylum, have had their applications reviewed and are awaiting adjudication. During that period, they are free to travel around the country.
2. Their stories are the stories of all Americans. Some are fleeing religious persecution, some from gang violence, some from natural disasters. All looking for a better life and prepared to contribute to the US economy.
On this fourth anniversary of January 6th, let's have a brief discussion about the Constitution, architecture and what we collectively have to do to make sure 1/6 never happens again. Thread:
1. First, the Constitution. We talk about 3 co-equal branches, but the legislative branch was arguably the most important in our founders vision. Article 1 is the longest section of the Constitution. It's the only one directly elected by the people.
2. It has the power of the purse. The power to declare war. The power to remove officials from the Article 2 and Article 3 branches. And at the time of our founding it was where all the people were.
Anyone up for a nerdy #energytwitter thread on the Inflation Reduction Act, tax equity markets and international bank capital requirements? Because like Dylan, I'm about to spit hot fire. Thread:
1. So the Inflation Reduction Act - the biggest climate bill ever passed by any government ever is largely a tax incentive bill. Incentives vary by tech but the basic structure is that if you invest $100 in a qualifying project, you'll get some percentage back in lower taxes.
2. On the one hand, that means it's economic impacts are WAY bigger than the ~$350B we passed since every dollar of tax incentive brings forth another $2 - 5 (ish) of private capital. It's a BFD.